火器相关穿透性颅脑损伤手术干预的医院间差异及其与住院病人死亡率的关系

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vikas N Vattipally, Kathleen R Ran, Saket Myneni, Jiaqi Liu, Jacob Jo, Debraj Mukherjee, Jose I Suarez, Elliott R Haut, Joseph V Sakran, Judy Huang, Chetan Bettegowda, James P Byrne, Tej D Azad
{"title":"火器相关穿透性颅脑损伤手术干预的医院间差异及其与住院病人死亡率的关系","authors":"Vikas N Vattipally, Kathleen R Ran, Saket Myneni, Jiaqi Liu, Jacob Jo, Debraj Mukherjee, Jose I Suarez, Elliott R Haut, Joseph V Sakran, Judy Huang, Chetan Bettegowda, James P Byrne, Tej D Azad","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Firearm-related penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) carries a high mortality risk and grim prognosis. This study aimed to quantify interhospital variation in operative intervention for this patient population and assess whether cranial surgery tendency is associated with inpatient mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) data set to identify adult patients presenting with firearm-related pTBI. Risk-adjusted hierarchical regression evaluated associations with cranial surgery. Hospitals were stratified into quartiles based on surgical tendency (lowest, quartile 1; highest, quartile 4 [Q4]). Propensity score matching was performed across quartiles, and a multivariable regression model was constructed to investigate associations between hospital quartile and inpatient mortality. Effect modification by pupillary reactivity was tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cranial surgery rates for 4895 patients (median age, 31 years) varied widely across 309 hospitals (0%-71%; median, 21%; median odds ratio, 1.33). After matching, treatment at Q4 hospitals was associated with significantly reduced odds of mortality compared with treatment at quartile 1 hospitals (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.78). Patients presenting with one (interaction P = .03) or both (interaction P = .03) unreactive pupils experienced amplified survival benefits from treatment at Q4 hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial interhospital variation exists in operative intervention for firearm-related pTBI. Hospitals with higher surgical tendency were associated with improved survival, and this effect was amplified for patients presenting with unreactive pupils. These findings suggest a need to standardize operative decision-making for patients with firearm-related pTBI, aligning with ongoing efforts by organizations such as the Brain Trauma Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interhospital Variation in Operative Intervention for Firearm-Related Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury and Associations With Inpatient Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Vikas N Vattipally, Kathleen R Ran, Saket Myneni, Jiaqi Liu, Jacob Jo, Debraj Mukherjee, Jose I Suarez, Elliott R Haut, Joseph V Sakran, Judy Huang, Chetan Bettegowda, James P Byrne, Tej D Azad\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000003623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Firearm-related penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) carries a high mortality risk and grim prognosis. This study aimed to quantify interhospital variation in operative intervention for this patient population and assess whether cranial surgery tendency is associated with inpatient mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) data set to identify adult patients presenting with firearm-related pTBI. Risk-adjusted hierarchical regression evaluated associations with cranial surgery. Hospitals were stratified into quartiles based on surgical tendency (lowest, quartile 1; highest, quartile 4 [Q4]). Propensity score matching was performed across quartiles, and a multivariable regression model was constructed to investigate associations between hospital quartile and inpatient mortality. Effect modification by pupillary reactivity was tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cranial surgery rates for 4895 patients (median age, 31 years) varied widely across 309 hospitals (0%-71%; median, 21%; median odds ratio, 1.33). After matching, treatment at Q4 hospitals was associated with significantly reduced odds of mortality compared with treatment at quartile 1 hospitals (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.78). Patients presenting with one (interaction P = .03) or both (interaction P = .03) unreactive pupils experienced amplified survival benefits from treatment at Q4 hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial interhospital variation exists in operative intervention for firearm-related pTBI. Hospitals with higher surgical tendency were associated with improved survival, and this effect was amplified for patients presenting with unreactive pupils. These findings suggest a need to standardize operative decision-making for patients with firearm-related pTBI, aligning with ongoing efforts by organizations such as the Brain Trauma Foundation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003623\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:火器性穿透性脑损伤(pTBI)死亡率高,预后差。本研究旨在量化该患者群体手术干预的医院间差异,并评估颅外科倾向是否与住院患者死亡率相关。方法:我们使用美国外科医师学会创伤质量改善计划(TQIP)数据集进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以确定出现枪支相关pTBI的成年患者。风险调整的层次回归评估与颅外科手术的关系。根据手术倾向将医院分为四分位数(最低,四分位数1;最高,四分位数4 [Q4])。在四分位数之间进行倾向评分匹配,并构建多变量回归模型来研究医院四分位数与住院患者死亡率之间的关系。用瞳孔反应性对效果进行了改性试验。结果:309家医院4895例患者(中位年龄31岁)的颅骨手术率差异很大(0%-71%;值,21%;中位优势比为1.33)。匹配后,与四分位数1医院的治疗相比,在四分位数4医院的治疗与显著降低的死亡率相关(优势比,0.61;95% ci, 0.47-0.78)。有一个(相互作用P = .03)或两个(相互作用P = .03)无反应瞳孔的患者在Q4医院的治疗中获得了更大的生存益处。结论:医院间对火器相关性pTBI的手术干预存在较大差异。手术倾向较高的医院与生存率提高有关,这种影响在瞳孔无反应的患者中被放大。这些发现表明,有必要对与枪支有关的pTBI患者的手术决策进行标准化,这与脑外伤基金会等组织正在进行的努力保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interhospital Variation in Operative Intervention for Firearm-Related Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury and Associations With Inpatient Mortality.

Background and objectives: Firearm-related penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) carries a high mortality risk and grim prognosis. This study aimed to quantify interhospital variation in operative intervention for this patient population and assess whether cranial surgery tendency is associated with inpatient mortality.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) data set to identify adult patients presenting with firearm-related pTBI. Risk-adjusted hierarchical regression evaluated associations with cranial surgery. Hospitals were stratified into quartiles based on surgical tendency (lowest, quartile 1; highest, quartile 4 [Q4]). Propensity score matching was performed across quartiles, and a multivariable regression model was constructed to investigate associations between hospital quartile and inpatient mortality. Effect modification by pupillary reactivity was tested.

Results: Cranial surgery rates for 4895 patients (median age, 31 years) varied widely across 309 hospitals (0%-71%; median, 21%; median odds ratio, 1.33). After matching, treatment at Q4 hospitals was associated with significantly reduced odds of mortality compared with treatment at quartile 1 hospitals (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.78). Patients presenting with one (interaction P = .03) or both (interaction P = .03) unreactive pupils experienced amplified survival benefits from treatment at Q4 hospitals.

Conclusion: Substantial interhospital variation exists in operative intervention for firearm-related pTBI. Hospitals with higher surgical tendency were associated with improved survival, and this effect was amplified for patients presenting with unreactive pupils. These findings suggest a need to standardize operative decision-making for patients with firearm-related pTBI, aligning with ongoing efforts by organizations such as the Brain Trauma Foundation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信