Sue Peters, Stanley H Hung, Mark T Bayley, Krista L Best, Louise A Connell, Sarah J Donkers, Sean P Dukelow, Victor E Ezeugwu, Marie-Hélène Milot, Brodie M Sakakibara, Lisa Sheehy, Hubert Wong, Yuwei Yang, Jennifer Yao, Janice J Eng
{"title":"加拿大物理治疗师为住院中风康复患者提供的Walk ' n Watch结构化渐进式运动方案的安全性和有效性:一项3期、多地点、实用、楔形踏步、集群随机对照试验","authors":"Sue Peters, Stanley H Hung, Mark T Bayley, Krista L Best, Louise A Connell, Sarah J Donkers, Sean P Dukelow, Victor E Ezeugwu, Marie-Hélène Milot, Brodie M Sakakibara, Lisa Sheehy, Hubert Wong, Yuwei Yang, Jennifer Yao, Janice J Eng","doi":"10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00201-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Although clinical guidelines support high repetitions of walking after stroke, practice is slow to change. We undertook an implementation trial to enable entire stroke units to use the Walk ‘n Watch structured, progressive exercise protocol. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Walk ‘n Watch implementation package on patient outcomes after 4 weeks in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting.<h3>Methods</h3>This pragmatic phase 3, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial took place in 12 sites (inpatient stroke rehabilitation units) across seven Canadian provinces. Each site was randomly allocated (1:1:1:1) to one of four transition sequences with three sites in each sequence. Sites changed practice from usual care to Walk ‘n Watch at different times according to their allocation. All front-line physical therapists were trained to deliver the Walk ‘n Watch protocol. Walk ‘n Watch required completion of a minimum of 30 min of walking-related activities per session, which progressively increased in intensity based on heart rate and step count monitors. Progressions were prescribed on the basis of a screening 6-minute walk test (6MWT) done by the front-line physical therapist as part of the protocol. The primary endpoint was walking endurance (6MWT) at 4 weeks after randomisation. Masked assessors completed evaluations at baseline and 4 weeks later. The primary analysis used a linear mixed-effects model adjusted for unit size, stratum, calendar time, age, sex, and baseline 6MWT. This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT04238260</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Between June 4, 2021, and March 1, 2024, we enrolled 12 sites with 314 participants, of whom eight were deemed ineligible after enrolment and 306 were included in the primary analysis (162 in the usual care group, 144 in the Walk ‘n Watch group). Participants had a mean age of 68 years (SD 13), a mean time since stroke of 29 days (17), and a baseline 6MWT of 152 m (106). 188 (61%) were male and 118 (39%) were female. The mean 6MWT in the usual care group was 137·1 m (100·9) at baseline and 223·6 m (130·4) after 4 weeks. The mean 6MWT in the Walk ‘n Watch group was 163·6 m (112·7) at baseline and 297·2 m (133·2) after 4 weeks. The 6MWT improvement was 43·6 m (95% CI 12·7–76·1) greater in the Walk ‘n Watch group than in the usual care group. No serious adverse events occurred during a Walk ‘n Watch session. Nine serious adverse events were reported and required admission to acute care (four were recorded in the usual care group and five in the Walk ‘n Watch group).<h3>Interpretation</h3>The Walk ‘n Watch protocol resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in walking endurance in patients with subacute stroke in a real-world setting. The protocol can be readily implemented into practice with minimal additional resources. Further research is needed to identify characteristics of patients who might benefit the most from Walk ‘n Watch.<h3>Funding</h3>Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Brain Research Fund, Michael Smith Health Research BC, Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, Canada Research Program, and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.","PeriodicalId":22676,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Neurology","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and effectiveness of the Walk ‘n Watch structured, progressive exercise protocol delivered by physical therapists for inpatient stroke rehabilitation in Canada: a phase 3, multisite, pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Sue Peters, Stanley H Hung, Mark T Bayley, Krista L Best, Louise A Connell, Sarah J Donkers, Sean P Dukelow, Victor E Ezeugwu, Marie-Hélène Milot, Brodie M Sakakibara, Lisa Sheehy, Hubert Wong, Yuwei Yang, Jennifer Yao, Janice J Eng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00201-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>Although clinical guidelines support high repetitions of walking after stroke, practice is slow to change. We undertook an implementation trial to enable entire stroke units to use the Walk ‘n Watch structured, progressive exercise protocol. