自杀生活经验如何激励患者筛选和帮助:在澳大利亚社区药房背景下的小插曲研究。

IF 2.5 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2526089
Joseph A Carpini, Liza Seubert, Rhonda Clifford, Deena Ashoorian
{"title":"自杀生活经验如何激励患者筛选和帮助:在澳大利亚社区药房背景下的小插曲研究。","authors":"Joseph A Carpini, Liza Seubert, Rhonda Clifford, Deena Ashoorian","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2526089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lived experience with suicide - none, vicarious, or personal - may help explain how pharmacists respond to a person at risk of suicide. Leveraging self-determination theory, we explore the motivational pathways of identified, introjected, and amotivation through which lived experience informed pharmacists' intentions to engage in suicide screening, as well as both recommended and unrecommended mental health support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online cross-sectional vignette study was distributed to registered pharmacists (<i>n</i> = 291), interns, and students (<i>n</i> = 281) in Australia. The vignette describes a patient in a community pharmacy expressing signs of a potential suicide-related issue or crisis. Following on, participants responded to validated measures assessing their motivation to help, intentions to suicide screen, and use both recommended and unrecommended support. Participant demographics, including their lived experience with suicide, was collected. Analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0.1 with the PROCESS macro (Model 4; Hayes, 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those with no lived experience of suicide were more likely to screen patients for suicide but also more likely to use unrecommended helping compared to those with vicarious and personal experience. Vicarious, relative to no lived experience, was positively associated with suicide screening and recommended helping through identified motivation. Personal lived experience, relative to vicarious, was positively associated with more amotivation that increased both suicide screening as well as unrecommended helping.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, our findings highlight the need to consider pharmacists' lived experience with suicide, as it shapes their motivations to intervene and carries important implications for patient care. Our findings suggest key implications for pharmacy practice, including the importance of self-awareness and reflection on lived experience, integrating pharmacists with vicarious experience into training, and strengthening support for suicide prevention training.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2526089"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How suicide lived experience motivates patient screening and helping: a vignette study in the Australian community pharmacy context.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A Carpini, Liza Seubert, Rhonda Clifford, Deena Ashoorian\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20523211.2025.2526089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lived experience with suicide - none, vicarious, or personal - may help explain how pharmacists respond to a person at risk of suicide. Leveraging self-determination theory, we explore the motivational pathways of identified, introjected, and amotivation through which lived experience informed pharmacists' intentions to engage in suicide screening, as well as both recommended and unrecommended mental health support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online cross-sectional vignette study was distributed to registered pharmacists (<i>n</i> = 291), interns, and students (<i>n</i> = 281) in Australia. The vignette describes a patient in a community pharmacy expressing signs of a potential suicide-related issue or crisis. Following on, participants responded to validated measures assessing their motivation to help, intentions to suicide screen, and use both recommended and unrecommended support. Participant demographics, including their lived experience with suicide, was collected. Analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0.1 with the PROCESS macro (Model 4; Hayes, 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those with no lived experience of suicide were more likely to screen patients for suicide but also more likely to use unrecommended helping compared to those with vicarious and personal experience. Vicarious, relative to no lived experience, was positively associated with suicide screening and recommended helping through identified motivation. Personal lived experience, relative to vicarious, was positively associated with more amotivation that increased both suicide screening as well as unrecommended helping.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, our findings highlight the need to consider pharmacists' lived experience with suicide, as it shapes their motivations to intervene and carries important implications for patient care. Our findings suggest key implications for pharmacy practice, including the importance of self-awareness and reflection on lived experience, integrating pharmacists with vicarious experience into training, and strengthening support for suicide prevention training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2526089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265093/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2526089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2526089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自杀的亲身经历——非自杀、间接自杀或个人自杀——可能有助于解释药剂师如何应对有自杀风险的人。利用自我决定理论,我们探索了识别、内省和动机的动机途径,通过这些途径,生活经验告知药剂师从事自杀筛查的意图,以及推荐和不推荐的心理健康支持。方法:对澳大利亚注册药剂师(n = 291)、实习生和学生(n = 281)进行匿名在线横断面研究。这个小插图描述了一个在社区药房的病人表达了一个潜在的自杀相关问题或危机的迹象。接下来,参与者对评估他们帮助的动机、自杀筛查的意图以及使用推荐和不推荐支持的有效措施做出了回应。收集了参与者的人口统计数据,包括他们自杀的生活经历。使用SPSS 28.0.1和PROCESS宏进行分析(模型4;海斯,2022)。结果:那些没有自杀经历的人更有可能筛选自杀患者,但与那些有替代和个人经历的人相比,他们也更有可能使用非推荐的帮助。相对于没有生活经验而言,替代性与自杀筛查呈正相关,并建议通过确定的动机提供帮助。个人生活经历,相对于替代,与更多的动机呈正相关,这些动机增加了自杀筛查和非推荐的帮助。结论:总的来说,我们的研究结果强调需要考虑药剂师的自杀生活经验,因为它塑造了他们干预的动机,并对患者护理具有重要意义。我们的研究结果为药学实践提供了重要启示,包括自我意识和对生活经验的反思的重要性,将具有替代经验的药剂师纳入培训,以及加强对自杀预防培训的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How suicide lived experience motivates patient screening and helping: a vignette study in the Australian community pharmacy context.

How suicide lived experience motivates patient screening and helping: a vignette study in the Australian community pharmacy context.

How suicide lived experience motivates patient screening and helping: a vignette study in the Australian community pharmacy context.

Background: Lived experience with suicide - none, vicarious, or personal - may help explain how pharmacists respond to a person at risk of suicide. Leveraging self-determination theory, we explore the motivational pathways of identified, introjected, and amotivation through which lived experience informed pharmacists' intentions to engage in suicide screening, as well as both recommended and unrecommended mental health support.

Methods: An anonymous online cross-sectional vignette study was distributed to registered pharmacists (n = 291), interns, and students (n = 281) in Australia. The vignette describes a patient in a community pharmacy expressing signs of a potential suicide-related issue or crisis. Following on, participants responded to validated measures assessing their motivation to help, intentions to suicide screen, and use both recommended and unrecommended support. Participant demographics, including their lived experience with suicide, was collected. Analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0.1 with the PROCESS macro (Model 4; Hayes, 2022).

Results: Those with no lived experience of suicide were more likely to screen patients for suicide but also more likely to use unrecommended helping compared to those with vicarious and personal experience. Vicarious, relative to no lived experience, was positively associated with suicide screening and recommended helping through identified motivation. Personal lived experience, relative to vicarious, was positively associated with more amotivation that increased both suicide screening as well as unrecommended helping.

Conclusion: Overall, our findings highlight the need to consider pharmacists' lived experience with suicide, as it shapes their motivations to intervene and carries important implications for patient care. Our findings suggest key implications for pharmacy practice, including the importance of self-awareness and reflection on lived experience, integrating pharmacists with vicarious experience into training, and strengthening support for suicide prevention training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信