内镜下全层切除胃固有肌层上皮下病变的内牵引:比较研究。

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2544-2572
Jun Li, Xiaojia Hou, Kan Chen, Kangsheng Peng, Chao Huang, Feng Liu
{"title":"内镜下全层切除胃固有肌层上皮下病变的内牵引:比较研究。","authors":"Jun Li, Xiaojia Hou, Kan Chen, Kangsheng Peng, Chao Huang, Feng Liu","doi":"10.1055/a-2544-2572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Effective tissue traction is crucial for gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) to ensure a clear visual field for the dissection site. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of internal traction using a novel clip-with-spring device in assisting gastric EFTR.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients with gastric subepithelial lesions from the muscularis propria were enrolled for internal traction-assisted EFTR (IT-EFTR) and 26 patients for non-assisted EFTR (NA-EFTR) were enrolled as controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average tumor size was 1.5 ± 0.4 cm. All EFTRs were completed successfully with an average total procedure time of 62.4 ± 43.0 minutes and perforation time of 37.2 ± 29.9 minutes. En bloc resection was achieved in 50 patients (96.2%). IT-EFTR significantly improved serosa exposure score (3.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7, <i>P</i> <0.001) and shortened total procedure time (33.0 ± 21.8 vs. 91.8 ± 38.6 min, <i>P</i> <0.001) and perforation time (19.0 ± 18.8 vs. 55.5 ± 27.8 min, <i>P</i> <0.001) compared with NA-EFTR. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the two groups. However, visual analogue score after the procedure was significantly lower (4.2 ± 1.0 vs. 4.7 ± 0.7, <i>P</i> =0.037) and postoperative hospital stay (3.7 ± 2.1 vs. 4.8 ± 1.3, <i>P</i> =0.038) was significantly shorter in the IT-ERTR group than in the NA-EFTR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Internal traction using the novel clip-with-spring device could significantly improve safety and efficacy of gastric EFTR in the distal stomach.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25442572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal traction in endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric subepithelial lesions arising from the muscularis propria: Comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Li, Xiaojia Hou, Kan Chen, Kangsheng Peng, Chao Huang, Feng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2544-2572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Effective tissue traction is crucial for gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) to ensure a clear visual field for the dissection site. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of internal traction using a novel clip-with-spring device in assisting gastric EFTR.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients with gastric subepithelial lesions from the muscularis propria were enrolled for internal traction-assisted EFTR (IT-EFTR) and 26 patients for non-assisted EFTR (NA-EFTR) were enrolled as controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average tumor size was 1.5 ± 0.4 cm. All EFTRs were completed successfully with an average total procedure time of 62.4 ± 43.0 minutes and perforation time of 37.2 ± 29.9 minutes. En bloc resection was achieved in 50 patients (96.2%). IT-EFTR significantly improved serosa exposure score (3.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7, <i>P</i> <0.001) and shortened total procedure time (33.0 ± 21.8 vs. 91.8 ± 38.6 min, <i>P</i> <0.001) and perforation time (19.0 ± 18.8 vs. 55.5 ± 27.8 min, <i>P</i> <0.001) compared with NA-EFTR. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the two groups. However, visual analogue score after the procedure was significantly lower (4.2 ± 1.0 vs. 4.7 ± 0.7, <i>P</i> =0.037) and postoperative hospital stay (3.7 ± 2.1 vs. 4.8 ± 1.3, <i>P</i> =0.038) was significantly shorter in the IT-ERTR group than in the NA-EFTR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Internal traction using the novel clip-with-spring device could significantly improve safety and efficacy of gastric EFTR in the distal stomach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"a25442572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265393/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2544-2572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2544-2572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与研究目的:有效的组织牵引是胃内镜全层切除(EFTR)的关键,以确保解剖部位有清晰的视野。我们的目的是评估使用一种新型的带弹簧的夹子辅助胃EFTR的内牵引的有效性。患者和方法:选取26例胃固有肌层上皮下病变患者进行内牵引辅助EFTR (IT-EFTR), 26例非辅助EFTR (NA-EFTR)患者作为对照组。结果:平均肿瘤大小为1.5±0.4 cm。所有eftr均成功完成,平均总手术时间为62.4±43.0分钟,穿孔时间为37.2±29.9分钟。整体切除50例(96.2%)。IT-EFTR组明显改善血清暴露评分(3.4±0.9比1.9±0.7,P P P P =0.037),术后住院时间(3.7±2.1比4.8±1.3,P =0.038)明显短于NA-EFTR组。结论:采用新型弹簧夹内牵引装置可显著提高胃远端EFTR的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internal traction in endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric subepithelial lesions arising from the muscularis propria: Comparative study.

Background and study aims: Effective tissue traction is crucial for gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) to ensure a clear visual field for the dissection site. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of internal traction using a novel clip-with-spring device in assisting gastric EFTR.

Patients and methods: Twenty-six patients with gastric subepithelial lesions from the muscularis propria were enrolled for internal traction-assisted EFTR (IT-EFTR) and 26 patients for non-assisted EFTR (NA-EFTR) were enrolled as controls.

Results: Average tumor size was 1.5 ± 0.4 cm. All EFTRs were completed successfully with an average total procedure time of 62.4 ± 43.0 minutes and perforation time of 37.2 ± 29.9 minutes. En bloc resection was achieved in 50 patients (96.2%). IT-EFTR significantly improved serosa exposure score (3.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7, P <0.001) and shortened total procedure time (33.0 ± 21.8 vs. 91.8 ± 38.6 min, P <0.001) and perforation time (19.0 ± 18.8 vs. 55.5 ± 27.8 min, P <0.001) compared with NA-EFTR. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the two groups. However, visual analogue score after the procedure was significantly lower (4.2 ± 1.0 vs. 4.7 ± 0.7, P =0.037) and postoperative hospital stay (3.7 ± 2.1 vs. 4.8 ± 1.3, P =0.038) was significantly shorter in the IT-ERTR group than in the NA-EFTR group.

Conclusions: Internal traction using the novel clip-with-spring device could significantly improve safety and efficacy of gastric EFTR in the distal stomach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信