股骨跟双支撑螺钉固定增强Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折的生物力学稳定性:一项比较生物力学研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-06-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/OUBC8362
Xu-Chao Shi, Zhen-Tao Chu, Yi-Wen Yuan, Xiao-Long Xia, Wei-Long Li, Chuan-Bao Wang, Jiao-Jiao Hu
{"title":"股骨跟双支撑螺钉固定增强Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折的生物力学稳定性:一项比较生物力学研究。","authors":"Xu-Chao Shi, Zhen-Tao Chu, Yi-Wen Yuan, Xiao-Long Xia, Wei-Long Li, Chuan-Bao Wang, Jiao-Jiao Hu","doi":"10.62347/OUBC8362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study proposed a novel fixation method - femoral calcar double-supported screw fixation (FCDSF) - and evaluated its biomechanical performance. The fixation's mechanical properties were assessed and compared with those of inverted triangular parallel cannulated screws (3CS) and biplane double-supported screw fixation (BDSF) for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures (FNFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four synthetic femur models were allocated into three reduction groups simulating positive buttress, anatomical reduction, and negative buttress conditions. Each group was further divided into three subgroups (n = 6), fixed with FCDSF, 3CS, or BDSF. Torsional tests measured torque at the fracture site under 2° and 4° rotation. Load-to-failure tests were then conducted by applying continuous pressure until failure occurred, and the ultimate loads were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under all reduction conditions, FCDSF demonstrated significantly greater torque at both rotation angles compared with 3CS (P < 0.05), while difference with BDSF was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). FCDSF showed superior load-bearing capacity over both BDSF and 3CS across all conditions (P < 0.05). In both the FCDSF and BDSF groups, positive buttress and anatomical reductions provided significantly better resistance to torsion and shear than negative buttress configurations (both P < 0.05), with no significant difference between the two (P > 0.05). In the 3CS group, only the positive buttress configuration showed a significant improvement over the negative buttress (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FCDSF provides enhanced anti-shear and anti-rotational stability compared with 3CS in managing Pauwels type III FNFs. Negative buttress reduction should be avoided due to its inferior biomechanical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 6","pages":"4445-4454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Femoral calcar double-supported screw fixation enhances biomechanical stability in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a comparative biomechanical study.\",\"authors\":\"Xu-Chao Shi, Zhen-Tao Chu, Yi-Wen Yuan, Xiao-Long Xia, Wei-Long Li, Chuan-Bao Wang, Jiao-Jiao Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/OUBC8362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study proposed a novel fixation method - femoral calcar double-supported screw fixation (FCDSF) - and evaluated its biomechanical performance. The fixation's mechanical properties were assessed and compared with those of inverted triangular parallel cannulated screws (3CS) and biplane double-supported screw fixation (BDSF) for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures (FNFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four synthetic femur models were allocated into three reduction groups simulating positive buttress, anatomical reduction, and negative buttress conditions. Each group was further divided into three subgroups (n = 6), fixed with FCDSF, 3CS, or BDSF. Torsional tests measured torque at the fracture site under 2° and 4° rotation. Load-to-failure tests were then conducted by applying continuous pressure until failure occurred, and the ultimate loads were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under all reduction conditions, FCDSF demonstrated significantly greater torque at both rotation angles compared with 3CS (P < 0.05), while difference with BDSF was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). FCDSF showed superior load-bearing capacity over both BDSF and 3CS across all conditions (P < 0.05). In both the FCDSF and BDSF groups, positive buttress and anatomical reductions provided significantly better resistance to torsion and shear than negative buttress configurations (both P < 0.05), with no significant difference between the two (P > 0.05). In the 3CS group, only the positive buttress configuration showed a significant improvement over the negative buttress (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FCDSF provides enhanced anti-shear and anti-rotational stability compared with 3CS in managing Pauwels type III FNFs. Negative buttress reduction should be avoided due to its inferior biomechanical performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"4445-4454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261154/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/OUBC8362\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/OUBC8362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究提出了一种新的固定方法-股骨跟双支撑螺钉固定(FCDSF),并评价其生物力学性能。评估该固定物的力学性能,并与倒三角平行空心螺钉(3CS)和双翼双支撑螺钉固定(BDSF)治疗Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折(FNFs)的力学性能进行比较。方法:将54例人工股骨模型分为模拟正支撑、解剖复位和负支撑3组。每组进一步分为3个亚组(n = 6),分别用FCDSF、3CS或BDSF固定。扭转测试测量了2°和4°旋转下断裂部位的扭矩。然后通过施加持续压力直到发生故障来进行负载到失效测试,并记录极限负载。结果:在所有复位条件下,FCDSF在两个旋转角度上的扭矩均明显大于3CS (P < 0.05),而与BDSF的差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在所有条件下,FCDSF的承载能力均优于BDSF和3CS (P < 0.05)。在FCDSF组和BDSF组中,正支撑和解剖复位的扭转和剪切抗力明显优于负支撑配置(P < 0.05),两者之间无显著差异(P < 0.05)。在3CS组中,只有正支撑配置比负支撑配置有显著改善(P < 0.05)。结论:与3CS相比,FCDSF在治疗Pauwels III型FNFs方面具有更强的抗剪切和抗旋转稳定性。由于其较差的生物力学性能,应避免负支撑复位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Femoral calcar double-supported screw fixation enhances biomechanical stability in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a comparative biomechanical study.

Objectives: This study proposed a novel fixation method - femoral calcar double-supported screw fixation (FCDSF) - and evaluated its biomechanical performance. The fixation's mechanical properties were assessed and compared with those of inverted triangular parallel cannulated screws (3CS) and biplane double-supported screw fixation (BDSF) for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures (FNFs).

Methods: Fifty-four synthetic femur models were allocated into three reduction groups simulating positive buttress, anatomical reduction, and negative buttress conditions. Each group was further divided into three subgroups (n = 6), fixed with FCDSF, 3CS, or BDSF. Torsional tests measured torque at the fracture site under 2° and 4° rotation. Load-to-failure tests were then conducted by applying continuous pressure until failure occurred, and the ultimate loads were recorded.

Results: Under all reduction conditions, FCDSF demonstrated significantly greater torque at both rotation angles compared with 3CS (P < 0.05), while difference with BDSF was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). FCDSF showed superior load-bearing capacity over both BDSF and 3CS across all conditions (P < 0.05). In both the FCDSF and BDSF groups, positive buttress and anatomical reductions provided significantly better resistance to torsion and shear than negative buttress configurations (both P < 0.05), with no significant difference between the two (P > 0.05). In the 3CS group, only the positive buttress configuration showed a significant improvement over the negative buttress (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: FCDSF provides enhanced anti-shear and anti-rotational stability compared with 3CS in managing Pauwels type III FNFs. Negative buttress reduction should be avoided due to its inferior biomechanical performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信