功能性状和系统发育解释了植物园本地和非本地物种的物候差异

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Faizan Shafee, Rayees A. Malik, Maroof Hamid, Anzar Ahmad Khuroo, Isabell Hensen, Robert Rauschkolb, Christine Römermann, Christoph Rosche, Eduardo Fernández-Pascual, Birgit Nordt, Anja Lindstädter, Alexandra Kehl, Barbara Knickmann, Elena Platonova, Martin Freiberg, Tomáš Koubek, Vibekke Vange, Manzoor A. Shah
{"title":"功能性状和系统发育解释了植物园本地和非本地物种的物候差异","authors":"Faizan Shafee,&nbsp;Rayees A. Malik,&nbsp;Maroof Hamid,&nbsp;Anzar Ahmad Khuroo,&nbsp;Isabell Hensen,&nbsp;Robert Rauschkolb,&nbsp;Christine Römermann,&nbsp;Christoph Rosche,&nbsp;Eduardo Fernández-Pascual,&nbsp;Birgit Nordt,&nbsp;Anja Lindstädter,&nbsp;Alexandra Kehl,&nbsp;Barbara Knickmann,&nbsp;Elena Platonova,&nbsp;Martin Freiberg,&nbsp;Tomáš Koubek,&nbsp;Vibekke Vange,&nbsp;Manzoor A. Shah","doi":"10.1111/geb.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Phenological shifts are regarded to be the most pronounced indicators of global climate change. Worldwide, native species pools are being increasingly colonised by non-native species, thus shaping novel communities. Here, we investigate whether, and how, phenology varies between native and non-native species. We also examine whether functional traits and/or phylogeny can explain these phenological variations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Europe and Asia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Perennial herbs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We studied multiple phenophases and functional traits of 427 plant species across 13 botanical gardens using the PhenObs monitoring protocol. We used linear mixed models to test for phenology and functional trait differences between native and non-native species. Boosted regression trees were employed to identify the functional trait predictors of phenology variance between native and non-native species. To test the effect of phylogeny on these phenological variations, we estimated phylogenetic signal using Pagel's λ.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Native and non-native species exhibited distinct phenological patterns and functional traits. Native species started vegetative phenophases earlier than non-native species and senesced later. Similarly, reproductive phenophases varied, with native species flowering earlier and having longer flowering and fruiting durations. Native species also had higher specific leaf area, while non-native species had higher seed mass and larger leaf area. The variations in phenology were explained by garden location, leaf area, plant height, and leaf nitrogen. Most phenophases and functional traits showed low phylogenetic conservatism, suggesting a more important role of local environmental factors in driving these variations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that the phenological differences between native and non-native species, both in timing and magnitude, may change the community composition and structure under global change. Non-native species likely occupy a subset of native phenological niches, and this overlap may alter biotic interactions and ecosystem functioning. Future research needs to substantiate our findings under natural field conditions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Traits and Phylogeny Explain Plant Phenological Variations Among Native and Non-Native Species in Botanical Gardens\",\"authors\":\"Faizan Shafee,&nbsp;Rayees A. Malik,&nbsp;Maroof Hamid,&nbsp;Anzar Ahmad Khuroo,&nbsp;Isabell Hensen,&nbsp;Robert Rauschkolb,&nbsp;Christine Römermann,&nbsp;Christoph Rosche,&nbsp;Eduardo Fernández-Pascual,&nbsp;Birgit Nordt,&nbsp;Anja Lindstädter,&nbsp;Alexandra Kehl,&nbsp;Barbara Knickmann,&nbsp;Elena Platonova,&nbsp;Martin Freiberg,&nbsp;Tomáš Koubek,&nbsp;Vibekke Vange,&nbsp;Manzoor A. Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.70091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Phenological shifts are regarded to be the most pronounced indicators of global climate change. Worldwide, native species pools are being increasingly colonised by non-native species, thus shaping novel communities. Here, we investigate whether, and how, phenology varies between native and non-native species. We also examine whether functional traits and/or phylogeny can explain these phenological variations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Europe and Asia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>2022.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Perennial herbs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We studied multiple phenophases and functional traits of 427 plant species across 13 botanical gardens using the PhenObs monitoring protocol. We used linear mixed models to test for phenology and functional trait differences between native and non-native species. Boosted regression trees were employed to identify the functional trait predictors of phenology variance between native and non-native species. To test the effect of phylogeny on these phenological variations, we estimated phylogenetic signal using Pagel's λ.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Native and non-native species exhibited distinct phenological patterns and functional traits. Native species started vegetative phenophases earlier than non-native species and senesced later. Similarly, reproductive phenophases varied, with native species flowering earlier and having longer flowering and fruiting durations. Native species also had higher specific leaf area, while non-native species had higher seed mass and larger leaf area. The variations in phenology were explained by garden location, leaf area, plant height, and leaf nitrogen. Most phenophases and functional traits showed low phylogenetic conservatism, suggesting a more important role of local environmental factors in driving these variations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings suggest that the phenological differences between native and non-native species, both in timing and magnitude, may change the community composition and structure under global change. Non-native species likely occupy a subset of native phenological niches, and this overlap may alter biotic interactions and ecosystem functioning. Future research needs to substantiate our findings under natural field conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70091\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的物候变化被认为是全球气候变化最显著的指标。在世界范围内,本地物种池正越来越多地被非本地物种占领,从而形成新的群落。在这里,我们研究了本地和非本地物种之间的物候是否以及如何变化。我们还研究了功能特征和/或系统发育是否可以解释这些物候变化。地点:欧洲和亚洲。时间周期2022年。多年生草本植物的主要分类群。方法对13个植物园427种植物的多物候期和功能性状进行了研究。我们使用线性混合模型来测试本地和非本地物种之间的物候和功能性状差异。采用增强回归树方法确定了本地和非本地物种物候差异的功能性状预测因子。为了测试系统发育对这些物候变化的影响,我们使用Pagel λ估计系统发育信号。结果本地种与非本地种具有明显的物候模式和功能特征。本地种营养物候期开始早于外地种,衰老晚于外地种。同样,繁殖物候期也各不相同,本地物种开花较早,开花和结果持续时间较长。本地种具有较高的比叶面积,而非本地种具有较高的种子质量和较大的比叶面积。物候变化主要由园地位置、叶面积、株高和叶片氮来解释。大多数物候期和功能性状表现出较低的系统进化保守性,表明局部环境因素在驱动这些变异中起着更重要的作用。本研究结果表明,在全球变化的背景下,本地和非本地物种的物候差异可能会改变群落组成和结构。非本地物种可能占据本地物候生态位的一个子集,这种重叠可能改变生物相互作用和生态系统功能。未来的研究需要在自然的野外条件下证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional Traits and Phylogeny Explain Plant Phenological Variations Among Native and Non-Native Species in Botanical Gardens

