评估3d打印聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯树脂在抛光和涂层后三个打印方向上的表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性:体外研究。

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Pooja Chauhan, P Jaya Krishna Babu, Lokesh Sunkara, Kiran Rathore, Vimal Kumar
{"title":"评估3d打印聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯树脂在抛光和涂层后三个打印方向上的表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性:体外研究。","authors":"Pooja Chauhan, P Jaya Krishna Babu, Lokesh Sunkara, Kiran Rathore, Vimal Kumar","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_396_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study delves into how different printing orientations following polishing and coating affect surface roughness and color stability, aiming to refine fabrication methods and enhance patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>Twenty-seven polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin samples were designed with dimensions of 10 mm × 2 mm and were 3D printed with three different printing orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°), followed by support removal and polishing. After the evaluation, the samples were coated with the layer of PMMA resin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Standard tessellation language files as the basis for sample preparation were generated using the Autodesk Meshmixer software and exported to 3D printer for the AM of the specimens. The samples underwent assessment for surface roughness and color stability, forming the three groups with different printing orientations. Subsequently, each sample was coated with unpolymerized PMMA resin and polymerized with ultraviolet light, forming the other three groups following coating. After this process, the samples were reevaluated for surface properties, forming the basis of the study's six distinct groups.</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses used: </strong>The data was tabulated and evaluated for the mean and the standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon statistical analysis, the surface roughness of 3D printed polished PMMA resin polished and coated PMMA resin for all printing orientations (P < 0.001). The surface roughness was highest at a 45° angle, followed by 90°, with the lowest roughness observed at 0°. Similarly, in polished and coated PMMA resin, roughness was significantly higher at 45° compared to 0° and 90° but no significant difference between 0° and 90° (P > 0.05). For the color stability parameter, color change (∆E) values showed no significant difference for the three printing orientations (P > 0.05) and among the six study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different printing orientation markedly affects surface roughness and color stability, while coating with PMMA resin had significantly reduced the surface roughness without a significant impact on color stability. Thus, meticulous selection of printing orientation is essential for achieving desired surface properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"25 3","pages":"198-203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To evaluate the surface roughness and color stability of 3D-printed polymethyl methacrylate resin at three printing orientations following polishing and coating: An in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Chauhan, P Jaya Krishna Babu, Lokesh Sunkara, Kiran Rathore, Vimal Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jips.jips_396_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study delves into how different printing orientations following polishing and coating affect surface roughness and color stability, aiming to refine fabrication methods and enhance patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>Twenty-seven polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin samples were designed with dimensions of 10 mm × 2 mm and were 3D printed with three different printing orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°), followed by support removal and polishing. After the evaluation, the samples were coated with the layer of PMMA resin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Standard tessellation language files as the basis for sample preparation were generated using the Autodesk Meshmixer software and exported to 3D printer for the AM of the specimens. The samples underwent assessment for surface roughness and color stability, forming the three groups with different printing orientations. Subsequently, each sample was coated with unpolymerized PMMA resin and polymerized with ultraviolet light, forming the other three groups following coating. After this process, the samples were reevaluated for surface properties, forming the basis of the study's six distinct groups.</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses used: </strong>The data was tabulated and evaluated for the mean and the standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon statistical analysis, the surface roughness of 3D printed polished PMMA resin polished and coated PMMA resin for all printing orientations (P < 0.001). The surface roughness was highest at a 45° angle, followed by 90°, with the lowest roughness observed at 0°. Similarly, in polished and coated PMMA resin, roughness was significantly higher at 45° compared to 0° and 90° but no significant difference between 0° and 90° (P > 0.05). For the color stability parameter, color change (∆E) values showed no significant difference for the three printing orientations (P > 0.05) and among the six study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different printing orientation markedly affects surface roughness and color stability, while coating with PMMA resin had significantly reduced the surface roughness without a significant impact on color stability. Thus, meticulous selection of printing orientation is essential for achieving desired surface properties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"198-203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370112/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_396_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_396_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究抛光和涂层后不同印刷方向对表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性的影响,旨在改进制造方法,提高患者满意度。研究设置和设计:设计27个尺寸为10 mm × 2 mm的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)树脂样品,并以三种不同的打印方向(0°,45°和90°)进行3D打印,然后去除支撑并进行抛光。评价结束后,在样品上涂上一层PMMA树脂。材料和方法:使用Autodesk Meshmixer软件生成标准镶嵌语言文件,作为样品制备的基础,并导出到3D打印机进行样品的AM。样品进行了表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性的评估,形成了三组不同的印刷方向。随后,每个样品涂覆未聚合的PMMA树脂,并在紫外光下聚合,形成涂层后的其他三组。在此过程之后,对样品的表面特性进行了重新评估,形成了研究的六个不同组的基础。使用的统计分析:将数据制成表格并评估平均值和标准差。结果:经统计分析,3D打印抛光PMMA树脂抛光和涂层PMMA树脂在所有打印方向上的表面粗糙度(P < 0.001)。表面粗糙度在45°角处最高,其次是90°角,在0°角处粗糙度最低。同样,在抛光和涂覆的PMMA树脂中,与0°和90°相比,45°的粗糙度显着高于0°和90°,但0°和90°之间没有显著差异(P < 0.05)。对于颜色稳定性参数,三种印刷方向和六个研究组之间的颜色变化(∆E)值无显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:不同的印刷方向会显著影响表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性,而PMMA树脂涂层可以显著降低表面粗糙度,但对颜色稳定性没有明显影响。因此,精心选择印刷方向是实现所需表面性能的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

