右美托咪定联合异丙酚改善老年胸腔镜肺癌切除术患者血流动力学稳定性和恢复。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-06-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/XCOK4904
Yafeng Wang, Yalan Li
{"title":"右美托咪定联合异丙酚改善老年胸腔镜肺癌切除术患者血流动力学稳定性和恢复。","authors":"Yafeng Wang, Yalan Li","doi":"10.62347/XCOK4904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol versus propofol alone on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study included 123 patients aged ≥ 65 years scheduled for thoracoscopic lung cancer resection. Patients were divided into two groups: the dexmedetomidine-propofol group (observation group, n = 61) and the propofol-only group (control group, n = 62). Hemodynamic parameters - heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) - were recorded at predefined time points. Postoperative recovery times, stress and inflammatory markers (tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-α], interleukin-6 [IL-6]), adverse events, sedation scores, and pain scores were assessed. Multivariable regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to identify independent treatment effects and explore heterogeneity across patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group demonstrated significantly more stable hemodynamic profiles, with lower HR, MAP, SBP, and DBP fluctuations across time points (all P < 0.05). Postoperative awakening and orientation recovery times were significantly shorter in the observation group (both P < 0.05). Levels of norepinephrine, epinephrine, TNF-α, and IL-6 were significantly lower postoperatively in the observation group (all P < 0.05). Incidences of respiratory depression and nausea/vomiting were also reduced (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed the independent benefit of the combined regimen. Subgroup analyses revealed greater efficacy in patients with ASA class II and those over 75 years of age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of dexmedetomidine and propofol enhances intraoperative hemodynamic stability, accelerates recovery, reduces perioperative stress and inflammation, and lowers the incidence of adverse events in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection. These results support its clinical value, particularly in high-risk subpopulations. Further studies are needed to refine dosing strategies and optimize safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 6","pages":"4409-4420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dexmedetomidine combined with propofol improves hemodynamic stability and recovery in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection.\",\"authors\":\"Yafeng Wang, Yalan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/XCOK4904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol versus propofol alone on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study included 123 patients aged ≥ 65 years scheduled for thoracoscopic lung cancer resection. Patients were divided into two groups: the dexmedetomidine-propofol group (observation group, n = 61) and the propofol-only group (control group, n = 62). Hemodynamic parameters - heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) - were recorded at predefined time points. Postoperative recovery times, stress and inflammatory markers (tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-α], interleukin-6 [IL-6]), adverse events, sedation scores, and pain scores were assessed. Multivariable regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to identify independent treatment effects and explore heterogeneity across patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group demonstrated significantly more stable hemodynamic profiles, with lower HR, MAP, SBP, and DBP fluctuations across time points (all P < 0.05). Postoperative awakening and orientation recovery times were significantly shorter in the observation group (both P < 0.05). Levels of norepinephrine, epinephrine, TNF-α, and IL-6 were significantly lower postoperatively in the observation group (all P < 0.05). Incidences of respiratory depression and nausea/vomiting were also reduced (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed the independent benefit of the combined regimen. Subgroup analyses revealed greater efficacy in patients with ASA class II and those over 75 years of age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of dexmedetomidine and propofol enhances intraoperative hemodynamic stability, accelerates recovery, reduces perioperative stress and inflammation, and lowers the incidence of adverse events in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection. These results support its clinical value, particularly in high-risk subpopulations. Further studies are needed to refine dosing strategies and optimize safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"4409-4420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261165/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/XCOK4904\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/XCOK4904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价右美托咪定联合异丙酚与单用异丙酚对老年胸腔镜肺癌切除术患者术中血流动力学稳定性及术后恢复的影响。方法:本回顾性比较研究纳入123例年龄≥65岁的胸腔镜肺癌切除术患者。患者分为右美托咪定-异丙酚组(观察组,n = 61)和仅异丙酚组(对照组,n = 62)。血流动力学参数——心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)——在预定的时间点记录。评估术后恢复时间、应激和炎症指标(肿瘤坏死因子-α [TNF-α]、白细胞介素-6 [IL-6])、不良事件、镇静评分和疼痛评分。进行多变量回归和亚组分析,以确定独立的治疗效果,并探索患者亚组之间的异质性。结果:观察组患者血流动力学特征明显更稳定,HR、MAP、收缩压、舒张压各时间点波动均较低(P < 0.05)。观察组患者术后苏醒时间和定向恢复时间均显著缩短(P < 0.05)。观察组患者术后去甲肾上腺素、肾上腺素、TNF-α、IL-6水平均显著低于对照组(均P < 0.05)。呼吸抑制和恶心/呕吐的发生率也降低(均P < 0.05)。多变量分析证实了联合方案的独立获益。亚组分析显示ASA II级患者和75岁以上患者的疗效更好。结论:右美托咪定联合异丙酚可提高老年胸腔镜肺癌切除术患者术中血流动力学稳定性,加速恢复,减少围手术期应激和炎症,降低不良事件发生率。这些结果支持其临床价值,特别是在高危亚人群中。需要进一步的研究来完善给药策略和优化安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dexmedetomidine combined with propofol improves hemodynamic stability and recovery in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol versus propofol alone on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection.

Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 123 patients aged ≥ 65 years scheduled for thoracoscopic lung cancer resection. Patients were divided into two groups: the dexmedetomidine-propofol group (observation group, n = 61) and the propofol-only group (control group, n = 62). Hemodynamic parameters - heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) - were recorded at predefined time points. Postoperative recovery times, stress and inflammatory markers (tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-α], interleukin-6 [IL-6]), adverse events, sedation scores, and pain scores were assessed. Multivariable regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to identify independent treatment effects and explore heterogeneity across patient subgroups.

Results: The observation group demonstrated significantly more stable hemodynamic profiles, with lower HR, MAP, SBP, and DBP fluctuations across time points (all P < 0.05). Postoperative awakening and orientation recovery times were significantly shorter in the observation group (both P < 0.05). Levels of norepinephrine, epinephrine, TNF-α, and IL-6 were significantly lower postoperatively in the observation group (all P < 0.05). Incidences of respiratory depression and nausea/vomiting were also reduced (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed the independent benefit of the combined regimen. Subgroup analyses revealed greater efficacy in patients with ASA class II and those over 75 years of age.

Conclusion: The combination of dexmedetomidine and propofol enhances intraoperative hemodynamic stability, accelerates recovery, reduces perioperative stress and inflammation, and lowers the incidence of adverse events in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection. These results support its clinical value, particularly in high-risk subpopulations. Further studies are needed to refine dosing strategies and optimize safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信