Aim

Phenological shifts are regarded to be the most pronounced indicators of global climate change. Worldwide, native species pools are being increasingly colonised by non-native species, thus shaping novel communities. Here, we investigate whether, and how, phenology varies between native and non-native species. We also examine whether functional traits and/or phylogeny can explain these phenological variations.

Location

Europe and Asia.

Time Period

2022.

Major Taxa Studied

Perennial herbs.

Methods

We studied multiple phenophases and functional traits of 427 plant species across 13 botanical gardens using the PhenObs monitoring protocol. We used linear mixed models to test for phenology and functional trait differences between native and non-native species. Boosted regression trees were employed to identify the functional trait predictors of phenology variance between native and non-native species. To test the effect of phylogeny on these phenological variations, we estimated phylogenetic signal using Pagel's λ.

Results

Native and non-native species exhibited distinct phenological patterns and functional traits. Native species started vegetative phenophases earlier than non-native species and senesced later. Similarly, reproductive phenophases varied, with native species flowering earlier and having longer flowering and fruiting durations. Native species also had higher specific leaf area, while non-native species had higher seed mass and larger leaf area. The variations in phenology were explained by garden location, leaf area, plant height, and leaf nitrogen. Most phenophases and functional traits showed low phylogenetic conservatism, suggesting a more important role of local environmental factors in driving these variations.

Main Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the phenological differences between native and non-native species, both in timing and magnitude, may change the community composition and structure under global change. Non-native species likely occupy a subset of native phenological niches, and this overlap may alter biotic interactions and ecosystem functioning. Future research needs to substantiate our findings under natural field conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信