金刚烷胺作为治疗选择神经性疼痛与退行性腰骶管狭窄的狗。

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Chiara Caterino, Giovanni Della Valle, Federica Aragosa, Stefano Cavalli, Francesco Lamagna, Gerardo Fatone
{"title":"金刚烷胺作为治疗选择神经性疼痛与退行性腰骶管狭窄的狗。","authors":"Chiara Caterino, Giovanni Della Valle, Federica Aragosa, Stefano Cavalli, Francesco Lamagna, Gerardo Fatone","doi":"10.1186/s12917-025-04911-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Degenerative lumbosacral stenosis is a multifactorial condition with no consensus on optimal therapeutic management. In mildly affected dogs, treatment often includes analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which may be insufficient for effective pain control. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of amantadine in managing chronic neuropathic pain associated with this pathology in dogs, using ground reaction forces (GRFs) analysis, including Peak Vertical Force (PVF), Vertical Impulse (VI), and stance time (ST), and to evaluate whether the co-administration of amantadine improves the efficacy of meloxicam in patients who have shown a refractory response to meloxicam alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Client-owned dogs (≥ 12 months old, ≥ 20 kg) with a confirmed diagnosis of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis were enrolled in a randomized trial. Subjects were assigned to two treatment groups: Group A received meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg PO SID loading dose, followed by 0.1 mg/kg SID for 6 days) plus amantadine (3 mg/kg PO SID for 21 days); Group B received amantadine alone (3 mg/kg PO BID for 21 days). Gait analysis was performed using a force platform at baseline (T0), after 7 days (T1), and after 21 days (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty dogs met the inclusion criteria and completed the study. At enrollment, the two groups (10 animals each) were homogeneous. After 21 days, both groups showed significant increases in PVF%BW (p < 0.0001) and VI%BW (p = 0.0064 in Group A; p = 0.0023 in Group B). For VI%BW, Group A demonstrated a significant improvement between T0 and T1 (p = 0.0120), and T0 and T2 (p = 0.0083), but not between T1 and T2 (p = 0.4040). Group B showed significant increases between T0 and T2 (p = 0.0012), and T1 and T2 (p = 0.0034), but not between T0 and T1 (p = 0.7788). Regarding PVF%BW, both groups exhibited significant differences across all time points, showing progressive improvement over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that amantadine, either alone or in combination with meloxicam, improves GRFs in dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis and, may be a valuable component of its multimodal therapy, though additional research is necessary to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amantadine as a therapeutic option for neuropathic pain in dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Caterino, Giovanni Della Valle, Federica Aragosa, Stefano Cavalli, Francesco Lamagna, Gerardo Fatone\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12917-025-04911-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Degenerative lumbosacral stenosis is a multifactorial condition with no consensus on optimal therapeutic management. In mildly affected dogs, treatment often includes analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which may be insufficient for effective pain control. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of amantadine in managing chronic neuropathic pain associated with this pathology in dogs, using ground reaction forces (GRFs) analysis, including Peak Vertical Force (PVF), Vertical Impulse (VI), and stance time (ST), and to evaluate whether the co-administration of amantadine improves the efficacy of meloxicam in patients who have shown a refractory response to meloxicam alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Client-owned dogs (≥ 12 months old, ≥ 20 kg) with a confirmed diagnosis of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis were enrolled in a randomized trial. Subjects were assigned to two treatment groups: Group A received meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg PO SID loading dose, followed by 0.1 mg/kg SID for 6 days) plus amantadine (3 mg/kg PO SID for 21 days); Group B received amantadine alone (3 mg/kg PO BID for 21 days). Gait analysis was performed using a force platform at baseline (T0), after 7 days (T1), and after 21 days (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty dogs met the inclusion criteria and completed the study. At enrollment, the two groups (10 animals each) were homogeneous. After 21 days, both groups showed significant increases in PVF%BW (p < 0.0001) and VI%BW (p = 0.0064 in Group A; p = 0.0023 in Group B). For VI%BW, Group A demonstrated a significant improvement between T0 and T1 (p = 0.0120), and T0 and T2 (p = 0.0083), but not between T1 and T2 (p = 0.4040). Group B showed significant increases between T0 and T2 (p = 0.0012), and T1 and T2 (p = 0.0034), but not between T0 and T1 (p = 0.7788). Regarding PVF%BW, both groups exhibited significant differences across all time points, showing progressive improvement over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that amantadine, either alone or in combination with meloxicam, improves GRFs in dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis and, may be a valuable component of its multimodal therapy, though additional research is necessary to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Veterinary Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265245/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Veterinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04911-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04911-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:退行性腰骶管狭窄是一种多因素疾病,对最佳治疗管理尚无共识。对于轻度受影响的狗,治疗通常包括止痛剂和非甾体抗炎药,这可能不足以有效控制疼痛。本研究旨在通过地面反作用力(GRFs)分析,包括峰值垂直力(PVF)、垂直脉冲(VI)和站立时间(ST),评估金刚烷胺在治疗犬慢性神经性疼痛方面的疗效,并评估在单用美洛昔康表现出难治性反应的患者中,金刚烷胺联用是否能提高美洛昔康的疗效。方法:客户拥有的确诊为退行性腰骶管狭窄的狗(≥12个月,≥20公斤)入组一项随机试验。将受试者分为两个治疗组:A组给予美洛昔康(0.2 mg/kg PO SID负荷剂量,随后0.1 mg/kg SID,持续6天)加金刚烷胺(3 mg/kg PO SID,持续21天);B组单独给予金刚烷胺(3 mg/kg PO BID,连续21 d)。在基线(T0)、7天后(T1)和21天后(T2)使用力平台进行步态分析。结果:20只狗符合纳入标准并完成研究。入组时,两组(每组10只)均为同类。21天后,两组PVF%BW均显著增加(p)。结论:结果表明,金刚烷胺单独或联合美洛昔康可改善退行性腰骶管狭窄犬的grf,可能是其多模式治疗的一个有价值的组成部分,尽管需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Amantadine as a therapeutic option for neuropathic pain in dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis.

