DSM-5训练模拟器临床应用PTSD量表的可接受性和可行性。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Jessica L Hamblen, Cybele Merrick, Brian P Marx, Michelle J Bovin
{"title":"DSM-5训练模拟器临床应用PTSD量表的可接受性和可行性。","authors":"Jessica L Hamblen, Cybele Merrick, Brian P Marx, Michelle J Bovin","doi":"10.1037/tra0001998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for <i>DSM-5</i> (CAPS-5) is regarded as the state-of-the-art method for diagnosing <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition</i>, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To address the high demand for training in the CAPS-5, we developed the CAPS-5 Training Simulator (CAPSim), an online program in which learners administer the CAPS-5 to lifelike virtual PTSD patients and receive feedback on their performance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We created three virtual standardized PTSD patients who respond verbally to learners' spoken or typed prompts. Complexity and availability of in-course feedback varied across patients. The program was then made available to interested learners, and data on program use and user performance were collected to determine acceptability and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the first 4 years of the program, 4,484 users accessed the training. Of those who started the course (<i>N</i> = 3,022), most (83.6%) completed it. Although CAPS-5 familiarity varied, more than half of the users (58.3%) reported being moderately familiar with the CAPS-5 at baseline. Administration and scoring accuracy varied by virtual patient and by CAPS-5 item, with overall accuracy ranging from near perfect to 77.1% incorrect. Whereas the initial symptom prompts were delivered verbatim 76.2% of the time, in-sequence and additional required prompts were administered with less accuracy (46.0% and 39.2%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAPSim is an innovative method for training CAPS-5 learners with various skill levels. The CAPSim can identify specific administrative and scoring challenges and provide personalized feedback in a manner that appears acceptable to learners. The CAPSim has promise to meet the high demand for CAPS-5 training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability and feasibility of the clinician-administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 training simulator.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica L Hamblen, Cybele Merrick, Brian P Marx, Michelle J Bovin\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for <i>DSM-5</i> (CAPS-5) is regarded as the state-of-the-art method for diagnosing <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition</i>, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To address the high demand for training in the CAPS-5, we developed the CAPS-5 Training Simulator (CAPSim), an online program in which learners administer the CAPS-5 to lifelike virtual PTSD patients and receive feedback on their performance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We created three virtual standardized PTSD patients who respond verbally to learners' spoken or typed prompts. Complexity and availability of in-course feedback varied across patients. The program was then made available to interested learners, and data on program use and user performance were collected to determine acceptability and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the first 4 years of the program, 4,484 users accessed the training. Of those who started the course (<i>N</i> = 3,022), most (83.6%) completed it. Although CAPS-5 familiarity varied, more than half of the users (58.3%) reported being moderately familiar with the CAPS-5 at baseline. Administration and scoring accuracy varied by virtual patient and by CAPS-5 item, with overall accuracy ranging from near perfect to 77.1% incorrect. Whereas the initial symptom prompts were delivered verbatim 76.2% of the time, in-sequence and additional required prompts were administered with less accuracy (46.0% and 39.2%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAPSim is an innovative method for training CAPS-5 learners with various skill levels. The CAPSim can identify specific administrative and scoring challenges and provide personalized feedback in a manner that appears acceptable to learners. The CAPSim has promise to meet the high demand for CAPS-5 training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001998\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001998","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:DSM-5临床创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS-5)被认为是诊断精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的最先进方法。为了满足对CAPS-5培训的高需求,我们开发了CAPS-5培训模拟器(CAPSim),这是一个在线课程,学习者在其中对逼真的虚拟PTSD患者进行CAPS-5培训并接收他们的表现反馈。方法:我们创建了三个虚拟的标准化PTSD患者,他们对学习者的口头或打字提示做出口头反应。病程反馈的复杂性和可用性因患者而异。然后将程序提供给感兴趣的学习者,并收集有关程序使用和用户表现的数据,以确定可接受性和可行性。结果:在项目的前4年里,有4484名用户参加了培训。在开始课程的人中(N = 3022),大多数(83.6%)完成了课程。尽管对CAPS-5的熟悉程度各不相同,但超过一半的用户(58.3%)报告在基线时对CAPS-5的熟悉程度中等。管理和评分准确性因虚拟患者和CAPS-5项目而异,总体准确性从接近完美到77.1%不正确。尽管初始症状提示的准确率为76.2%,但顺序提示和额外要求提示的准确率较低(分别为46.0%和39.2%)。结论:CAPSim是培养不同技能水平的CAPS-5学习者的创新方法。CAPSim可以识别特定的管理和评分挑战,并以学习者可以接受的方式提供个性化反馈。CAPSim有望满足对CAPS-5培训的高需求。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability and feasibility of the clinician-administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 training simulator.

Objective: The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) is regarded as the state-of-the-art method for diagnosing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To address the high demand for training in the CAPS-5, we developed the CAPS-5 Training Simulator (CAPSim), an online program in which learners administer the CAPS-5 to lifelike virtual PTSD patients and receive feedback on their performance.

Method: We created three virtual standardized PTSD patients who respond verbally to learners' spoken or typed prompts. Complexity and availability of in-course feedback varied across patients. The program was then made available to interested learners, and data on program use and user performance were collected to determine acceptability and feasibility.

Results: Over the first 4 years of the program, 4,484 users accessed the training. Of those who started the course (N = 3,022), most (83.6%) completed it. Although CAPS-5 familiarity varied, more than half of the users (58.3%) reported being moderately familiar with the CAPS-5 at baseline. Administration and scoring accuracy varied by virtual patient and by CAPS-5 item, with overall accuracy ranging from near perfect to 77.1% incorrect. Whereas the initial symptom prompts were delivered verbatim 76.2% of the time, in-sequence and additional required prompts were administered with less accuracy (46.0% and 39.2%, respectively).

Conclusions: The CAPSim is an innovative method for training CAPS-5 learners with various skill levels. The CAPSim can identify specific administrative and scoring challenges and provide personalized feedback in a manner that appears acceptable to learners. The CAPSim has promise to meet the high demand for CAPS-5 training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信