久坐和非久坐老年人减少久坐行为的促进因素和障碍:基于COM-B模型和TDF的描述性定性研究

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Siqing Chen, Kaijie Yang, Albert Ko, Edward Giovannucci, Matthew Stults-Kolehmainen, Lili Yang
{"title":"久坐和非久坐老年人减少久坐行为的促进因素和障碍:基于COM-B模型和TDF的描述性定性研究","authors":"Siqing Chen, Kaijie Yang, Albert Ko, Edward Giovannucci, Matthew Stults-Kolehmainen, Lili Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23613-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged sedentary behavior is a critical health risk for older adults. However, little is known about the distinct barriers and facilitators experienced by sedentary and non-sedentary older adults. Understanding these factors is essential for designing effective behavior change interventions.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aims to identify and categorize the barriers and facilitators to reducing sedentary behavior among sedentary and non-sedentary older adults using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), thereby informing future mobile health (mHealth) interventions designed to reduce sedentary time in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with older adults, conducted at two community hospitals in China between July 2024 and September 2024. The interviews focused on older adults' psychological and physical capabilities, social and physical opportunities, and reflective and autonomous motivations related to sedentary behavior. According to the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines, participants were classified as sedentary (> 8 h/day sitting time) or non-sedentary (≤ 8 h/day) based on a participant characteristics questionnaire with verbal confirmation during the interview. The data were analyzed thematically, and the identified themes were mapped onto the COM-B model and TDF. Study procedures followed the COREQ checklist for qualitative research reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 29 older adults, comprising 19 sedentary (65.5%) and 10 non-sedentary (34.5%). The following ten higher-order themes were identified: Lack of Knowledge (and Limited Knowledge); Lack of Methods (and Available Methods); Sedentary Triggers (and Interruptions); Lack of Management (and Self-management); Lack of Social Support (and Available Social Support); Lack of Environmental Support (and Available Environment Support); Perceptions and Conflicts (and Importance and Effort); Lack of Confidence (and Confidence); Limited Belief (and Understanding Health Benefits); and Limited Motivation (and Sufficient Motivation).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sedentary older adults face barriers such as low awareness of health risks, lack of regulation strategies, and insufficient social support, while non-sedentary older adults demonstrate higher confidence, better self-regulation, and engage in structured activities supported by cues such as mobile health reminders.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitators and barriers of reducing sedentary behavior in sedentary and non-sedentary older adults: a descriptive qualitative study based on the COM-B model and TDF.\",\"authors\":\"Siqing Chen, Kaijie Yang, Albert Ko, Edward Giovannucci, Matthew Stults-Kolehmainen, Lili Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-025-23613-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged sedentary behavior is a critical health risk for older adults. However, little is known about the distinct barriers and facilitators experienced by sedentary and non-sedentary older adults. Understanding these factors is essential for designing effective behavior change interventions.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aims to identify and categorize the barriers and facilitators to reducing sedentary behavior among sedentary and non-sedentary older adults using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), thereby informing future mobile health (mHealth) interventions designed to reduce sedentary time in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with older adults, conducted at two community hospitals in China between July 2024 and September 2024. The interviews focused on older adults' psychological and physical capabilities, social and physical opportunities, and reflective and autonomous motivations related to sedentary behavior. According to the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines, participants were classified as sedentary (> 8 h/day sitting time) or non-sedentary (≤ 8 h/day) based on a participant characteristics questionnaire with verbal confirmation during the interview. The data were analyzed thematically, and the identified themes were mapped onto the COM-B model and TDF. Study procedures followed the COREQ checklist for qualitative research reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 29 older adults, comprising 19 sedentary (65.5%) and 10 non-sedentary (34.5%). The following ten higher-order themes were identified: Lack of Knowledge (and Limited Knowledge); Lack of Methods (and Available Methods); Sedentary Triggers (and Interruptions); Lack of Management (and Self-management); Lack of Social Support (and Available Social Support); Lack of Environmental Support (and Available Environment Support); Perceptions and Conflicts (and Importance and Effort); Lack of Confidence (and Confidence); Limited Belief (and Understanding Health Benefits); and Limited Motivation (and Sufficient Motivation).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sedentary older adults face barriers such as low awareness of health risks, lack of regulation strategies, and insufficient social support, while non-sedentary older adults demonstrate higher confidence, better self-regulation, and engage in structured activities supported by cues such as mobile health reminders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"2472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265329/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23613-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23613-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:长时间的久坐行为对老年人来说是一个严重的健康风险。然而,对于久坐和不久坐的老年人所经历的明显障碍和促进因素,人们知之甚少。了解这些因素对于设计有效的行为改变干预措施至关重要。目的:本研究旨在利用能力、机会、动机-行为(COM-B)模型和理论领域框架(TDF)识别和分类久坐和非久坐老年人减少久坐行为的障碍和促进因素,从而为未来旨在减少这类人群久坐时间的移动健康(mHealth)干预提供信息。方法:于2024年7月至2024年9月在中国两家社区医院通过对老年人的半结构化访谈收集数据。访谈的重点是老年人的心理和身体能力,社会和身体机会,以及与久坐行为相关的反思和自主动机。根据加拿大24小时运动指南,根据参与者特征问卷,并在访谈中口头确认,将参与者分为久坐(每天坐8小时以上)和非久坐(≤8小时/天)。对数据进行主题分析,并将识别的主题映射到COM-B模型和TDF上。研究程序遵循COREQ清单进行定性研究报告。结果:该研究包括29名老年人,其中19人久坐(65.5%),10人不久坐(34.5%)。确定了以下10个高阶主题:缺乏知识(和有限的知识);缺乏方法(和可用的方法);久坐的诱因(和干扰);缺乏管理(和自我管理);缺乏社会支持(和可用的社会支持);缺乏环境支持(以及现有的环境支持);认知和冲突(以及重要性和努力);缺乏自信(和自信);有限的信念(和对健康益处的理解);有限动机(和充分动机)。结论:久坐老年人面临健康风险意识低、缺乏调节策略和社会支持不足等障碍,而不久坐老年人表现出更高的信心、更好的自我调节能力,并在移动健康提醒等提示的支持下参与有组织的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facilitators and barriers of reducing sedentary behavior in sedentary and non-sedentary older adults: a descriptive qualitative study based on the COM-B model and TDF.

