{"title":"高强度间歇训练对冠心病pci或CABG后患者心肺功能和生活质量的影响:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Guizhen Hong, Fei Liu","doi":"10.1186/s13019-025-03543-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as a potential cardiac rehabilitation strategy for coronary heart disease (CHD) post-surgery, but its efficacy compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of HIIT on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in CHD patients post-PCI or CABG in comparison with MICT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials from PMID, Cochrane, Embase, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases comparing HIIT with MICT in CHD patients. Data on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), left ventricular ejection function (LVEF), heart rates, and quality of life were extracted and analyzed using random-or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HIIT significantly improved VO<sub>2</sub>peak by 1.678 mL/kg/min (95%CI = 1.082-2.275), increased LVEF by 2.831% (95%CI = 1.124-4.538), enhanced peak HR by 6.717 beats/min (95%CI = 5.111-8.323) compared to MICT. Resting HR did not differ significantly between groups. Quality of life (SMD = 0.132, 95%CI = 0.051-0.213, P = 0.001) was significantly elevated by HIIT, particularly in the physical domain. Subgroup analyses showed consistent benefits of HIIT across exercise durations and times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIIT effectively enhances cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in CHD post-surgery. HIIT may be a time-efficient alternative to MICT in cardiac rehabilitation programs. However, publication bias and high heterogeneity warrant caution in interpreting these results, indicating a need for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in post-PCI or CABG patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Guizhen Hong, Fei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13019-025-03543-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as a potential cardiac rehabilitation strategy for coronary heart disease (CHD) post-surgery, but its efficacy compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of HIIT on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in CHD patients post-PCI or CABG in comparison with MICT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials from PMID, Cochrane, Embase, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases comparing HIIT with MICT in CHD patients. Data on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), left ventricular ejection function (LVEF), heart rates, and quality of life were extracted and analyzed using random-or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HIIT significantly improved VO<sub>2</sub>peak by 1.678 mL/kg/min (95%CI = 1.082-2.275), increased LVEF by 2.831% (95%CI = 1.124-4.538), enhanced peak HR by 6.717 beats/min (95%CI = 5.111-8.323) compared to MICT. Resting HR did not differ significantly between groups. Quality of life (SMD = 0.132, 95%CI = 0.051-0.213, P = 0.001) was significantly elevated by HIIT, particularly in the physical domain. Subgroup analyses showed consistent benefits of HIIT across exercise durations and times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIIT effectively enhances cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in CHD post-surgery. HIIT may be a time-efficient alternative to MICT in cardiac rehabilitation programs. However, publication bias and high heterogeneity warrant caution in interpreting these results, indicating a need for further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265359/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03543-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03543-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in post-PCI or CABG patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis.
Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as a potential cardiac rehabilitation strategy for coronary heart disease (CHD) post-surgery, but its efficacy compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) remains uncertain.
Aim: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of HIIT on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in CHD patients post-PCI or CABG in comparison with MICT.
Methods: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials from PMID, Cochrane, Embase, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases comparing HIIT with MICT in CHD patients. Data on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), left ventricular ejection function (LVEF), heart rates, and quality of life were extracted and analyzed using random-or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity.
Results: HIIT significantly improved VO2peak by 1.678 mL/kg/min (95%CI = 1.082-2.275), increased LVEF by 2.831% (95%CI = 1.124-4.538), enhanced peak HR by 6.717 beats/min (95%CI = 5.111-8.323) compared to MICT. Resting HR did not differ significantly between groups. Quality of life (SMD = 0.132, 95%CI = 0.051-0.213, P = 0.001) was significantly elevated by HIIT, particularly in the physical domain. Subgroup analyses showed consistent benefits of HIIT across exercise durations and times.
Conclusion: HIIT effectively enhances cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in CHD post-surgery. HIIT may be a time-efficient alternative to MICT in cardiac rehabilitation programs. However, publication bias and high heterogeneity warrant caution in interpreting these results, indicating a need for further research.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields.
Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials.
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.