非营养性甜味剂对体重控制计划中体重减轻和维持、代谢改善和食欲调节的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jing Wen, Qianhui Wu, Sihao Li, Yang Liu, Deliang Wen
{"title":"非营养性甜味剂对体重控制计划中体重减轻和维持、代谢改善和食欲调节的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jing Wen, Qianhui Wu, Sihao Li, Yang Liu, Deliang Wen","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Achieving and maintaining weight loss remains a clinical challenge, prompting interest in the potential role of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) in weight management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of NNSs on weight loss, weight maintenance, metabolic outcomes, and appetite regulation within weight-management programs.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Effect sizes for body weight and metabolic parameters were expressed as mean differences (MDs), and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were used for hunger scores.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>NNSs showed comparable efficacy with that of control interventions in promoting weight reduction within weight-management programs. However, subgroup analyses revealed significantly greater weight loss with NNSs in the \"mixed consumption\" group (trials with unquantified baseline NNS exposure; MD = -0.89 kg, 95% CI: -1.61 to -0.17) and the \"aspartame\" group (trials using aspartame as the sole NNS; MD = -1.03 kg, 95% CI: -2.01 to -0.05). Regarding metabolic outcomes, NNSs had no significant benefits over controls in improving lipid profiles. For glucose metabolism, insulin levels decreased less in the NNS group compared with the control group (MD = 13.80 pmol/L, 95% CI: 2.67 to 24.93), indicating that NNSs may be less effective in improving insulin sensitivity during weight management. In terms of appetite regulation, NNSs had no significant impact on hunger during the weight-maintenance phase; however, during the weight-loss phase, NNS consumption led to a reduction in hunger compared with the control groups (SMD = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.30 to -0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NNSs may enhance weight loss in \"mixed consumption\" and \"aspartame\" subgroups but do not offer clear benefits for lipid or glucose metabolism improvement. They may help reduce appetite during the weight-loss phase, though further evidence is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners on Weight Loss and Maintenance, Metabolic Improvement, and Appetite Regulation in Weight Management Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Wen, Qianhui Wu, Sihao Li, Yang Liu, Deliang Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Achieving and maintaining weight loss remains a clinical challenge, prompting interest in the potential role of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) in weight management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of NNSs on weight loss, weight maintenance, metabolic outcomes, and appetite regulation within weight-management programs.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Effect sizes for body weight and metabolic parameters were expressed as mean differences (MDs), and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were used for hunger scores.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>NNSs showed comparable efficacy with that of control interventions in promoting weight reduction within weight-management programs. However, subgroup analyses revealed significantly greater weight loss with NNSs in the \\\"mixed consumption\\\" group (trials with unquantified baseline NNS exposure; MD = -0.89 kg, 95% CI: -1.61 to -0.17) and the \\\"aspartame\\\" group (trials using aspartame as the sole NNS; MD = -1.03 kg, 95% CI: -2.01 to -0.05). Regarding metabolic outcomes, NNSs had no significant benefits over controls in improving lipid profiles. For glucose metabolism, insulin levels decreased less in the NNS group compared with the control group (MD = 13.80 pmol/L, 95% CI: 2.67 to 24.93), indicating that NNSs may be less effective in improving insulin sensitivity during weight management. In terms of appetite regulation, NNSs had no significant impact on hunger during the weight-maintenance phase; however, during the weight-loss phase, NNS consumption led to a reduction in hunger compared with the control groups (SMD = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.30 to -0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NNSs may enhance weight loss in \\\"mixed consumption\\\" and \\\"aspartame\\\" subgroups but do not offer clear benefits for lipid or glucose metabolism improvement. They may help reduce appetite during the weight-loss phase, though further evidence is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf094\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:实现和保持体重减轻仍然是一个临床挑战,促使人们对非营养性甜味剂(NNSs)在体重管理中的潜在作用产生兴趣。目的:我们对随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估NNSs在体重管理计划中对体重减轻、体重维持、代谢结果和食欲调节的影响。数据来源:我们检索了截至2023年12月的MEDLINE、Web of Science、Ovid、Embase和Cochrane数据库。数据提取:体重和代谢参数的效应量用平均差异(md)表示,饥饿评分用标准化平均差异(SMDs)表示。数据分析:在体重管理计划中,NNSs在促进体重减轻方面显示出与对照干预相当的功效。然而,亚组分析显示,在“混合消费”组中,NNS的体重减轻明显更大(未量化基线NNS暴露的试验;MD = -0.89 kg, 95% CI: -1.61至-0.17)和“阿斯巴甜”组(使用阿斯巴甜作为唯一神经刺激源的试验;MD = -1.03 kg, 95% CI: -2.01 ~ -0.05)。关于代谢结果,NNSs在改善脂质谱方面没有明显的益处。对于葡萄糖代谢,与对照组相比,NNS组的胰岛素水平下降较少(MD = 13.80 pmol/L, 95% CI: 2.67至24.93),表明NNS在改善体重管理期间的胰岛素敏感性方面可能效果较差。在食欲调节方面,NNSs对体重维持期的饥饿感无显著影响;然而,在减肥阶段,与对照组相比,NNS消耗导致饥饿感减少(SMD = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.30至-0.01)。结论:NNSs可能会促进“混合摄入”和“阿斯巴甜”亚组的体重减轻,但对改善脂质或葡萄糖代谢没有明显的益处。它们可能有助于在减肥阶段降低食欲,尽管还需要进一步的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners on Weight Loss and Maintenance, Metabolic Improvement, and Appetite Regulation in Weight Management Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Context: Achieving and maintaining weight loss remains a clinical challenge, prompting interest in the potential role of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) in weight management.

Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of NNSs on weight loss, weight maintenance, metabolic outcomes, and appetite regulation within weight-management programs.

Data sources: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to December 2023.

Data extraction: Effect sizes for body weight and metabolic parameters were expressed as mean differences (MDs), and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were used for hunger scores.

Data analysis: NNSs showed comparable efficacy with that of control interventions in promoting weight reduction within weight-management programs. However, subgroup analyses revealed significantly greater weight loss with NNSs in the "mixed consumption" group (trials with unquantified baseline NNS exposure; MD = -0.89 kg, 95% CI: -1.61 to -0.17) and the "aspartame" group (trials using aspartame as the sole NNS; MD = -1.03 kg, 95% CI: -2.01 to -0.05). Regarding metabolic outcomes, NNSs had no significant benefits over controls in improving lipid profiles. For glucose metabolism, insulin levels decreased less in the NNS group compared with the control group (MD = 13.80 pmol/L, 95% CI: 2.67 to 24.93), indicating that NNSs may be less effective in improving insulin sensitivity during weight management. In terms of appetite regulation, NNSs had no significant impact on hunger during the weight-maintenance phase; however, during the weight-loss phase, NNS consumption led to a reduction in hunger compared with the control groups (SMD = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.30 to -0.01).

Conclusions: NNSs may enhance weight loss in "mixed consumption" and "aspartame" subgroups but do not offer clear benefits for lipid or glucose metabolism improvement. They may help reduce appetite during the weight-loss phase, though further evidence is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信