Amantadine as a therapeutic option for neuropathic pain in dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis.

Background: Degenerative lumbosacral stenosis is a multifactorial condition with no consensus on optimal therapeutic management. In mildly affected dogs, treatment often includes analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which may be insufficient for effective pain control. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of amantadine in managing chronic neuropathic pain associated with this pathology in dogs, using ground reaction forces (GRFs) analysis, including Peak Vertical Force (PVF), Vertical Impulse (VI), and stance time (ST), and to evaluate whether the co-administration of amantadine improves the efficacy of meloxicam in patients who have shown a refractory response to meloxicam alone.

Methods: Client-owned dogs (≥ 12 months old, ≥ 20 kg) with a confirmed diagnosis of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis were enrolled in a randomized trial. Subjects were assigned to two treatment groups: Group A received meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg PO SID loading dose, followed by 0.1 mg/kg SID for 6 days) plus amantadine (3 mg/kg PO SID for 21 days); Group B received amantadine alone (3 mg/kg PO BID for 21 days). Gait analysis was performed using a force platform at baseline (T0), after 7 days (T1), and after 21 days (T2).

Results: Twenty dogs met the inclusion criteria and completed the study. At enrollment, the two groups (10 animals each) were homogeneous. After 21 days, both groups showed significant increases in PVF%BW (p < 0.0001) and VI%BW (p = 0.0064 in Group A; p = 0.0023 in Group B). For VI%BW, Group A demonstrated a significant improvement between T0 and T1 (p = 0.0120), and T0 and T2 (p = 0.0083), but not between T1 and T2 (p = 0.4040). Group B showed significant increases between T0 and T2 (p = 0.0012), and T1 and T2 (p = 0.0034), but not between T0 and T1 (p = 0.7788). Regarding PVF%BW, both groups exhibited significant differences across all time points, showing progressive improvement over time.

Conclusion: The results suggest that amantadine, either alone or in combination with meloxicam, improves GRFs in dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis and, may be a valuable component of its multimodal therapy, though additional research is necessary to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信