医学专业人员和药物干预治疗失眠:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.8 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sleep Science Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1791238
Antonios Liaskopoulos, Vasileios Kakouris, Nikolaos Liaskopoulos, Andreas S Lappas, Nikolaos Christodoulou, Myrto Samara
{"title":"医学专业人员和药物干预治疗失眠:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Antonios Liaskopoulos, Vasileios Kakouris, Nikolaos Liaskopoulos, Andreas S Lappas, Nikolaos Christodoulou, Myrto Samara","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  To explore the preferences of medical practitioners concerning various medications and other remedies to manage insomnia, and to ascertain whether these preferences are associated with their respective medical specialties. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  Employing the snowball sampling technique, we administered two versions of a questionnaire to an international group of medical professionals, including trainees and specialists from diverse medical backgrounds. <b>Results</b>  Zopiclone, zolpidem, and mirtazapine were evaluated as the most effective treatments for insomnia, while physicians would typically avoid using other tricyclic antidepressants, dual orexin receptor antagonists, and tryptophan for insomnia treatment. Noteworthy statistical correlations between physicians' specialty and preferred drug therapy, were observed in three out of five cases: 1) first-line drug treatment for short-term intervention against insomnia; (2) second-line treatment for long-term intervention; and 3) cases involving the elderly. <b>Discussion</b>  Psychiatrists demonstrated a greater preference for antipsychotics and antidepressants for the treatment of insomnia compared with other physicians. Conversely, other medical professionals exhibited a preference for benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (zopiclone and zolpidem). Although Z-drugs were evaluated as the most effective in the treatment of insomnia, in the clinical practice, physicians administer or would administer antidepressant or antipsychotic drugs more often (mirtazapine and quetiapine respectively). Regarding Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonists (DORAs), the high prevalence of \"Do not know/No opinion\" answers implies that our sample was not familiar with this innovative treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21848,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Science","volume":"18 2","pages":"e155-e164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Professionals and Pharmacological Intervention for the Treatment of Insomnia: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Antonios Liaskopoulos, Vasileios Kakouris, Nikolaos Liaskopoulos, Andreas S Lappas, Nikolaos Christodoulou, Myrto Samara\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1791238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  To explore the preferences of medical practitioners concerning various medications and other remedies to manage insomnia, and to ascertain whether these preferences are associated with their respective medical specialties. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  Employing the snowball sampling technique, we administered two versions of a questionnaire to an international group of medical professionals, including trainees and specialists from diverse medical backgrounds. <b>Results</b>  Zopiclone, zolpidem, and mirtazapine were evaluated as the most effective treatments for insomnia, while physicians would typically avoid using other tricyclic antidepressants, dual orexin receptor antagonists, and tryptophan for insomnia treatment. Noteworthy statistical correlations between physicians' specialty and preferred drug therapy, were observed in three out of five cases: 1) first-line drug treatment for short-term intervention against insomnia; (2) second-line treatment for long-term intervention; and 3) cases involving the elderly. <b>Discussion</b>  Psychiatrists demonstrated a greater preference for antipsychotics and antidepressants for the treatment of insomnia compared with other physicians. Conversely, other medical professionals exhibited a preference for benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (zopiclone and zolpidem). Although Z-drugs were evaluated as the most effective in the treatment of insomnia, in the clinical practice, physicians administer or would administer antidepressant or antipsychotic drugs more often (mirtazapine and quetiapine respectively). Regarding Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonists (DORAs), the high prevalence of \\\"Do not know/No opinion\\\" answers implies that our sample was not familiar with this innovative treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep Science\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"e155-e164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263209/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨医生对治疗失眠症的各种药物和其他补救措施的偏好,并确定这些偏好是否与他们各自的医学专业有关。材料和方法采用滚雪球抽样技术,我们对一组国际医疗专业人员(包括来自不同医学背景的实习生和专家)进行了两种版本的问卷调查。结果左匹克隆、唑吡坦和米氮平被认为是治疗失眠最有效的药物,而医生通常会避免使用其他三环抗抑郁药、双食欲素受体拮抗剂和色氨酸来治疗失眠。5例患者中有3例的专科与首选药物治疗有显著的统计学相关性:1)一线药物治疗短期干预失眠;(2)长期干预的二线治疗;3)涉及老年人的案件。与其他医生相比,精神科医生更倾向于使用抗精神病药和抗抑郁药来治疗失眠。相反,其他医疗专业人员表现出对苯二氮卓类药物和z型药物(佐匹克隆和唑吡坦)的偏好。虽然z -药物被评估为治疗失眠最有效的药物,但在临床实践中,医生更经常使用或将使用抗抑郁药或抗精神病药物(分别为米氮平和喹硫平)。关于双食欲素受体拮抗剂(DORAs),“不知道/没有意见”的回答的高患病率意味着我们的样本不熟悉这种创新治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical Professionals and Pharmacological Intervention for the Treatment of Insomnia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objective  To explore the preferences of medical practitioners concerning various medications and other remedies to manage insomnia, and to ascertain whether these preferences are associated with their respective medical specialties. Materials and Methods  Employing the snowball sampling technique, we administered two versions of a questionnaire to an international group of medical professionals, including trainees and specialists from diverse medical backgrounds. Results  Zopiclone, zolpidem, and mirtazapine were evaluated as the most effective treatments for insomnia, while physicians would typically avoid using other tricyclic antidepressants, dual orexin receptor antagonists, and tryptophan for insomnia treatment. Noteworthy statistical correlations between physicians' specialty and preferred drug therapy, were observed in three out of five cases: 1) first-line drug treatment for short-term intervention against insomnia; (2) second-line treatment for long-term intervention; and 3) cases involving the elderly. Discussion  Psychiatrists demonstrated a greater preference for antipsychotics and antidepressants for the treatment of insomnia compared with other physicians. Conversely, other medical professionals exhibited a preference for benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (zopiclone and zolpidem). Although Z-drugs were evaluated as the most effective in the treatment of insomnia, in the clinical practice, physicians administer or would administer antidepressant or antipsychotic drugs more often (mirtazapine and quetiapine respectively). Regarding Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonists (DORAs), the high prevalence of "Do not know/No opinion" answers implies that our sample was not familiar with this innovative treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Science
Sleep Science CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信