Abraham Olvera-Barrios, Watjana Lilaonitkul, Tjebo F C Heeren, Assaf Rozenberg, Darren Thomas, Alasdair Warwick, Taha Soomro, Abdulrahman Alsaedi, Roy Schwartz, Usha Chakravarthy, Haralabos Eleftheriadis, Faruque Ghanchi, Ashish Patwardhan, Paul Taylor, Adnan Tufail, Catherine A Egan
{"title":"抗vegf治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿对进展为增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的影响:来自多中心研究的数据驱动见解","authors":"Abraham Olvera-Barrios, Watjana Lilaonitkul, Tjebo F C Heeren, Assaf Rozenberg, Darren Thomas, Alasdair Warwick, Taha Soomro, Abdulrahman Alsaedi, Roy Schwartz, Usha Chakravarthy, Haralabos Eleftheriadis, Faruque Ghanchi, Ashish Patwardhan, Paul Taylor, Adnan Tufail, Catherine A Egan","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report insights on proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) risk modification with repeated antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in routine care.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Multicentre study (27 UK-National Health Service centres) of patients with non-PDR (NPDR) and DMO. Primary outcome was PDR development. Repeated anti-VEGF injections were modelled as time-dependent covariates using Cox regression and weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) adjusting for baseline diabetic retinopathy (DR) grade, age, sex, ethnicity, type of diabetes and deprivation. PDR incidence rates (IRs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2858 DMO anti-VEGF-treated eyes. Anti-VEGF injections showed a protective effect on PDR risk during the most recent 4 weeks from exposure, which rapidly decreased. Mild-NPDR had a lower PDR risk compared with moderate-NPDR (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.51, p=0.015) and severe-NPDR (HR 4.63, 95% CI 2.55 to 8.41, p<0.001). Patients with type 1 diabetes showed an increased PDR risk when compared with patients with type 2 diabetes (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.21, p<0.001). And every 5-year increase in age showed a 9% reduction in PDR hazards (p=0.002). The PDR cumulative IR was 4.45 (95% CI 3.89 to 5.09) per 100 person-years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WCE method is a valuable modelling strategy for repeated exposures in ophthalmology. Injections are protective against PDR predominantly within the most recent 4 weeks. Based on observed data, we show that age and baseline DR severity are relevant predictors of poor outcomes in patients with DMO treated with anti-VEGF.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular oedema on progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy: data-driven insights from a multicentre study.\",\"authors\":\"Abraham Olvera-Barrios, Watjana Lilaonitkul, Tjebo F C Heeren, Assaf Rozenberg, Darren Thomas, Alasdair Warwick, Taha Soomro, Abdulrahman Alsaedi, Roy Schwartz, Usha Chakravarthy, Haralabos Eleftheriadis, Faruque Ghanchi, Ashish Patwardhan, Paul Taylor, Adnan Tufail, Catherine A Egan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report insights on proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) risk modification with repeated antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in routine care.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Multicentre study (27 UK-National Health Service centres) of patients with non-PDR (NPDR) and DMO. Primary outcome was PDR development. Repeated anti-VEGF injections were modelled as time-dependent covariates using Cox regression and weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) adjusting for baseline diabetic retinopathy (DR) grade, age, sex, ethnicity, type of diabetes and deprivation. PDR incidence rates (IRs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2858 DMO anti-VEGF-treated eyes. Anti-VEGF injections showed a protective effect on PDR risk during the most recent 4 weeks from exposure, which rapidly decreased. Mild-NPDR had a lower PDR risk compared with moderate-NPDR (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.51, p=0.015) and severe-NPDR (HR 4.63, 95% CI 2.55 to 8.41, p<0.001). Patients with type 1 diabetes showed an increased PDR risk when compared with patients with type 2 diabetes (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.21, p<0.001). And every 5-year increase in age showed a 9% reduction in PDR hazards (p=0.002). The PDR cumulative IR was 4.45 (95% CI 3.89 to 5.09) per 100 person-years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WCE method is a valuable modelling strategy for repeated exposures in ophthalmology. Injections are protective against PDR predominantly within the most recent 4 weeks. Based on observed data, we show that age and baseline DR severity are relevant predictors of poor outcomes in patients with DMO treated with anti-VEGF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273153/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:报告常规护理中反复注射抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DMO)可降低增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)风险的见解。方法和分析:对非pdr (NPDR)和DMO患者进行多中心研究(27个英国国家卫生服务中心)。主要结局是PDR的发展。使用Cox回归和加权累积暴露(WCE)对基线糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)等级、年龄、性别、种族、糖尿病类型和剥夺进行调整,将重复抗vegf注射建模为时间相关协变量。计算PDR发病率(IRs)。结果:我们纳入了2858只DMO抗vegf处理的眼睛。在暴露后的最近4周内,抗vegf注射显示出对PDR风险的保护作用,并迅速下降。与中度npdr (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.13至3.51,p=0.015)和重度npdr (HR 4.63, 95% CI 2.55至8.41,p)相比,轻度npdr的PDR风险较低。结论:WCE方法是眼科重复暴露的有价值的建模策略。注射主要在最近4周内对PDR具有保护作用。根据观察到的数据,我们发现年龄和基线DR严重程度是抗vegf治疗的DMO患者预后不良的相关预测因素。
Impact of anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular oedema on progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy: data-driven insights from a multicentre study.
Objective: To report insights on proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) risk modification with repeated antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in routine care.
Methods and analysis: Multicentre study (27 UK-National Health Service centres) of patients with non-PDR (NPDR) and DMO. Primary outcome was PDR development. Repeated anti-VEGF injections were modelled as time-dependent covariates using Cox regression and weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) adjusting for baseline diabetic retinopathy (DR) grade, age, sex, ethnicity, type of diabetes and deprivation. PDR incidence rates (IRs) were calculated.
Results: We included 2858 DMO anti-VEGF-treated eyes. Anti-VEGF injections showed a protective effect on PDR risk during the most recent 4 weeks from exposure, which rapidly decreased. Mild-NPDR had a lower PDR risk compared with moderate-NPDR (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.51, p=0.015) and severe-NPDR (HR 4.63, 95% CI 2.55 to 8.41, p<0.001). Patients with type 1 diabetes showed an increased PDR risk when compared with patients with type 2 diabetes (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.21, p<0.001). And every 5-year increase in age showed a 9% reduction in PDR hazards (p=0.002). The PDR cumulative IR was 4.45 (95% CI 3.89 to 5.09) per 100 person-years.
Conclusions: The WCE method is a valuable modelling strategy for repeated exposures in ophthalmology. Injections are protective against PDR predominantly within the most recent 4 weeks. Based on observed data, we show that age and baseline DR severity are relevant predictors of poor outcomes in patients with DMO treated with anti-VEGF.