Chandler Hinson, Matthew Sink, Dominic Henn, Douglas Sammer, Andrew Y Zhang, Jessica I Billig, Edward Chang, Andrei Odobescu
{"title":"预防继发性淋巴水肿:直接淋巴静脉吻合术疗效的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Chandler Hinson, Matthew Sink, Dominic Henn, Douglas Sammer, Andrew Y Zhang, Jessica I Billig, Edward Chang, Andrei Odobescu","doi":"10.1002/jso.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Secondary lymphedema is a debilitating condition following oncologic lymphadenectomy. Despite advancements in rehabilitation and microsurgical interventions, there is no cure for lymphedema. Performing a lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) at the time of a regional node dissection has been purported to reduce the risks of secondary lymphedema; however, there are conflicting studies and no clear consensus about the routine use of LVA for preventing lymphedema after lymphadenectomy. The present study aims to perform a comprehensive review and meta-analysis on immediate LVA for the prevention of secondary lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and literature search were performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Studies evaluating primary or immediate LVA in oncologic surgery were included. Studies with a control group were included in the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 39 studies, including 3697 patients (1,722 LVA; 1975 control), met inclusion criteria. Seventeen of the studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis across all studies revealed a secondary lymphedema incidence of 7.1% in the LVA cohort versus 35.0% in controls. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in lymphedema risk with immediate LVA (RR: 0.31). Subgroup analysis confirmed strong protective effects in breast cancer patients (RR: 0.28) and a significant but lesser benefit in dermatologic malignancies (RR: 0.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the current literature, immediate LVA at time of lymphadenectomy significantly reduces the risk of secondary lymphedema in patients undergoing oncologic treatment. Given these findings, patients undergoing multimodal oncologic treatment including radiation and surgical lymphadenectomy should be considered candidates for immediate LVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventing Secondary Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Immediate Lymphovenous Anastomosis.\",\"authors\":\"Chandler Hinson, Matthew Sink, Dominic Henn, Douglas Sammer, Andrew Y Zhang, Jessica I Billig, Edward Chang, Andrei Odobescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.70046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Secondary lymphedema is a debilitating condition following oncologic lymphadenectomy. Despite advancements in rehabilitation and microsurgical interventions, there is no cure for lymphedema. Performing a lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) at the time of a regional node dissection has been purported to reduce the risks of secondary lymphedema; however, there are conflicting studies and no clear consensus about the routine use of LVA for preventing lymphedema after lymphadenectomy. The present study aims to perform a comprehensive review and meta-analysis on immediate LVA for the prevention of secondary lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and literature search were performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Studies evaluating primary or immediate LVA in oncologic surgery were included. Studies with a control group were included in the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 39 studies, including 3697 patients (1,722 LVA; 1975 control), met inclusion criteria. Seventeen of the studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis across all studies revealed a secondary lymphedema incidence of 7.1% in the LVA cohort versus 35.0% in controls. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in lymphedema risk with immediate LVA (RR: 0.31). Subgroup analysis confirmed strong protective effects in breast cancer patients (RR: 0.28) and a significant but lesser benefit in dermatologic malignancies (RR: 0.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the current literature, immediate LVA at time of lymphadenectomy significantly reduces the risk of secondary lymphedema in patients undergoing oncologic treatment. Given these findings, patients undergoing multimodal oncologic treatment including radiation and surgical lymphadenectomy should be considered candidates for immediate LVA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70046\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:继发性淋巴水肿是肿瘤淋巴切除术后的一种衰弱性疾病。尽管在康复和显微外科干预方面取得了进展,淋巴水肿仍无法治愈。在局部淋巴结清扫时进行淋巴静脉吻合(LVA)被认为可以降低继发性淋巴水肿的风险;然而,关于常规使用LVA预防淋巴结切除术后淋巴水肿的研究存在矛盾,没有明确的共识。本研究旨在对即时LVA预防继发性淋巴水肿进行全面回顾和荟萃分析。方法:使用PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库进行系统综述和文献检索。评估肿瘤手术中原发性或即刻LVA的研究被纳入其中。meta分析包括对照组的研究。结果:总共39项研究,包括3697例患者(1722例LVA;1975对照),符合纳入标准。其中17项研究被纳入meta分析。所有研究的汇总分析显示,LVA组继发性淋巴水肿发生率为7.1%,对照组为35.0%。荟萃分析显示,即时LVA患者淋巴水肿风险显著降低(RR: 0.31)。亚组分析证实对乳腺癌患者有很强的保护作用(RR: 0.28),对皮肤恶性肿瘤有显著但较少的益处(RR: 0.35)。结论:根据目前的文献,淋巴结切除术时立即进行LVA可显著降低肿瘤治疗患者继发淋巴水肿的风险。鉴于这些发现,接受多模式肿瘤治疗(包括放疗和手术淋巴结切除术)的患者应考虑立即进行LVA。
Preventing Secondary Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Immediate Lymphovenous Anastomosis.
Background: Secondary lymphedema is a debilitating condition following oncologic lymphadenectomy. Despite advancements in rehabilitation and microsurgical interventions, there is no cure for lymphedema. Performing a lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) at the time of a regional node dissection has been purported to reduce the risks of secondary lymphedema; however, there are conflicting studies and no clear consensus about the routine use of LVA for preventing lymphedema after lymphadenectomy. The present study aims to perform a comprehensive review and meta-analysis on immediate LVA for the prevention of secondary lymphedema.
Methods: A systematic review and literature search were performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Studies evaluating primary or immediate LVA in oncologic surgery were included. Studies with a control group were included in the meta-analysis.
Results: Overall, 39 studies, including 3697 patients (1,722 LVA; 1975 control), met inclusion criteria. Seventeen of the studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis across all studies revealed a secondary lymphedema incidence of 7.1% in the LVA cohort versus 35.0% in controls. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in lymphedema risk with immediate LVA (RR: 0.31). Subgroup analysis confirmed strong protective effects in breast cancer patients (RR: 0.28) and a significant but lesser benefit in dermatologic malignancies (RR: 0.35).
Conclusion: Based on the current literature, immediate LVA at time of lymphadenectomy significantly reduces the risk of secondary lymphedema in patients undergoing oncologic treatment. Given these findings, patients undergoing multimodal oncologic treatment including radiation and surgical lymphadenectomy should be considered candidates for immediate LVA.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.