Sydney R Lambert,Sophia A Bibb,Nicole E Keller,Samuel E Cooper,Joseph E Dunsmoor
{"title":"弱学习和保留间隔的性质如何影响情景记忆的行为标记。","authors":"Sydney R Lambert,Sophia A Bibb,Nicole E Keller,Samuel E Cooper,Joseph E Dunsmoor","doi":"10.1037/xge0001803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emotional experiences can promote memory consolidation of weakly learned events encoded around the same time. This memory enhancement through temporal convergence between a weak and strong event accords with the behavioral tagging hypothesis, a behavioral analog of the synaptic tagging model for cellular plasticity. There is evidence for a behavioral tagging process in human episodic memory. However, the conditions necessary to stabilize episodic memory through association with a more meaningful event remain vague. Here, we investigated whether the nature of the \"weak\" event and length of the retention interval are boundary conditions underlying selective retroactive memory enhancements. Participants encoded trial-unique items from two semantic categories before, during, and after fear conditioning that involved pairing one category with electric shock. Memory was tested either 24 hr or 1 month later. Importantly, some participants did not expect shocks during weak learning and were administered electric shocks only after weak learning, while other participants experienced shocks before weak learning and expected shocks throughout every encoding phase. Results showed that participants who weakly encoded category exemplars without presumed threat of shock prior to fear conditioning exhibited selective retroactive memory enhancements that survived up to 1 month later. By contrast, altering the nature of \"weak\" encoding through prearousal and threat expectancy prevented selective retroactive enhancements at 24 hr; however, a selective retroactive enhancement did emerge when memory was tested 1 month later. These findings suggest that sufficiently encoded events fail to profit from additional modulation by subsequent emotional learning when tested at relatively short retention intervals. However, selective retroactive preservation for information conceptually related to an emotional event is revealed over longer retention intervals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the nature of weak learning and retention interval affects behavioral tagging of episodic memory.\",\"authors\":\"Sydney R Lambert,Sophia A Bibb,Nicole E Keller,Samuel E Cooper,Joseph E Dunsmoor\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xge0001803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Emotional experiences can promote memory consolidation of weakly learned events encoded around the same time. This memory enhancement through temporal convergence between a weak and strong event accords with the behavioral tagging hypothesis, a behavioral analog of the synaptic tagging model for cellular plasticity. There is evidence for a behavioral tagging process in human episodic memory. However, the conditions necessary to stabilize episodic memory through association with a more meaningful event remain vague. Here, we investigated whether the nature of the \\\"weak\\\" event and length of the retention interval are boundary conditions underlying selective retroactive memory enhancements. Participants encoded trial-unique items from two semantic categories before, during, and after fear conditioning that involved pairing one category with electric shock. Memory was tested either 24 hr or 1 month later. Importantly, some participants did not expect shocks during weak learning and were administered electric shocks only after weak learning, while other participants experienced shocks before weak learning and expected shocks throughout every encoding phase. Results showed that participants who weakly encoded category exemplars without presumed threat of shock prior to fear conditioning exhibited selective retroactive memory enhancements that survived up to 1 month later. By contrast, altering the nature of \\\"weak\\\" encoding through prearousal and threat expectancy prevented selective retroactive enhancements at 24 hr; however, a selective retroactive enhancement did emerge when memory was tested 1 month later. These findings suggest that sufficiently encoded events fail to profit from additional modulation by subsequent emotional learning when tested at relatively short retention intervals. However, selective retroactive preservation for information conceptually related to an emotional event is revealed over longer retention intervals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":15698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001803\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001803","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
情绪体验可以促进在同一时间编码的弱学习事件的记忆巩固。这种通过弱事件和强事件之间的时间收敛而增强的记忆符合行为标记假说,这是细胞可塑性的突触标记模型的行为类比。有证据表明人类情景记忆中存在行为标记过程。然而,通过与更有意义的事件相联系来稳定情景记忆的必要条件仍然模糊不清。在这里,我们研究了“弱”事件的性质和保留间隔的长度是否是选择性回溯记忆增强的边界条件。参与者在恐惧条件反射之前、过程中和之后分别对两个语义类别中的试验唯一项目进行编码,其中一个类别与电击相结合。记忆在24小时或1个月后进行测试。重要的是,一些参与者在弱学习期间没有预料到电击,只是在弱学习之后才受到电击,而其他参与者在弱学习之前经历了电击,并在每个编码阶段都预期会受到电击。结果表明,在恐惧条件反射之前,没有预设电击威胁的弱编码类别样本的参与者表现出选择性的回溯记忆增强,并在1个月后存活。相比之下,通过预唤醒和威胁预期来改变“弱”编码的性质可以在24小时内阻止选择性的回溯增强;然而,在1个月后测试记忆时,确实出现了选择性的回溯性增强。这些发现表明,在相对较短的保留时间内进行测试时,充分编码的事件无法从后续情绪学习的额外调节中获益。然而,与情感事件概念相关的信息的选择性追溯保存在较长的保留间隔内被揭示出来。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
How the nature of weak learning and retention interval affects behavioral tagging of episodic memory.
Emotional experiences can promote memory consolidation of weakly learned events encoded around the same time. This memory enhancement through temporal convergence between a weak and strong event accords with the behavioral tagging hypothesis, a behavioral analog of the synaptic tagging model for cellular plasticity. There is evidence for a behavioral tagging process in human episodic memory. However, the conditions necessary to stabilize episodic memory through association with a more meaningful event remain vague. Here, we investigated whether the nature of the "weak" event and length of the retention interval are boundary conditions underlying selective retroactive memory enhancements. Participants encoded trial-unique items from two semantic categories before, during, and after fear conditioning that involved pairing one category with electric shock. Memory was tested either 24 hr or 1 month later. Importantly, some participants did not expect shocks during weak learning and were administered electric shocks only after weak learning, while other participants experienced shocks before weak learning and expected shocks throughout every encoding phase. Results showed that participants who weakly encoded category exemplars without presumed threat of shock prior to fear conditioning exhibited selective retroactive memory enhancements that survived up to 1 month later. By contrast, altering the nature of "weak" encoding through prearousal and threat expectancy prevented selective retroactive enhancements at 24 hr; however, a selective retroactive enhancement did emerge when memory was tested 1 month later. These findings suggest that sufficiently encoded events fail to profit from additional modulation by subsequent emotional learning when tested at relatively short retention intervals. However, selective retroactive preservation for information conceptually related to an emotional event is revealed over longer retention intervals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General publishes articles describing empirical work that bridges the traditional interests of two or more communities of psychology. The work may touch on issues dealt with in JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, JEP: Human Perception and Performance, JEP: Animal Behavior Processes, or JEP: Applied, but may also concern issues in other subdisciplines of psychology, including social processes, developmental processes, psychopathology, neuroscience, or computational modeling. Articles in JEP: General may be longer than the usual journal publication if necessary, but shorter articles that bridge subdisciplines will also be considered.