To evaluate the surface roughness and color stability of 3D-printed polymethyl methacrylate resin at three printing orientations following polishing and coating: An in vitro study.

To evaluate the surface roughness and color stability of 3D-printed polymethyl methacrylate resin at three printing orientations following polishing and coating: An in vitro study.

To evaluate the surface roughness and color stability of 3D-printed polymethyl methacrylate resin at three printing orientations following polishing and coating: An in vitro study.

To evaluate the surface roughness and color stability of 3D-printed polymethyl methacrylate resin at three printing orientations following polishing and coating: An in vitro study.

Aim: This study delves into how different printing orientations following polishing and coating affect surface roughness and color stability, aiming to refine fabrication methods and enhance patient satisfaction.

Study setting and design: Twenty-seven polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin samples were designed with dimensions of 10 mm × 2 mm and were 3D printed with three different printing orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°), followed by support removal and polishing. After the evaluation, the samples were coated with the layer of PMMA resin.

Materials and methods: Standard tessellation language files as the basis for sample preparation were generated using the Autodesk Meshmixer software and exported to 3D printer for the AM of the specimens. The samples underwent assessment for surface roughness and color stability, forming the three groups with different printing orientations. Subsequently, each sample was coated with unpolymerized PMMA resin and polymerized with ultraviolet light, forming the other three groups following coating. After this process, the samples were reevaluated for surface properties, forming the basis of the study's six distinct groups.

Statistical analyses used: The data was tabulated and evaluated for the mean and the standard deviation.

Results: Upon statistical analysis, the surface roughness of 3D printed polished PMMA resin polished and coated PMMA resin for all printing orientations (P < 0.001). The surface roughness was highest at a 45° angle, followed by 90°, with the lowest roughness observed at 0°. Similarly, in polished and coated PMMA resin, roughness was significantly higher at 45° compared to 0° and 90° but no significant difference between 0° and 90° (P > 0.05). For the color stability parameter, color change (∆E) values showed no significant difference for the three printing orientations (P > 0.05) and among the six study groups.

Conclusions: Different printing orientation markedly affects surface roughness and color stability, while coating with PMMA resin had significantly reduced the surface roughness without a significant impact on color stability. Thus, meticulous selection of printing orientation is essential for achieving desired surface properties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信