Clement Abbatecola, Henry Kennedy, Kenneth Knoblauch
{"title":"定向注意影响自上而下和自下而上多模态知觉整合的最优性。","authors":"Clement Abbatecola, Henry Kennedy, Kenneth Knoblauch","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-09542-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multimodal sensory integration is a ubiquitous neural process that can be modeled as optimal cue combination, incorporating both top-down, attention-like signals and bottom-up evidence that impact the precision of response variables. Accordingly, reducing attention or adding noise to one modality is expected to decrease proportionally its contribution while increasing that of the other modality. We tested this prediction using a gender-comparison task employing stimuli for which the face and voice were independently morphed between average male and female exemplars. Top-down influences were manipulated by having observers judge the stimuli with respect to either one or both modalities. Bottom-up influences were manipulated by introducing independent and varying amounts of visual and auditory noise. The contributions of each modality were estimated by maximum likelihood within a signal detection model of the decision process. As expected, if the attended modality was degraded by noise, the contribution of the unattended modality increased in compensation. Contrary to prediction, however, noise in the unattended modality had no impact on the attended modality. The results signal a departure from an optimal cue combination rule and are relevant to theories of predictive processes and observations in bimodal learning in modality-specific agnosia (prosopagnosia, phonagnosia).</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"25742"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Directed attention influences optimality of top-down and bottom-up multi-modal perceptual integration.\",\"authors\":\"Clement Abbatecola, Henry Kennedy, Kenneth Knoblauch\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-09542-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multimodal sensory integration is a ubiquitous neural process that can be modeled as optimal cue combination, incorporating both top-down, attention-like signals and bottom-up evidence that impact the precision of response variables. Accordingly, reducing attention or adding noise to one modality is expected to decrease proportionally its contribution while increasing that of the other modality. We tested this prediction using a gender-comparison task employing stimuli for which the face and voice were independently morphed between average male and female exemplars. Top-down influences were manipulated by having observers judge the stimuli with respect to either one or both modalities. Bottom-up influences were manipulated by introducing independent and varying amounts of visual and auditory noise. The contributions of each modality were estimated by maximum likelihood within a signal detection model of the decision process. As expected, if the attended modality was degraded by noise, the contribution of the unattended modality increased in compensation. Contrary to prediction, however, noise in the unattended modality had no impact on the attended modality. The results signal a departure from an optimal cue combination rule and are relevant to theories of predictive processes and observations in bimodal learning in modality-specific agnosia (prosopagnosia, phonagnosia).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"25742\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267639/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09542-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09542-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Directed attention influences optimality of top-down and bottom-up multi-modal perceptual integration.
Multimodal sensory integration is a ubiquitous neural process that can be modeled as optimal cue combination, incorporating both top-down, attention-like signals and bottom-up evidence that impact the precision of response variables. Accordingly, reducing attention or adding noise to one modality is expected to decrease proportionally its contribution while increasing that of the other modality. We tested this prediction using a gender-comparison task employing stimuli for which the face and voice were independently morphed between average male and female exemplars. Top-down influences were manipulated by having observers judge the stimuli with respect to either one or both modalities. Bottom-up influences were manipulated by introducing independent and varying amounts of visual and auditory noise. The contributions of each modality were estimated by maximum likelihood within a signal detection model of the decision process. As expected, if the attended modality was degraded by noise, the contribution of the unattended modality increased in compensation. Contrary to prediction, however, noise in the unattended modality had no impact on the attended modality. The results signal a departure from an optimal cue combination rule and are relevant to theories of predictive processes and observations in bimodal learning in modality-specific agnosia (prosopagnosia, phonagnosia).
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.