小胎龄新生儿体比例分类标准:范围综述。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Aziz Berkay Karadavut, Ilke Smits, Jeroen van Dillen, Marije Hogeveen
{"title":"小胎龄新生儿体比例分类标准:范围综述。","authors":"Aziz Berkay Karadavut, Ilke Smits, Jeroen van Dillen, Marije Hogeveen","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07870-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To create an overview of the criteria used to classify small for gestational age (SGA) newborns according to their body-proportionality as either asymmetric SGA or symmetric SGA, and to create an overview of the clinical outcomes related to body-proportionality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they described SGA newborns regardless of gestational age and if their classification on body-proportionality was given for both aSGA and sSGA. Data were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 38,265 studies identified after deduplication, 45 were included. Body-proportionality was classified by the ponderal index (PI) in 55.6% of studies (n = 25), head circumference (HC) in 24.4% (n = 11), birth length in 11.1% (n = 5), birth length and HC in 4.4% (n = 2), birth length and PI in 2.2% (n = 1), and PI, brain-to-body ratio and HC/length ratio in 2.2% (n = 1). The most commonly reported outcomes were asphyxia, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoglycemia, mortality and respiratory distress syndrome. The results regarding the outcomes were inconsistent and contradictory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Large heterogeneity in the published classifications and clinical outcomes regarding body-proportionality in the SGA newborns exists. Consensus on terms, methods and cut-off values used for body-proportionality is needed to improve future comparison of study results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"763"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The criteria to classify body-proportionality of the small for gestational age newborn: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Aziz Berkay Karadavut, Ilke Smits, Jeroen van Dillen, Marije Hogeveen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07870-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To create an overview of the criteria used to classify small for gestational age (SGA) newborns according to their body-proportionality as either asymmetric SGA or symmetric SGA, and to create an overview of the clinical outcomes related to body-proportionality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they described SGA newborns regardless of gestational age and if their classification on body-proportionality was given for both aSGA and sSGA. Data were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 38,265 studies identified after deduplication, 45 were included. Body-proportionality was classified by the ponderal index (PI) in 55.6% of studies (n = 25), head circumference (HC) in 24.4% (n = 11), birth length in 11.1% (n = 5), birth length and HC in 4.4% (n = 2), birth length and PI in 2.2% (n = 1), and PI, brain-to-body ratio and HC/length ratio in 2.2% (n = 1). The most commonly reported outcomes were asphyxia, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoglycemia, mortality and respiratory distress syndrome. The results regarding the outcomes were inconsistent and contradictory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Large heterogeneity in the published classifications and clinical outcomes regarding body-proportionality in the SGA newborns exists. Consensus on terms, methods and cut-off values used for body-proportionality is needed to improve future comparison of study results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265123/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07870-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07870-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:概述根据身体比例将小胎龄(SGA)新生儿分类为不对称SGA或对称SGA的标准,并概述与身体比例相关的临床结果。方法:使用PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行范围综述。如果研究描述了SGA新生儿,而不考虑胎龄,如果他们的身体比例分类是针对aSGA和sSGA给出的,则纳入研究。数据由两名独立审稿人筛选和提取。结果:在重复数据删除后确定的38265项研究中,有45项被纳入。55.6%的研究(n = 25)按体重指数(PI)分类,24.4% (n = 11)按头围(HC)分类,11.1% (n = 5)按出生长度和HC分类,4.4% (n = 2)按出生长度和HC分类,2.2% (n = 1)按出生长度和PI分类,PI、脑体比和HC/长度比按2.2% (n = 1)分类。最常见的报道结果是窒息、高胆红素血症、低血糖、死亡和呼吸窘迫综合征。关于结果的结果是不一致和矛盾的。结论:已发表的SGA新生儿身体比例分类和临床结果存在较大的异质性。需要对身体比例性的术语、方法和临界值达成共识,以改善未来研究结果的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The criteria to classify body-proportionality of the small for gestational age newborn: a scoping review.

Purpose: To create an overview of the criteria used to classify small for gestational age (SGA) newborns according to their body-proportionality as either asymmetric SGA or symmetric SGA, and to create an overview of the clinical outcomes related to body-proportionality.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they described SGA newborns regardless of gestational age and if their classification on body-proportionality was given for both aSGA and sSGA. Data were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers.

Results: Of the 38,265 studies identified after deduplication, 45 were included. Body-proportionality was classified by the ponderal index (PI) in 55.6% of studies (n = 25), head circumference (HC) in 24.4% (n = 11), birth length in 11.1% (n = 5), birth length and HC in 4.4% (n = 2), birth length and PI in 2.2% (n = 1), and PI, brain-to-body ratio and HC/length ratio in 2.2% (n = 1). The most commonly reported outcomes were asphyxia, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoglycemia, mortality and respiratory distress syndrome. The results regarding the outcomes were inconsistent and contradictory.

Conclusion: Large heterogeneity in the published classifications and clinical outcomes regarding body-proportionality in the SGA newborns exists. Consensus on terms, methods and cut-off values used for body-proportionality is needed to improve future comparison of study results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信