“失去的故事”-设计和评估病人为医学生主导的围产期丧亲计划

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-07-16 DOI:10.1111/tct.70146
Clare Kennedy, Alison Lynch, Nina Doyle, Susanne Brodigan, Laura Guild, Mary F. Higgins
{"title":"“失去的故事”-设计和评估病人为医学生主导的围产期丧亲计划","authors":"Clare Kennedy,&nbsp;Alison Lynch,&nbsp;Nina Doyle,&nbsp;Susanne Brodigan,&nbsp;Laura Guild,&nbsp;Mary F. Higgins","doi":"10.1111/tct.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Providing bereavement support to parents who have experienced a perinatal loss requires knowledge, empathy and sensitivity. Undergraduate opportunities to learn directly from parents with personal experience remain limited. This study assessed medical students' responses to parent-led stories on perinatal loss, evaluating their self-reported changes in knowledge, skills and self-awareness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>Final-year medical students in University College Dublin participated in a new educational initiative featuring parent-educators from three perinatal loss advocacy groups. Each session focused on the parents' personal experiences of pregnancy loss and was designed collaboratively with the authors and independently led by the parents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Evaluation used a validated preintervention and postintervention questionnaire—the Perinatal Bereavement Care Confidence Scale (PBCCS). This measures self-reported knowledge, support skills and self-awareness in providing bereavement care. Students also provided free-text comments on confidence promoters, inhibitors and suggestions for improvement. Statistically significant improvements were observed across all three domains of the PBCCS following the educational sessions. Knowledge scores increased 28.2%, from 2.80 to 3.59 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.39). Skills rose 43.1%, from 2.16 to 3.09 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; <i>d</i> = 0.65). Self-awareness increased 21.6%, from 3.29 to 4.00 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Thematic content analysis of free-text responses revealed a lack of experience and fear of ‘saying the wrong thing’ as confidence inhibitors. Postintervention responses highlighted the value of hearing from the bereaved parents, with students calling for continued parent-educator sessions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot educational programme highlights the value of in-person, parent-led education and suggests that integrating the lived experience can better prepare students to provide bereavement care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70146","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Stories of Loss’—Designing and Evaluating a Patient-Led Perinatal Bereavement Programme for Medical Students\",\"authors\":\"Clare Kennedy,&nbsp;Alison Lynch,&nbsp;Nina Doyle,&nbsp;Susanne Brodigan,&nbsp;Laura Guild,&nbsp;Mary F. Higgins\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.70146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Providing bereavement support to parents who have experienced a perinatal loss requires knowledge, empathy and sensitivity. Undergraduate opportunities to learn directly from parents with personal experience remain limited. This study assessed medical students' responses to parent-led stories on perinatal loss, evaluating their self-reported changes in knowledge, skills and self-awareness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Approach</h3>\\n \\n <p>Final-year medical students in University College Dublin participated in a new educational initiative featuring parent-educators from three perinatal loss advocacy groups. Each session focused on the parents' personal experiences of pregnancy loss and was designed collaboratively with the authors and independently led by the parents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\\n \\n <p>Evaluation used a validated preintervention and postintervention questionnaire—the Perinatal Bereavement Care Confidence Scale (PBCCS). This measures self-reported knowledge, support skills and self-awareness in providing bereavement care. Students also provided free-text comments on confidence promoters, inhibitors and suggestions for improvement. Statistically significant improvements were observed across all three domains of the PBCCS following the educational sessions. Knowledge scores increased 28.2%, from 2.80 to 3.59 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.39). Skills rose 43.1%, from 2.16 to 3.09 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; <i>d</i> = 0.65). Self-awareness increased 21.6%, from 3.29 to 4.00 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Thematic content analysis of free-text responses revealed a lack of experience and fear of ‘saying the wrong thing’ as confidence inhibitors. Postintervention responses highlighted the value of hearing from the bereaved parents, with students calling for continued parent-educator sessions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>This pilot educational programme highlights the value of in-person, parent-led education and suggests that integrating the lived experience can better prepare students to provide bereavement care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70146\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为经历了围产期损失的父母提供丧亲支持需要知识、同理心和敏感性。大学生直接向父母学习个人经验的机会仍然有限。本研究评估了医学生对父母主导的围产期损失故事的反应,评估了他们自我报告的知识、技能和自我意识的变化。方法都柏林大学医学院最后一年级的学生参加了一项新的教育倡议,其中包括来自三个围产期损失倡导团体的家长教育工作者。每个环节都侧重于父母流产的个人经历,并与作者合作设计,由父母独立主导。评估使用了一份经过验证的干预前和干预后问卷-围产期丧亲护理信心量表(PBCCS)。这是衡量在提供丧亲护理方面自我报告的知识、支持技能和自我意识。学生们还提供了关于信心促进者、抑制者和改进建议的自由文本评论。在教育课程之后,在PBCCS的所有三个领域都观察到统计学上显著的改善。知识分从2.80分提高到3.59分,提高28.2% (p < 0.01;Cohen’s d = 0.39)。技能指数上升43.1%,从2.16升至3.09 (p < 0.001;d = 0.65)。自我意识增加了21.6%,从3.29增加到4.00 (p < 0.001)。对自由文本回复的主题内容分析显示,缺乏经验和害怕“说错话”是信心的抑制因素。干预后的回应强调了听取失去亲人的父母的意见的价值,学生们呼吁继续举行家长教育会议。启示这个试点教育计划突出了面对面的、家长主导的教育的价值,并建议将生活经验结合起来,可以更好地为学生提供丧亲关怀做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

