Janet Conti, Madalyn McCormack, Gabriella Heruc, Katarina Prnjak, Rebecca Barns, Siân A McLean, Phillipa Hay
{"title":"ANZAED饮食失调认证临床医生的看法和经验的专业发展。","authors":"Janet Conti, Madalyn McCormack, Gabriella Heruc, Katarina Prnjak, Rebecca Barns, Siân A McLean, Phillipa Hay","doi":"10.1186/s40337-025-01307-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential (the Credential) is the first national and cross discipline program to be developed that specifies the standard of qualifications, knowledge, and ongoing professional development activities needed for health professionals to provide safe and effective treatment of eating and feeding disorders. This study explored clinicians' experiences and perspectives of the Credential with a particular focus on the ongoing requirements for clinicians to engage in supervision and other eating disorder specific continuing professional development (CPD) activities to maintain their credentialing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 28 ANZAED Credentialed Eating Disorder Clinicians who participated in a semi-structured interview after completion of an online self-report survey. The interview and survey explored their views on the credentialing of clinicians, motivations to become credentialed, and experiences and perceptions of the CPD requirements. Analysis involved descriptive statistics of survey responses and an inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thematic analysis generated two main themes with three subthemes for each. The first theme explored the clinicians' priorities for CPD including supervisor expertise and competence, the supervisory relationship, and accessing and meeting the requirements for CPD. The second theme was on the clinicians' experiences of CPD focusing specifically on the development of knowledge and competency, support and reflective practice, and the supervisory context. Cutting across these two main themes were the clinicians' level of experience and clinical practice in eating disorders, and enablers and barriers to CPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Credentialed clinicians found the CPD requirements of the Credential, including supervision and other CPD activities, to be valuable. However, many questioned the sustainability of maintaining the Credential, perceiving the requirements as challenging to meet due to time, cost, or access. There is a need for consideration of how to embed greater flexibility in the CPD requirements to account for a clinician's level of experience, clinicians' developmental needs, and professional circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"13 Suppl 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANZAED eating disorder credentialed clinician perceptions and experiences of professional development.\",\"authors\":\"Janet Conti, Madalyn McCormack, Gabriella Heruc, Katarina Prnjak, Rebecca Barns, Siân A McLean, Phillipa Hay\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40337-025-01307-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential (the Credential) is the first national and cross discipline program to be developed that specifies the standard of qualifications, knowledge, and ongoing professional development activities needed for health professionals to provide safe and effective treatment of eating and feeding disorders. This study explored clinicians' experiences and perspectives of the Credential with a particular focus on the ongoing requirements for clinicians to engage in supervision and other eating disorder specific continuing professional development (CPD) activities to maintain their credentialing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 28 ANZAED Credentialed Eating Disorder Clinicians who participated in a semi-structured interview after completion of an online self-report survey. The interview and survey explored their views on the credentialing of clinicians, motivations to become credentialed, and experiences and perceptions of the CPD requirements. Analysis involved descriptive statistics of survey responses and an inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thematic analysis generated two main themes with three subthemes for each. The first theme explored the clinicians' priorities for CPD including supervisor expertise and competence, the supervisory relationship, and accessing and meeting the requirements for CPD. The second theme was on the clinicians' experiences of CPD focusing specifically on the development of knowledge and competency, support and reflective practice, and the supervisory context. Cutting across these two main themes were the clinicians' level of experience and clinical practice in eating disorders, and enablers and barriers to CPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Credentialed clinicians found the CPD requirements of the Credential, including supervision and other CPD activities, to be valuable. However, many questioned the sustainability of maintaining the Credential, perceiving the requirements as challenging to meet due to time, cost, or access. There is a need for consideration of how to embed greater flexibility in the CPD requirements to account for a clinician's level of experience, clinicians' developmental needs, and professional circumstances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"13 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265107/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-025-01307-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-025-01307-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
ANZAED eating disorder credentialed clinician perceptions and experiences of professional development.
Background: The ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential (the Credential) is the first national and cross discipline program to be developed that specifies the standard of qualifications, knowledge, and ongoing professional development activities needed for health professionals to provide safe and effective treatment of eating and feeding disorders. This study explored clinicians' experiences and perspectives of the Credential with a particular focus on the ongoing requirements for clinicians to engage in supervision and other eating disorder specific continuing professional development (CPD) activities to maintain their credentialing.
Methods: Participants were 28 ANZAED Credentialed Eating Disorder Clinicians who participated in a semi-structured interview after completion of an online self-report survey. The interview and survey explored their views on the credentialing of clinicians, motivations to become credentialed, and experiences and perceptions of the CPD requirements. Analysis involved descriptive statistics of survey responses and an inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts.
Results: The thematic analysis generated two main themes with three subthemes for each. The first theme explored the clinicians' priorities for CPD including supervisor expertise and competence, the supervisory relationship, and accessing and meeting the requirements for CPD. The second theme was on the clinicians' experiences of CPD focusing specifically on the development of knowledge and competency, support and reflective practice, and the supervisory context. Cutting across these two main themes were the clinicians' level of experience and clinical practice in eating disorders, and enablers and barriers to CPD.
Conclusions: Credentialed clinicians found the CPD requirements of the Credential, including supervision and other CPD activities, to be valuable. However, many questioned the sustainability of maintaining the Credential, perceiving the requirements as challenging to meet due to time, cost, or access. There is a need for consideration of how to embed greater flexibility in the CPD requirements to account for a clinician's level of experience, clinicians' developmental needs, and professional circumstances.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice.
The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.