自愿信息和价格共享数据库-对八个英联邦成员国定价和采购情况的范围审查。

IF 2.5 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2523937
Bridget Kebirungi, Phyllis Ocran, Nduta Kamere, Lynette Keneilwe Mabote, Ngozi Osi, Meghna Joshi-von Heyden, Emily Gilmour, Janneth Mghamba, Layne Robinson, Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar, Helena Rosado, Victoria Rutter
{"title":"自愿信息和价格共享数据库-对八个英联邦成员国定价和采购情况的范围审查。","authors":"Bridget Kebirungi, Phyllis Ocran, Nduta Kamere, Lynette Keneilwe Mabote, Ngozi Osi, Meghna Joshi-von Heyden, Emily Gilmour, Janneth Mghamba, Layne Robinson, Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar, Helena Rosado, Victoria Rutter","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2523937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Commonwealth Health Ministers' meetings (2021-2023) identified medicines shortages, pricing, and price transparency as critical issues. This led to the establishment of the Voluntary Information and Price Sharing Database (VIPSD) in 2021, aimed at enhancing procurement transparency, reducing costs, and sharing information on health products amongst member states. However, adoption has been limited due to competing initiatives like pooled procurement systems introduced during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review focused on eight Commonwealth countries: Bangladesh, Dominica, Kenya, Malaysia, Malta, Solomon Islands, South Africa, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Nations were selected to represent diverse health systems, population sizes, and procurement practices. External researchers conducted literature reviews and standardised data collection to ensure consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review revealed varied pricing policies and procurement frameworks. Nations like Malta, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and South Africa had pharmaceutical policies ensuring affordability, while others lacked comprehensive pricing policies. Seven countries implemented pooled procurement programmes, enhancing value and reducing costs; three nations operated national health insurance schemes affecting medicine pricing. Five countries used pharmaceutical management information systems to streamline procurement. Despite these efforts, disparities persist due to fragmented frameworks, stock-outs, budget constraints, and delayed procurement processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VIPSD was identified as a potentially transformative tool to enhance transparency, promote fair pricing, improve collaboration, and ensure equitable access to innovative health products. To maximise its impact, the database requires clear scope definition, comprehensive data collection, funding, and robust maintenance. Expanding its adoption could help mitigate price disparities and strengthen medicine accessibility across Commonwealth member states.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2523937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voluntary information and price sharing database - a scoping review of the pricing and procurement landscape across eight Commonwealth Member States.\",\"authors\":\"Bridget Kebirungi, Phyllis Ocran, Nduta Kamere, Lynette Keneilwe Mabote, Ngozi Osi, Meghna Joshi-von Heyden, Emily Gilmour, Janneth Mghamba, Layne Robinson, Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar, Helena Rosado, Victoria Rutter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20523211.2025.2523937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Commonwealth Health Ministers' meetings (2021-2023) identified medicines shortages, pricing, and price transparency as critical issues. This led to the establishment of the Voluntary Information and Price Sharing Database (VIPSD) in 2021, aimed at enhancing procurement transparency, reducing costs, and sharing information on health products amongst member states. However, adoption has been limited due to competing initiatives like pooled procurement systems introduced during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review focused on eight Commonwealth countries: Bangladesh, Dominica, Kenya, Malaysia, Malta, Solomon Islands, South Africa, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Nations were selected to represent diverse health systems, population sizes, and procurement practices. External researchers conducted literature reviews and standardised data collection to ensure consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review revealed varied pricing policies and procurement frameworks. Nations like Malta, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and South Africa had pharmaceutical policies ensuring affordability, while others lacked comprehensive pricing policies. Seven countries implemented pooled procurement programmes, enhancing value and reducing costs; three nations operated national health insurance schemes affecting medicine pricing. Five countries used pharmaceutical management information systems to streamline procurement. Despite these efforts, disparities persist due to fragmented frameworks, stock-outs, budget constraints, and delayed procurement processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VIPSD was identified as a potentially transformative tool to enhance transparency, promote fair pricing, improve collaboration, and ensure equitable access to innovative health products. To maximise its impact, the database requires clear scope definition, comprehensive data collection, funding, and robust maintenance. Expanding its adoption could help mitigate price disparities and strengthen medicine accessibility across Commonwealth member states.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2523937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265096/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2523937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2523937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:英联邦卫生部长会议(2021-2023年)将药品短缺、定价和价格透明度确定为关键问题。这导致在2021年建立了自愿信息和价格共享数据库(VIPSD),旨在提高采购透明度,降低成本,并在成员国之间共享卫生产品信息。然而,由于大流行期间引入的集中采购系统等相互竞争的举措,采用受到限制。方法:本综述以八个英联邦国家为研究对象:孟加拉国、多米尼加、肯尼亚、马来西亚、马耳他、所罗门群岛、南非、圣文森特和格林纳丁斯。选定的国家代表了不同的卫生系统、人口规模和采购做法。外部研究人员进行文献综述和标准化数据收集以确保一致性。结果:审查揭示了不同的定价政策和采购框架。马耳他、孟加拉国、马来西亚和南非等国制定了确保可负担性的药品政策,而其他国家则缺乏全面的定价政策。七个国家实施了集中采购方案,提高了价值并降低了成本;有三个国家实行影响药品定价的国家健康保险计划。五个国家使用药品管理信息系统来简化采购。尽管做出了这些努力,但由于框架分散、缺货、预算限制和采购过程延迟,差距仍然存在。结论:VIPSD被确定为提高透明度、促进公平定价、改善合作和确保公平获得创新卫生产品的潜在变革性工具。为了最大限度地发挥其影响,数据库需要明确的范围定义、全面的数据收集、资金和强大的维护。扩大其采用范围可以帮助减轻英联邦成员国之间的价格差异并加强药品可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Voluntary information and price sharing database - a scoping review of the pricing and procurement landscape across eight Commonwealth Member States.

Background: The Commonwealth Health Ministers' meetings (2021-2023) identified medicines shortages, pricing, and price transparency as critical issues. This led to the establishment of the Voluntary Information and Price Sharing Database (VIPSD) in 2021, aimed at enhancing procurement transparency, reducing costs, and sharing information on health products amongst member states. However, adoption has been limited due to competing initiatives like pooled procurement systems introduced during the pandemic.

Methods: This scoping review focused on eight Commonwealth countries: Bangladesh, Dominica, Kenya, Malaysia, Malta, Solomon Islands, South Africa, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Nations were selected to represent diverse health systems, population sizes, and procurement practices. External researchers conducted literature reviews and standardised data collection to ensure consistency.

Results: The review revealed varied pricing policies and procurement frameworks. Nations like Malta, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and South Africa had pharmaceutical policies ensuring affordability, while others lacked comprehensive pricing policies. Seven countries implemented pooled procurement programmes, enhancing value and reducing costs; three nations operated national health insurance schemes affecting medicine pricing. Five countries used pharmaceutical management information systems to streamline procurement. Despite these efforts, disparities persist due to fragmented frameworks, stock-outs, budget constraints, and delayed procurement processes.

Conclusion: The VIPSD was identified as a potentially transformative tool to enhance transparency, promote fair pricing, improve collaboration, and ensure equitable access to innovative health products. To maximise its impact, the database requires clear scope definition, comprehensive data collection, funding, and robust maintenance. Expanding its adoption could help mitigate price disparities and strengthen medicine accessibility across Commonwealth member states.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信