与信念和实施护士循证实践相关的因素:一项横断面研究。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Manisha Mehra, C Bellson Raj, Rimple Sharma, Anuj Singh, Surya Kant Tiwari
{"title":"与信念和实施护士循证实践相关的因素:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Manisha Mehra, C Bellson Raj, Rimple Sharma, Anuj Singh, Surya Kant Tiwari","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03596-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is vital for improving patient outcomes and healthcare quality. However, its integration remains limited in many settings, particularly in developing countries. This study aimed to assess EBP beliefs and implementation among nurses in India and identify associated sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, a tertiary care hospital in Northern India, with 220 nurses completing validated scales measuring EBP beliefs and implementation. The inclusion criteria were nurses working in intensive care units or wards who met the shift requirements and volunteered to participate. Data were collected using self-administered, paper-based questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, cluster analysis, correlation analysis, analysis of variance, and multiple regression were used to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cluster analysis revealed that 46.8% (103/220) of nurses had poor EBP beliefs, and 37.7% (83/220) demonstrated good implementation. Factors positively correlated with implementation were resource beliefs (r = 0.155, p = 0.021), EBP value beliefs (r = 0.140, p = 0.038), and difficulty/time beliefs (r = 0.158, p = 0.019). Nurses with > 5 years' experience scored significantly higher on both beliefs (56.27 ± 16.98) and implementation (51.01 ± 12.65) than less experienced nurses (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis identified professional experience as a significant predictor of EBP beliefs (β = 0.174, p = 0.023) and implementation (β = 0.262, p = 0.001), after adjusting for other factors. Other sociodemographic variables, including sex, marital status, education, and designation, were not significantly associated with EBP beliefs and implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite good levels of EBP implementation, nearly half of the nurses exhibited poor beliefs about EBP. Professional experience was the strongest predictor of both EBP belief and implementation. These findings highlight the importance of targeted interventions, such as structured mentorship, continuing education, and hands-on training, to support less-experienced nurses in adopting EBP. Strengthening these competencies may enhance clinical decision-making and ultimately improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"929"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with beliefs and implementation of evidence-based practice among nurses: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Manisha Mehra, C Bellson Raj, Rimple Sharma, Anuj Singh, Surya Kant Tiwari\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12912-025-03596-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is vital for improving patient outcomes and healthcare quality. However, its integration remains limited in many settings, particularly in developing countries. This study aimed to assess EBP beliefs and implementation among nurses in India and identify associated sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, a tertiary care hospital in Northern India, with 220 nurses completing validated scales measuring EBP beliefs and implementation. The inclusion criteria were nurses working in intensive care units or wards who met the shift requirements and volunteered to participate. Data were collected using self-administered, paper-based questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, cluster analysis, correlation analysis, analysis of variance, and multiple regression were used to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cluster analysis revealed that 46.8% (103/220) of nurses had poor EBP beliefs, and 37.7% (83/220) demonstrated good implementation. Factors positively correlated with implementation were resource beliefs (r = 0.155, p = 0.021), EBP value beliefs (r = 0.140, p = 0.038), and difficulty/time beliefs (r = 0.158, p = 0.019). Nurses with > 5 years' experience scored significantly higher on both beliefs (56.27 ± 16.98) and implementation (51.01 ± 12.65) than less experienced nurses (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis identified professional experience as a significant predictor of EBP beliefs (β = 0.174, p = 0.023) and implementation (β = 0.262, p = 0.001), after adjusting for other factors. Other sociodemographic variables, including sex, marital status, education, and designation, were not significantly associated with EBP beliefs and implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite good levels of EBP implementation, nearly half of the nurses exhibited poor beliefs about EBP. Professional experience was the strongest predictor of both EBP belief and implementation. These findings highlight the importance of targeted interventions, such as structured mentorship, continuing education, and hands-on training, to support less-experienced nurses in adopting EBP. Strengthening these competencies may enhance clinical decision-making and ultimately improve patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"929\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269217/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03596-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03596-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:循证实践(EBP)对改善患者预后和医疗质量至关重要。然而,在许多情况下,特别是在发展中国家,它的整合仍然有限。本研究旨在评估印度护士的EBP信念和实施情况,并确定相关的社会人口因素。方法:在印度北部新德里三级医院全印度医学科学研究所进行横断面调查,220名护士完成有效的EBP信念和实施量表。纳入标准是在重症监护病房或病房工作的护士,符合轮班要求并自愿参加。数据是通过自我管理的纸质问卷收集的。采用描述性统计、聚类分析、相关分析、方差分析、多元回归等方法对数据进行分析。结果:聚类分析显示,46.8%(103/220)的护士EBP信念不佳,37.7%(83/220)的护士执行良好。资源信念(r = 0.155, p = 0.021)、EBP价值信念(r = 0.140, p = 0.038)、难度/时间信念(r = 0.158, p = 0.019)与执行力呈正相关。5年工作经验的护士在信念(56.27±16.98)和实施(51.01±12.65)两方面得分均显著高于经验不足的护士(p)。结论:尽管有良好的EBP实施水平,但近一半的护士对EBP的信念较差。职业经验是EBP信念和实施的最强预测因子。这些发现强调了有针对性的干预措施的重要性,如结构化指导、继续教育和实践培训,以支持经验不足的护士采用EBP。加强这些能力可以提高临床决策,并最终改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with beliefs and implementation of evidence-based practice among nurses: a cross-sectional study.

Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is vital for improving patient outcomes and healthcare quality. However, its integration remains limited in many settings, particularly in developing countries. This study aimed to assess EBP beliefs and implementation among nurses in India and identify associated sociodemographic factors.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, a tertiary care hospital in Northern India, with 220 nurses completing validated scales measuring EBP beliefs and implementation. The inclusion criteria were nurses working in intensive care units or wards who met the shift requirements and volunteered to participate. Data were collected using self-administered, paper-based questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, cluster analysis, correlation analysis, analysis of variance, and multiple regression were used to analyze data.

Results: Cluster analysis revealed that 46.8% (103/220) of nurses had poor EBP beliefs, and 37.7% (83/220) demonstrated good implementation. Factors positively correlated with implementation were resource beliefs (r = 0.155, p = 0.021), EBP value beliefs (r = 0.140, p = 0.038), and difficulty/time beliefs (r = 0.158, p = 0.019). Nurses with > 5 years' experience scored significantly higher on both beliefs (56.27 ± 16.98) and implementation (51.01 ± 12.65) than less experienced nurses (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis identified professional experience as a significant predictor of EBP beliefs (β = 0.174, p = 0.023) and implementation (β = 0.262, p = 0.001), after adjusting for other factors. Other sociodemographic variables, including sex, marital status, education, and designation, were not significantly associated with EBP beliefs and implementation.

Conclusions: Despite good levels of EBP implementation, nearly half of the nurses exhibited poor beliefs about EBP. Professional experience was the strongest predictor of both EBP belief and implementation. These findings highlight the importance of targeted interventions, such as structured mentorship, continuing education, and hands-on training, to support less-experienced nurses in adopting EBP. Strengthening these competencies may enhance clinical decision-making and ultimately improve patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信