‘Stories of Loss’—Designing and Evaluating a Patient-Led Perinatal Bereavement Programme for Medical Students

‘Stories of Loss’—Designing and Evaluating a Patient-Led Perinatal Bereavement Programme for Medical Students

‘Stories of Loss’—Designing and Evaluating a Patient-Led Perinatal Bereavement Programme for Medical Students

‘Stories of Loss’—Designing and Evaluating a Patient-Led Perinatal Bereavement Programme for Medical Students

‘Stories of Loss’—Designing and Evaluating a Patient-Led Perinatal Bereavement Programme for Medical Students

Background

Providing bereavement support to parents who have experienced a perinatal loss requires knowledge, empathy and sensitivity. Undergraduate opportunities to learn directly from parents with personal experience remain limited. This study assessed medical students' responses to parent-led stories on perinatal loss, evaluating their self-reported changes in knowledge, skills and self-awareness.

Approach

Final-year medical students in University College Dublin participated in a new educational initiative featuring parent-educators from three perinatal loss advocacy groups. Each session focused on the parents' personal experiences of pregnancy loss and was designed collaboratively with the authors and independently led by the parents.

Evaluation

Evaluation used a validated preintervention and postintervention questionnaire—the Perinatal Bereavement Care Confidence Scale (PBCCS). This measures self-reported knowledge, support skills and self-awareness in providing bereavement care. Students also provided free-text comments on confidence promoters, inhibitors and suggestions for improvement. Statistically significant improvements were observed across all three domains of the PBCCS following the educational sessions. Knowledge scores increased 28.2%, from 2.80 to 3.59 (p < 0.01; Cohen's d = 0.39). Skills rose 43.1%, from 2.16 to 3.09 (p < 0.001; d = 0.65). Self-awareness increased 21.6%, from 3.29 to 4.00 (p < 0.001). Thematic content analysis of free-text responses revealed a lack of experience and fear of ‘saying the wrong thing’ as confidence inhibitors. Postintervention responses highlighted the value of hearing from the bereaved parents, with students calling for continued parent-educator sessions.

Implications

This pilot educational programme highlights the value of in-person, parent-led education and suggests that integrating the lived experience can better prepare students to provide bereavement care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信