一项初步研究比较传统和数字印象技术的语音分析使用印地语元音在上颌切除术患者康复与闭孔。

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI:10.4103/jips.jips_64_25
Gunjan Chouksey, Gurkaran Preet Singh, Vikas Gupta, Prasanta Sahoo, Rupali Choure, Anima Goyal
{"title":"一项初步研究比较传统和数字印象技术的语音分析使用印地语元音在上颌切除术患者康复与闭孔。","authors":"Gunjan Chouksey, Gurkaran Preet Singh, Vikas Gupta, Prasanta Sahoo, Rupali Choure, Anima Goyal","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_64_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Maxillectomy patients frequently have speech impairments resulting from the loss of the oral-nasal partition. Prosthodontic rehabilitation with an obturator helps restore speech intelligibility, with its success largely dependent on accurate impression recording of maxillary defects. This investigation evaluated the effectiveness of conventional versus digital impression techniques in the context of speech analysis, specifically using Hindi vowels, in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with obturators.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>This research, designed as a quasi-experimental study, was undertaken at a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 20 patients needing obturators, assigned to two groups: one received prostheses fabricated with conventional impressions, and the other with digital techniques. Speech parameters, including fundamental frequency, formant frequencies (F1, F2, F3), intensity, jitter, shimmer, and maximum phonation duration (MPD), were analyzed using Praat software before and three months after rehabilitation. Hindi vowels aa /a:/, ii /i:/, and uu /u:/ were sustained at a controlled intensity. Swallowing efficiency was assessed via the water swallow test.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The Wilcoxon Rank Sum test or exact test was used to compare the data, with a p-value < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common maxillectomy defects were Brown class 2b. After three months, significant improvement in speech parameters and swallowing efficiency was seen in both groups of participants. However, no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were found between the conventional and digital impression groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel study compared conventional and digital impressions for speech analysis using Hindi vowels in maxillectomy patients after rehabilitation with an obturator. Voice recording and acoustic analysis using Hindi vowels provide valuable insights into speech rehabilitation outcomes in maxillectomy patients. Both conventional and digital impression techniques effectively fabricate obturators, improving speech characteristics and intelligibility. Both methods can be used for maxillectomy patients, allowing flexibility in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"25 3","pages":"266-275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pilot study comparing conventional and digital impression techniques for speech analysis using Hindi vowels in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with an obturator.\",\"authors\":\"Gunjan Chouksey, Gurkaran Preet Singh, Vikas Gupta, Prasanta Sahoo, Rupali Choure, Anima Goyal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jips.jips_64_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Maxillectomy patients frequently have speech impairments resulting from the loss of the oral-nasal partition. Prosthodontic rehabilitation with an obturator helps restore speech intelligibility, with its success largely dependent on accurate impression recording of maxillary defects. This investigation evaluated the effectiveness of conventional versus digital impression techniques in the context of speech analysis, specifically using Hindi vowels, in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with obturators.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>This research, designed as a quasi-experimental study, was undertaken at a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 20 patients needing obturators, assigned to two groups: one received prostheses fabricated with conventional impressions, and the other with digital techniques. Speech parameters, including fundamental frequency, formant frequencies (F1, F2, F3), intensity, jitter, shimmer, and maximum phonation duration (MPD), were analyzed using Praat software before and three months after rehabilitation. Hindi vowels aa /a:/, ii /i:/, and uu /u:/ were sustained at a controlled intensity. Swallowing efficiency was assessed via the water swallow test.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The Wilcoxon Rank Sum test or exact test was used to compare the data, with a p-value < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common maxillectomy defects were Brown class 2b. After three months, significant improvement in speech parameters and swallowing efficiency was seen in both groups of participants. However, no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were found between the conventional and digital impression groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel study compared conventional and digital impressions for speech analysis using Hindi vowels in maxillectomy patients after rehabilitation with an obturator. Voice recording and acoustic analysis using Hindi vowels provide valuable insights into speech rehabilitation outcomes in maxillectomy patients. Both conventional and digital impression techniques effectively fabricate obturators, improving speech characteristics and intelligibility. Both methods can be used for maxillectomy patients, allowing flexibility in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"266-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370098/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_64_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_64_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:上颌切除术后,由于失去了口鼻分隔,患者经常出现语言障碍。采用闭孔修复有助于恢复言语清晰度,其成功与否很大程度上取决于上颌缺损的准确印象记录。本研究评估了传统印象技术与数字印象技术在语音分析的背景下的有效性,特别是使用印地语元音,在上颌切除术患者的闭孔康复中。研究环境和设计:本研究设计为准实验研究,在一家三级护理医院进行。材料和方法:该研究包括20名需要闭孔的患者,分为两组:一组使用传统印象制作的假体,另一组使用数字技术。使用Praat软件分析康复前和康复后3个月的语音参数,包括基频、共振峰频率(F1、F2、F3)、强度、抖动、闪烁和最大发声持续时间(MPD)。印地语元音aa /a:/、ii /i:/和uu /u:/以可控的强度持续。通过水吞试验评估吞咽效率。采用统计学分析:采用Wilcoxon秩和检验或精确检验比较资料,p值< 0.05为显著性。结果:最常见的上颌切除缺损为Brown 2b类。三个月后,两组参与者的语言参数和吞咽效率都有显著改善。然而,传统印模组与数字印模组之间无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。结论:这项新颖的研究比较了传统印象和数字印象在上颌切除术患者闭孔康复后使用印地语元音进行语音分析。使用印地语元音录音和声学分析为上颌切除术患者的语言康复结果提供了有价值的见解。传统和数字印象技术都有效地制造了闭孔,改善了语音特征和可理解性。两种方法均可用于上颌切除术患者,在临床实践中具有灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A pilot study comparing conventional and digital impression techniques for speech analysis using Hindi vowels in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with an obturator.

