局部麻醉剂对多药耐药菌的体外抑菌活性研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-06-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/GKXF8390
Jin Sol Lee, Jeongeun Moon, Joo Yong Lee, Hyeon Tae Kim, Sanghi Park, Jin-Wook Park, Young Duck Shin
{"title":"局部麻醉剂对多药耐药菌的体外抑菌活性研究。","authors":"Jin Sol Lee, Jeongeun Moon, Joo Yong Lee, Hyeon Tae Kim, Sanghi Park, Jin-Wook Park, Young Duck Shin","doi":"10.62347/GKXF8390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Local anesthetics are widely used in clinical settings for pain management. In addition to their analgesic effects, they may also exhibit antimicrobial properties. However, data on their activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of lidocaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine against MDR bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MRPA), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of each anesthetic were determined using the standardized broth microdilution method according to CLSI guidelines. Clinical isolates of MRPA, CRE, and MRAB were tested. Identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK II systems. The local anesthetics were diluted to clinically relevant concentrations and tested in duplicate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bupivacaine exhibited the strongest antimicrobial activity, with MICs of 1.6 mg/mL for MRAB and 3.2 mg/mL for CRE. Lidocaine showed limited activity, with an MIC of 16 mg/mL for MRPA. Levobupivacaine showed intermediate effects. In all cases, MBCs were higher than the corresponding MICs. These findings suggest differential antibacterial efficacy among the agents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Local anesthetics demonstrated measurable antibacterial effects against MDR pathogens in vitro. Bupivacaine showed the strongest activity but has a lower clinical dosage limit due to its cardiotoxicity. While lidocaine has weaker antibacterial potency, its widespread use and safety profile make it a practical option. These results suggest local anesthetics may play a complementary role in infection-prone procedures but require cautious interpretation for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 6","pages":"4774-4778"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibacterial activity of local anesthetics against multidrug-resistant bacteria in vitro.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Sol Lee, Jeongeun Moon, Joo Yong Lee, Hyeon Tae Kim, Sanghi Park, Jin-Wook Park, Young Duck Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/GKXF8390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Local anesthetics are widely used in clinical settings for pain management. In addition to their analgesic effects, they may also exhibit antimicrobial properties. However, data on their activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of lidocaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine against MDR bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MRPA), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of each anesthetic were determined using the standardized broth microdilution method according to CLSI guidelines. Clinical isolates of MRPA, CRE, and MRAB were tested. Identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK II systems. The local anesthetics were diluted to clinically relevant concentrations and tested in duplicate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bupivacaine exhibited the strongest antimicrobial activity, with MICs of 1.6 mg/mL for MRAB and 3.2 mg/mL for CRE. Lidocaine showed limited activity, with an MIC of 16 mg/mL for MRPA. Levobupivacaine showed intermediate effects. In all cases, MBCs were higher than the corresponding MICs. These findings suggest differential antibacterial efficacy among the agents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Local anesthetics demonstrated measurable antibacterial effects against MDR pathogens in vitro. Bupivacaine showed the strongest activity but has a lower clinical dosage limit due to its cardiotoxicity. While lidocaine has weaker antibacterial potency, its widespread use and safety profile make it a practical option. These results suggest local anesthetics may play a complementary role in infection-prone procedures but require cautious interpretation for clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"4774-4778\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261177/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/GKXF8390\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/GKXF8390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:局麻药被广泛应用于临床疼痛管理。除了它们的镇痛作用,它们也可能表现出抗菌特性。然而,关于它们抗多药耐药(MDR)病原体活性的数据有限。本研究旨在评价利多卡因、左布比卡因和布比卡因对耐多药细菌的体外抗菌活性,包括铜绿假单胞菌(MRPA)、耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌(CRE)和鲍曼不动杆菌(MRAB)。方法:采用标准肉汤微量稀释法,按CLSI指南测定各麻醉药的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MBC)。对临床分离的MRPA、CRE和MRAB进行检测。使用MALDI-TOF MS和VITEK II系统进行鉴定。将局麻药稀释至临床相关浓度,一式两份检测。结果:布比卡因抗菌活性最强,MRAB的mic为1.6 mg/mL, CRE的mic为3.2 mg/mL。利多卡因表现出有限的活性,对MRPA的MIC为16 mg/mL。左布比卡因表现为中间效应。在所有情况下,MBCs都高于相应的MICs。这些发现表明不同药物的抗菌效果不同。结论:局麻药对耐多药病原菌具有明显的体外抗菌作用。布比卡因表现出最强的活性,但由于其心脏毒性,临床剂量限制较低。虽然利多卡因的抗菌效力较弱,但它的广泛使用和安全性使其成为一个实用的选择。这些结果表明,局部麻醉剂可能在感染易发手术中发挥补充作用,但在临床应用时需要谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibacterial activity of local anesthetics against multidrug-resistant bacteria in vitro.

Objectives: Local anesthetics are widely used in clinical settings for pain management. In addition to their analgesic effects, they may also exhibit antimicrobial properties. However, data on their activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of lidocaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine against MDR bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MRPA), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB).

Methods: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of each anesthetic were determined using the standardized broth microdilution method according to CLSI guidelines. Clinical isolates of MRPA, CRE, and MRAB were tested. Identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK II systems. The local anesthetics were diluted to clinically relevant concentrations and tested in duplicate.

Results: Bupivacaine exhibited the strongest antimicrobial activity, with MICs of 1.6 mg/mL for MRAB and 3.2 mg/mL for CRE. Lidocaine showed limited activity, with an MIC of 16 mg/mL for MRPA. Levobupivacaine showed intermediate effects. In all cases, MBCs were higher than the corresponding MICs. These findings suggest differential antibacterial efficacy among the agents.

Conclusions: Local anesthetics demonstrated measurable antibacterial effects against MDR pathogens in vitro. Bupivacaine showed the strongest activity but has a lower clinical dosage limit due to its cardiotoxicity. While lidocaine has weaker antibacterial potency, its widespread use and safety profile make it a practical option. These results suggest local anesthetics may play a complementary role in infection-prone procedures but require cautious interpretation for clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信