ANZAED饮食失调认证临床医生的看法和经验的专业发展。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Janet Conti, Madalyn McCormack, Gabriella Heruc, Katarina Prnjak, Rebecca Barns, Siân A McLean, Phillipa Hay
{"title":"ANZAED饮食失调认证临床医生的看法和经验的专业发展。","authors":"Janet Conti, Madalyn McCormack, Gabriella Heruc, Katarina Prnjak, Rebecca Barns, Siân A McLean, Phillipa Hay","doi":"10.1186/s40337-025-01307-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential (the Credential) is the first national and cross discipline program to be developed that specifies the standard of qualifications, knowledge, and ongoing professional development activities needed for health professionals to provide safe and effective treatment of eating and feeding disorders. This study explored clinicians' experiences and perspectives of the Credential with a particular focus on the ongoing requirements for clinicians to engage in supervision and other eating disorder specific continuing professional development (CPD) activities to maintain their credentialing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 28 ANZAED Credentialed Eating Disorder Clinicians who participated in a semi-structured interview after completion of an online self-report survey. The interview and survey explored their views on the credentialing of clinicians, motivations to become credentialed, and experiences and perceptions of the CPD requirements. Analysis involved descriptive statistics of survey responses and an inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thematic analysis generated two main themes with three subthemes for each. The first theme explored the clinicians' priorities for CPD including supervisor expertise and competence, the supervisory relationship, and accessing and meeting the requirements for CPD. The second theme was on the clinicians' experiences of CPD focusing specifically on the development of knowledge and competency, support and reflective practice, and the supervisory context. Cutting across these two main themes were the clinicians' level of experience and clinical practice in eating disorders, and enablers and barriers to CPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Credentialed clinicians found the CPD requirements of the Credential, including supervision and other CPD activities, to be valuable. However, many questioned the sustainability of maintaining the Credential, perceiving the requirements as challenging to meet due to time, cost, or access. There is a need for consideration of how to embed greater flexibility in the CPD requirements to account for a clinician's level of experience, clinicians' developmental needs, and professional circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"13 Suppl 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANZAED eating disorder credentialed clinician perceptions and experiences of professional development.\",\"authors\":\"Janet Conti, Madalyn McCormack, Gabriella Heruc, Katarina Prnjak, Rebecca Barns, Siân A McLean, Phillipa Hay\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40337-025-01307-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential (the Credential) is the first national and cross discipline program to be developed that specifies the standard of qualifications, knowledge, and ongoing professional development activities needed for health professionals to provide safe and effective treatment of eating and feeding disorders. This study explored clinicians' experiences and perspectives of the Credential with a particular focus on the ongoing requirements for clinicians to engage in supervision and other eating disorder specific continuing professional development (CPD) activities to maintain their credentialing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 28 ANZAED Credentialed Eating Disorder Clinicians who participated in a semi-structured interview after completion of an online self-report survey. The interview and survey explored their views on the credentialing of clinicians, motivations to become credentialed, and experiences and perceptions of the CPD requirements. Analysis involved descriptive statistics of survey responses and an inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thematic analysis generated two main themes with three subthemes for each. The first theme explored the clinicians' priorities for CPD including supervisor expertise and competence, the supervisory relationship, and accessing and meeting the requirements for CPD. The second theme was on the clinicians' experiences of CPD focusing specifically on the development of knowledge and competency, support and reflective practice, and the supervisory context. Cutting across these two main themes were the clinicians' level of experience and clinical practice in eating disorders, and enablers and barriers to CPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Credentialed clinicians found the CPD requirements of the Credential, including supervision and other CPD activities, to be valuable. However, many questioned the sustainability of maintaining the Credential, perceiving the requirements as challenging to meet due to time, cost, or access. There is a need for consideration of how to embed greater flexibility in the CPD requirements to account for a clinician's level of experience, clinicians' developmental needs, and professional circumstances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"13 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265107/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-025-01307-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-025-01307-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:ANZAED饮食失调证书(以下简称证书)是第一个国家和跨学科的项目,它规定了卫生专业人员提供安全有效的饮食失调治疗所需的资格、知识和持续的专业发展活动的标准。本研究探讨了临床医生的经验和对证书的看法,特别关注临床医生参与监督和其他饮食失调相关的持续专业发展(CPD)活动以保持其证书的持续要求。方法:参与者是28名ANZAED认证进食障碍临床医生,他们在完成在线自我报告调查后参加了半结构化访谈。访谈和调查探讨了他们对临床医生资格认证的看法,获得资格认证的动机,以及对CPD要求的经验和看法。分析包括对调查结果的描述性统计和对访谈记录的归纳性专题分析。结果:主题分析产生了两个主题,每个主题有三个副主题。第一个主题探讨了临床医生对持续专业发展的优先考虑,包括主管的专业知识和能力、主管关系以及获得和满足持续专业发展的要求。第二个主题是临床医生的持续专业发展经验,特别关注知识和能力的发展,支持和反思实践,以及监管环境。贯穿这两个主题的是临床医生在饮食失调方面的经验水平和临床实践,以及CPD的推动因素和障碍。结论:有资格的临床医生发现该证书的CPD要求,包括监督和其他CPD活动,是有价值的。然而,许多人质疑维护Credential的可持续性,认为由于时间、成本或访问权限的原因,满足这些要求具有挑战性。有必要考虑如何在CPD要求中嵌入更大的灵活性,以考虑临床医生的经验水平、临床医生的发展需求和专业环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANZAED eating disorder credentialed clinician perceptions and experiences of professional development.

Background: The ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential (the Credential) is the first national and cross discipline program to be developed that specifies the standard of qualifications, knowledge, and ongoing professional development activities needed for health professionals to provide safe and effective treatment of eating and feeding disorders. This study explored clinicians' experiences and perspectives of the Credential with a particular focus on the ongoing requirements for clinicians to engage in supervision and other eating disorder specific continuing professional development (CPD) activities to maintain their credentialing.

Methods: Participants were 28 ANZAED Credentialed Eating Disorder Clinicians who participated in a semi-structured interview after completion of an online self-report survey. The interview and survey explored their views on the credentialing of clinicians, motivations to become credentialed, and experiences and perceptions of the CPD requirements. Analysis involved descriptive statistics of survey responses and an inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts.

Results: The thematic analysis generated two main themes with three subthemes for each. The first theme explored the clinicians' priorities for CPD including supervisor expertise and competence, the supervisory relationship, and accessing and meeting the requirements for CPD. The second theme was on the clinicians' experiences of CPD focusing specifically on the development of knowledge and competency, support and reflective practice, and the supervisory context. Cutting across these two main themes were the clinicians' level of experience and clinical practice in eating disorders, and enablers and barriers to CPD.

Conclusions: Credentialed clinicians found the CPD requirements of the Credential, including supervision and other CPD activities, to be valuable. However, many questioned the sustainability of maintaining the Credential, perceiving the requirements as challenging to meet due to time, cost, or access. There is a need for consideration of how to embed greater flexibility in the CPD requirements to account for a clinician's level of experience, clinicians' developmental needs, and professional circumstances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal of Eating Disorders Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信