A pilot study comparing conventional and digital impression techniques for speech analysis using Hindi vowels in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with an obturator.

A pilot study comparing conventional and digital impression techniques for speech analysis using Hindi vowels in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with an obturator.

A pilot study comparing conventional and digital impression techniques for speech analysis using Hindi vowels in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with an obturator.

Aim: Maxillectomy patients frequently have speech impairments resulting from the loss of the oral-nasal partition. Prosthodontic rehabilitation with an obturator helps restore speech intelligibility, with its success largely dependent on accurate impression recording of maxillary defects. This investigation evaluated the effectiveness of conventional versus digital impression techniques in the context of speech analysis, specifically using Hindi vowels, in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with obturators.

Study setting and design: This research, designed as a quasi-experimental study, was undertaken at a tertiary care hospital.

Material and methods: The study included 20 patients needing obturators, assigned to two groups: one received prostheses fabricated with conventional impressions, and the other with digital techniques. Speech parameters, including fundamental frequency, formant frequencies (F1, F2, F3), intensity, jitter, shimmer, and maximum phonation duration (MPD), were analyzed using Praat software before and three months after rehabilitation. Hindi vowels aa /a:/, ii /i:/, and uu /u:/ were sustained at a controlled intensity. Swallowing efficiency was assessed via the water swallow test.

Statistical analysis used: The Wilcoxon Rank Sum test or exact test was used to compare the data, with a p-value < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: The most common maxillectomy defects were Brown class 2b. After three months, significant improvement in speech parameters and swallowing efficiency was seen in both groups of participants. However, no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were found between the conventional and digital impression groups.

Conclusions: This novel study compared conventional and digital impressions for speech analysis using Hindi vowels in maxillectomy patients after rehabilitation with an obturator. Voice recording and acoustic analysis using Hindi vowels provide valuable insights into speech rehabilitation outcomes in maxillectomy patients. Both conventional and digital impression techniques effectively fabricate obturators, improving speech characteristics and intelligibility. Both methods can be used for maxillectomy patients, allowing flexibility in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信