所有闪闪发光的都不是金子:观众对菲利克斯·冈萨雷斯-托雷斯的糖果溢出装置的理解

IF 1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rachel Trusty
{"title":"所有闪闪发光的都不是金子:观众对菲利克斯·冈萨雷斯-托雷斯的糖果溢出装置的理解","authors":"Rachel Trusty","doi":"10.1111/cura.12663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The push to “queer the museum” calls for an increase in the inclusion of LGBT+ artworks and artists as an intervention into the heterosexual museum and canon. While popular, the display of queer, abstract objects is complicated as many museum visitors do not perceive the LGBT+ themes. In this article, I present the data on audience interpretation of two candy spill installations, <i>Untitled (L.A.)</i> (1991) and <i>Untitled (Placebo-Landscape-for-Roni)</i> (1993), when they were featured in exhibitions at Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, AR. Participant observation of and interviews with visitors demonstrate that while they understood the piece as a disruption to the site, no LGBT+ content was perceived. I make specific recommendations to museums based on the findings that argue the installation display, label text and placement, and museum staff training impact the viewer's understanding. As museums continue to participate in the <i>queer turn,</i> more should be considered when tackling the ethical display of LGBT+ works.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10791,"journal":{"name":"Curator: The Museum Journal","volume":"68 3","pages":"484-494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All That Glitters is Not Gold: Viewer Understanding of Felix Gonzalez-Torres's Candy Spill Installations\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Trusty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cura.12663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The push to “queer the museum” calls for an increase in the inclusion of LGBT+ artworks and artists as an intervention into the heterosexual museum and canon. While popular, the display of queer, abstract objects is complicated as many museum visitors do not perceive the LGBT+ themes. In this article, I present the data on audience interpretation of two candy spill installations, <i>Untitled (L.A.)</i> (1991) and <i>Untitled (Placebo-Landscape-for-Roni)</i> (1993), when they were featured in exhibitions at Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, AR. Participant observation of and interviews with visitors demonstrate that while they understood the piece as a disruption to the site, no LGBT+ content was perceived. I make specific recommendations to museums based on the findings that argue the installation display, label text and placement, and museum staff training impact the viewer's understanding. As museums continue to participate in the <i>queer turn,</i> more should be considered when tackling the ethical display of LGBT+ works.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curator: The Museum Journal\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"484-494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curator: The Museum Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cura.12663\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curator: The Museum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cura.12663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“酷儿博物馆”的推动要求增加LGBT+艺术作品和艺术家的参与,作为对异性恋博物馆和经典的干预。虽然很受欢迎,但酷儿、抽象物品的展示是复杂的,因为许多博物馆的参观者并没有意识到LGBT+的主题。在这篇文章中,我展示了观众对两件糖果溢出装置的解读数据,《Untitled》(洛杉矶)(1991)和《Untitled》(安慰剂-景观-罗尼)(1993),当它们在本顿维尔的水晶桥美国艺术博物馆展出时。参与者的观察和对参观者的采访表明,虽然他们认为这件作品是对现场的破坏,但没有感知到LGBT+的内容。根据研究结果,我向博物馆提出了具体的建议,这些建议认为装置的展示、标签文本和位置以及博物馆工作人员的培训会影响观众的理解。随着博物馆继续参与酷儿转向,在处理LGBT+作品的道德展示时,应该考虑更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
All That Glitters is Not Gold: Viewer Understanding of Felix Gonzalez-Torres's Candy Spill Installations

The push to “queer the museum” calls for an increase in the inclusion of LGBT+ artworks and artists as an intervention into the heterosexual museum and canon. While popular, the display of queer, abstract objects is complicated as many museum visitors do not perceive the LGBT+ themes. In this article, I present the data on audience interpretation of two candy spill installations, Untitled (L.A.) (1991) and Untitled (Placebo-Landscape-for-Roni) (1993), when they were featured in exhibitions at Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, AR. Participant observation of and interviews with visitors demonstrate that while they understood the piece as a disruption to the site, no LGBT+ content was perceived. I make specific recommendations to museums based on the findings that argue the installation display, label text and placement, and museum staff training impact the viewer's understanding. As museums continue to participate in the queer turn, more should be considered when tackling the ethical display of LGBT+ works.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curator: The Museum Journal
Curator: The Museum Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信