为非设计师提供发散思维的有形工具。

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
A Lesage, S Bourdeau, B C Caron, P-M Léger
{"title":"为非设计师提供发散思维的有形工具。","authors":"A Lesage, S Bourdeau, B C Caron, P-M Léger","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2511869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Design Thinking (DT) has emerged as a pivotal approach harnessed by professionals across domains beyond traditional design practices. To reap its benefits, designers rely on sketching, but non-designers hesitate to do so. This paper investigates an alternative tool to engage non-designers effectively in the design process. A comparative study was conducted, juxtaposing the use of pen & paper against tangible figurative toys, assessing the creative outcomes through Torrance's framework for creative thinking. 36 participants were tasked with producing two web interface designs using one or both tools, according to four different conditions. While pen & paper yielded a greater quantity of ideas, they fell short in generating a broader spectrum of idea categories or more original concepts. Using a tangible tool resulted in more elaborate proposals. Figurative tangibles appear to exhibit a greater affordance for divergent thinking compared to pen & paper, despite imposing a higher cognitive effort on participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empowering non-designers with tangible tools for divergent thinking.\",\"authors\":\"A Lesage, S Bourdeau, B C Caron, P-M Léger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2511869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Design Thinking (DT) has emerged as a pivotal approach harnessed by professionals across domains beyond traditional design practices. To reap its benefits, designers rely on sketching, but non-designers hesitate to do so. This paper investigates an alternative tool to engage non-designers effectively in the design process. A comparative study was conducted, juxtaposing the use of pen & paper against tangible figurative toys, assessing the creative outcomes through Torrance's framework for creative thinking. 36 participants were tasked with producing two web interface designs using one or both tools, according to four different conditions. While pen & paper yielded a greater quantity of ideas, they fell short in generating a broader spectrum of idea categories or more original concepts. Using a tangible tool resulted in more elaborate proposals. Figurative tangibles appear to exhibit a greater affordance for divergent thinking compared to pen & paper, despite imposing a higher cognitive effort on participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2511869\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2511869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计思维(DT)已经成为一种关键的方法,被跨领域的专业人士所利用,超越了传统的设计实践。为了获得它的好处,设计师依靠草图,但非设计师犹豫这样做。本文研究了一种替代工具,使非设计师有效地参与设计过程。进行了一项比较研究,将笔和纸的使用与有形的具象玩具并置,通过托伦斯的创造性思维框架评估创造性结果。36名参与者被要求根据四种不同的条件,使用一种或两种工具制作两种网页界面设计。虽然笔和纸产生了更多的想法,但它们在产生更广泛的想法类别或更多原创概念方面却有所欠缺。使用有形的工具会产生更详细的建议。尽管对参与者施加了更高的认知努力,但与纸笔相比,具象的有形物品似乎表现出更大的发散思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empowering non-designers with tangible tools for divergent thinking.

Design Thinking (DT) has emerged as a pivotal approach harnessed by professionals across domains beyond traditional design practices. To reap its benefits, designers rely on sketching, but non-designers hesitate to do so. This paper investigates an alternative tool to engage non-designers effectively in the design process. A comparative study was conducted, juxtaposing the use of pen & paper against tangible figurative toys, assessing the creative outcomes through Torrance's framework for creative thinking. 36 participants were tasked with producing two web interface designs using one or both tools, according to four different conditions. While pen & paper yielded a greater quantity of ideas, they fell short in generating a broader spectrum of idea categories or more original concepts. Using a tangible tool resulted in more elaborate proposals. Figurative tangibles appear to exhibit a greater affordance for divergent thinking compared to pen & paper, despite imposing a higher cognitive effort on participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信