Background: Prolonged sedentary behavior is a critical health risk for older adults. However, little is known about the distinct barriers and facilitators experienced by sedentary and non-sedentary older adults. Understanding these factors is essential for designing effective behavior change interventions.

Purpose: The study aims to identify and categorize the barriers and facilitators to reducing sedentary behavior among sedentary and non-sedentary older adults using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), thereby informing future mobile health (mHealth) interventions designed to reduce sedentary time in this population.

Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with older adults, conducted at two community hospitals in China between July 2024 and September 2024. The interviews focused on older adults' psychological and physical capabilities, social and physical opportunities, and reflective and autonomous motivations related to sedentary behavior. According to the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines, participants were classified as sedentary (> 8 h/day sitting time) or non-sedentary (≤ 8 h/day) based on a participant characteristics questionnaire with verbal confirmation during the interview. The data were analyzed thematically, and the identified themes were mapped onto the COM-B model and TDF. Study procedures followed the COREQ checklist for qualitative research reporting.

Results: The study included 29 older adults, comprising 19 sedentary (65.5%) and 10 non-sedentary (34.5%). The following ten higher-order themes were identified: Lack of Knowledge (and Limited Knowledge); Lack of Methods (and Available Methods); Sedentary Triggers (and Interruptions); Lack of Management (and Self-management); Lack of Social Support (and Available Social Support); Lack of Environmental Support (and Available Environment Support); Perceptions and Conflicts (and Importance and Effort); Lack of Confidence (and Confidence); Limited Belief (and Understanding Health Benefits); and Limited Motivation (and Sufficient Motivation).

Conclusion: Sedentary older adults face barriers such as low awareness of health risks, lack of regulation strategies, and insufficient social support, while non-sedentary older adults demonstrate higher confidence, better self-regulation, and engage in structured activities supported by cues such as mobile health reminders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信