基于CT特征、放射组学和深度学习的肺部多发性磨玻璃结节生长预测模型的开发和验证。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2025-06-30 Epub Date: 2025-06-26 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-1039
Shulei Cui, Linlin Qi, Weixiong Tan, Yujian Wang, Fenglan Li, Jianing Liu, Jiaqi Chen, Sainan Cheng, Zhen Zhou, Jianwei Wang
{"title":"基于CT特征、放射组学和深度学习的肺部多发性磨玻璃结节生长预测模型的开发和验证。","authors":"Shulei Cui, Linlin Qi, Weixiong Tan, Yujian Wang, Fenglan Li, Jianing Liu, Jiaqi Chen, Sainan Cheng, Zhen Zhou, Jianwei Wang","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-1039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of growth prediction models for multiple pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) could help predict their growth patterns and facilitate more precise identification of nodules that require close monitoring or early intervention. Previous studies have demonstrated the indolent growth pattern of GGNs and developed growth prediction models; however, these investigations predominantly focused on solitary GGN. This study aimed to investigate the natural history of multiple pulmonary GGNs and develop and validate growth prediction models based on computed tomography (CT) features, radiomics, and deep learning (DL) as well as compare their predictive performances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with two or more persistent GGNs who underwent CT scans between October 2010 and November 2023 and had at least 3 years of follow-up without radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The growth of GGN is defined as an increase in mean diameter by at least 2 mm, an increase in volume by at least 30%, or the emergence or enlargement of a solid component by at least 2 mm. Based on the interval changes during follow-up, the enrolled patients and GGNs were categorized into growth and non-growth groups. The data were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Clinical model, Radiomics model, DL model, Clinical-Radiomics model, and Clinical-DL model were constructed. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 732 GGNs [mean diameter (interquartile range, IQR), 5.5 (4.5-6.5) mm] from 231 patients (mean age 54.1±9.9 years; 26.4% male, 73.6% female) were included. Of the 156 (156/231, 67.5%) patients with GGN growth, the fastest-growing GGN had a volume doubling time (VDT) and mass doubling time (MDT) of 2,285 (IQR, 1,369-3,545) and 2,438 (IQR, 1,361-4,140) days, respectively. Among the growing 272 (272/732, 37.2%) GGNs, the median VDT and MDT were 2,934 (IQR, 1,648-4,491) and 2,875 (IQR, 1,619-5,148) days, respectively. Lobulation (P=0.049), vacuole (P=0.009), initial volume (P=0.01), and mass (P=0.01) were risk factors of GGN growth. The sensitivity and specificity of the Clinical model 1, Clinical model 2, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-Radiomics, and Clinical-DL models were 77.2% and 80.0%, 77.2% and 79.3%, 75.9% and 77.8%, 59.5% and 75.6%, 82.3% and 86.7%, 78.5% and 80.7%, respectively. The AUC for Clinical model 1, Clinical model 2, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-Radiomics, and Clinical-DL models were 0.876, 0.869, 0.845, 0.735, 0.908, and 0.887, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple pulmonary GGNs exhibit indolent biological behaviour. The Clinical-Radiomics model demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting the growth of multiple GGNs compared to Clinical, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-DL models.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"14 6","pages":"1929-1944"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of growth prediction models for multiple pulmonary ground-glass nodules based on CT features, radiomics, and deep learning.\",\"authors\":\"Shulei Cui, Linlin Qi, Weixiong Tan, Yujian Wang, Fenglan Li, Jianing Liu, Jiaqi Chen, Sainan Cheng, Zhen Zhou, Jianwei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tlcr-24-1039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of growth prediction models for multiple pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) could help predict their growth patterns and facilitate more precise identification of nodules that require close monitoring or early intervention. Previous studies have demonstrated the indolent growth pattern of GGNs and developed growth prediction models; however, these investigations predominantly focused on solitary GGN. This study aimed to investigate the natural history of multiple pulmonary GGNs and develop and validate growth prediction models based on computed tomography (CT) features, radiomics, and deep learning (DL) as well as compare their predictive performances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with two or more persistent GGNs who underwent CT scans between October 2010 and November 2023 and had at least 3 years of follow-up without radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The growth of GGN is defined as an increase in mean diameter by at least 2 mm, an increase in volume by at least 30%, or the emergence or enlargement of a solid component by at least 2 mm. Based on the interval changes during follow-up, the enrolled patients and GGNs were categorized into growth and non-growth groups. The data were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Clinical model, Radiomics model, DL model, Clinical-Radiomics model, and Clinical-DL model were constructed. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 732 GGNs [mean diameter (interquartile range, IQR), 5.5 (4.5-6.5) mm] from 231 patients (mean age 54.1±9.9 years; 26.4% male, 73.6% female) were included. Of the 156 (156/231, 67.5%) patients with GGN growth, the fastest-growing GGN had a volume doubling time (VDT) and mass doubling time (MDT) of 2,285 (IQR, 1,369-3,545) and 2,438 (IQR, 1,361-4,140) days, respectively. Among the growing 272 (272/732, 37.2%) GGNs, the median VDT and MDT were 2,934 (IQR, 1,648-4,491) and 2,875 (IQR, 1,619-5,148) days, respectively. Lobulation (P=0.049), vacuole (P=0.009), initial volume (P=0.01), and mass (P=0.01) were risk factors of GGN growth. The sensitivity and specificity of the Clinical model 1, Clinical model 2, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-Radiomics, and Clinical-DL models were 77.2% and 80.0%, 77.2% and 79.3%, 75.9% and 77.8%, 59.5% and 75.6%, 82.3% and 86.7%, 78.5% and 80.7%, respectively. The AUC for Clinical model 1, Clinical model 2, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-Radiomics, and Clinical-DL models were 0.876, 0.869, 0.845, 0.735, 0.908, and 0.887, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple pulmonary GGNs exhibit indolent biological behaviour. The Clinical-Radiomics model demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting the growth of multiple GGNs compared to Clinical, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-DL models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"1929-1944\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261256/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-1039\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-1039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:建立肺部多发磨玻璃结节(ggn)生长预测模型有助于预测其生长模式,并有助于更准确地识别需要密切监测或早期干预的结节。已有研究证实了ggn的惰性生长模式,并建立了生长预测模型;然而,这些研究主要集中在孤立的GGN上。本研究旨在探讨多发性肺ggn的自然历史,建立并验证基于计算机断层扫描(CT)特征、放射组学和深度学习(DL)的生长预测模型,并比较它们的预测性能。方法:回顾性分析2010年10月至2023年11月期间接受CT扫描且随访至少3年且无放疗、化疗或手术的2例或2例以上持续性ggn患者。GGN的生长定义为平均直径增加至少2mm,体积增加至少30%,或出现或扩大至少2mm的固体成分。根据随访期间的间隔变化,将入组患者和ggn分为生长组和非生长组。数据按7:3的比例随机分为训练集和验证集。构建临床模型、放射组学模型、DL模型、临床-放射组学模型、临床-DL模型。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型性能。结果:231例患者(平均年龄54.1±9.9岁;男性26.4%,女性73.6%)。在156例(156/231,67.5%)GGN生长的患者中,增长最快的GGN的体积加倍时间(VDT)和质量加倍时间(MDT)分别为2,285 (IQR, 1,369-3,545)天和2,438 (IQR, 1,361-4,140)天。在增加的272例(272/732,37.2%)ggn中,VDT和MDT的中位数分别为2,934 (IQR, 1,648-4,491)天和2,875 (IQR, 1,619-5,148)天。分叶(P=0.049)、液泡(P=0.009)、初始体积(P=0.01)和质量(P=0.01)是GGN生长的危险因素。临床模型1、临床模型2、放射组学、DL、临床-放射组学和临床-DL模型的敏感性和特异性分别为77.2%和80.0%、77.2%和79.3%、75.9%和77.8%、59.5%和75.6%、82.3%和86.7%、78.5%和80.7%。临床模型1、临床模型2、放射组学、DL、临床-放射组学和临床-DL模型的AUC分别为0.876、0.869、0.845、0.735、0.908和0.887。结论:肺部多发ggn表现为惰性生物学行为。与临床、放射组学、DL、临床-DL模型相比,临床-放射组学模型在预测多个ggn生长方面具有更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development and validation of growth prediction models for multiple pulmonary ground-glass nodules based on CT features, radiomics, and deep learning.

Development and validation of growth prediction models for multiple pulmonary ground-glass nodules based on CT features, radiomics, and deep learning.

Development and validation of growth prediction models for multiple pulmonary ground-glass nodules based on CT features, radiomics, and deep learning.

Development and validation of growth prediction models for multiple pulmonary ground-glass nodules based on CT features, radiomics, and deep learning.

Background: The development of growth prediction models for multiple pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) could help predict their growth patterns and facilitate more precise identification of nodules that require close monitoring or early intervention. Previous studies have demonstrated the indolent growth pattern of GGNs and developed growth prediction models; however, these investigations predominantly focused on solitary GGN. This study aimed to investigate the natural history of multiple pulmonary GGNs and develop and validate growth prediction models based on computed tomography (CT) features, radiomics, and deep learning (DL) as well as compare their predictive performances.

Methods: Patients with two or more persistent GGNs who underwent CT scans between October 2010 and November 2023 and had at least 3 years of follow-up without radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The growth of GGN is defined as an increase in mean diameter by at least 2 mm, an increase in volume by at least 30%, or the emergence or enlargement of a solid component by at least 2 mm. Based on the interval changes during follow-up, the enrolled patients and GGNs were categorized into growth and non-growth groups. The data were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Clinical model, Radiomics model, DL model, Clinical-Radiomics model, and Clinical-DL model were constructed. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: A total of 732 GGNs [mean diameter (interquartile range, IQR), 5.5 (4.5-6.5) mm] from 231 patients (mean age 54.1±9.9 years; 26.4% male, 73.6% female) were included. Of the 156 (156/231, 67.5%) patients with GGN growth, the fastest-growing GGN had a volume doubling time (VDT) and mass doubling time (MDT) of 2,285 (IQR, 1,369-3,545) and 2,438 (IQR, 1,361-4,140) days, respectively. Among the growing 272 (272/732, 37.2%) GGNs, the median VDT and MDT were 2,934 (IQR, 1,648-4,491) and 2,875 (IQR, 1,619-5,148) days, respectively. Lobulation (P=0.049), vacuole (P=0.009), initial volume (P=0.01), and mass (P=0.01) were risk factors of GGN growth. The sensitivity and specificity of the Clinical model 1, Clinical model 2, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-Radiomics, and Clinical-DL models were 77.2% and 80.0%, 77.2% and 79.3%, 75.9% and 77.8%, 59.5% and 75.6%, 82.3% and 86.7%, 78.5% and 80.7%, respectively. The AUC for Clinical model 1, Clinical model 2, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-Radiomics, and Clinical-DL models were 0.876, 0.869, 0.845, 0.735, 0.908, and 0.887, respectively.

Conclusions: Multiple pulmonary GGNs exhibit indolent biological behaviour. The Clinical-Radiomics model demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting the growth of multiple GGNs compared to Clinical, Radiomics, DL, Clinical-DL models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信