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Walk ‘n Watch implementation package on patient outcomes after 4 weeks in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting.<h3>Methods</h3>This pragmatic phase 3, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial took place in 12 sites (inpatient stroke rehabilitation units) across seven Canadian provinces. Each site was randomly allocated (1:1:1:1) to one of four transition sequences with three sites in each sequence. Sites changed practice from usual care to Walk ‘n Watch at different times according to their allocation. All front-line physical therapists were trained to deliver the Walk ‘n Watch protocol. Walk ‘n Watch required completion of a minimum of 30 min of walking-related activities per session, which progressively increased in intensity based on heart rate and step count monitors. Progressions were prescribed on the basis of a screening 6-minute walk test (6MWT) done by the front-line physical therapist as part of the protocol. The primary endpoint was walking endurance (6MWT) at 4 weeks after randomisation. Masked assessors completed evaluations at baseline and 4 weeks later. The primary analysis used a linear mixed-effects model adjusted for unit size, stratum, calendar time, age, sex, and baseline 6MWT. This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT04238260</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>, and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Between June 4, 2021, and March 1, 2024, we enrolled 12 sites with 314 participants, of whom eight were deemed ineligible after enrolment and 306 were included in the primary analysis (162 in the usual care group, 144 in the Walk ‘n Watch group). Participants had a mean age of 68 years (SD 13), a mean time since stroke of 29 days (17), and a baseline 6MWT of 152 m (106). 188 (61%) were male and 118 (39%) were female. The mean 6MWT in the usual care group was 137·1 m (100·9) at baseline and 223·6 m (130·4) after 4 weeks. The mean 6MWT in the Walk ‘n Watch group was 163·6 m (112·7) at baseline and 297·2 m (133·2) after 4 weeks. The 6MWT improvement was 43·6 m (95% CI 12·7–76·1) greater in the Walk ‘n Watch group than in the usual care group. No serious adverse events occurred during a Walk ‘n Watch session. Nine serious adverse events were reported and required admission to acute care (four were recorded in the usual care group and five in the Walk ‘n Watch group).<h3>Interpretation</h3>The Walk ‘n Watch protocol resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in walking endurance in patients with subacute stroke in a real-world setting. The protocol can be readily implemented into practice with minimal additional resources. Further research is needed to identify characteristics of patients who might benefit the most from Walk ‘n Watch.<h3>Funding</h3>Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Brain Research Fund, Michael Smith Health Research BC, Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, Canada Research Program, and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Neurology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00201-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00201-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管临床指南支持卒中后高强度的步行,但实践变化缓慢。我们进行了一项实施试验,使整个中风单位都能使用Walk ' n Watch结构化的渐进式运动方案。我们的目的是评估步行观察实施方案对住院中风康复患者4周后预后的有效性。这项实用的3期、楔形分步、集群随机对照试验在加拿大7个省的12个地点(住院卒中康复单位)进行。每个位点被随机分配(1:1:1:1)到四个过渡序列中的一个,每个序列中有三个位点。各站点根据分配情况,在不同时间将常规护理改为“边走边看”。所有的一线理疗师都接受过“步行观察”方案的培训。Walk ' n Watch要求每次至少完成30分钟的步行相关活动,并根据心率和步数监视器逐渐增加强度。作为治疗方案的一部分,一线物理治疗师在6分钟步行测试(6MWT)的筛选基础上规定了进展。主要终点是随机分组后4周的行走耐力(6MWT)。蒙面评估者在基线和4周后完成评估。初步分析采用线性混合效应模型,调整了单位大小、地层、日历时间、年龄、性别和基线6MWT。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT04238260,并且已经完成。在2021年6月4日至2024年3月1日期间,我们纳入了12个站点,共有314名参与者,其中8人在入组后被认为不合格,306人被纳入主要分析(162人在常规护理组,144人在步行观察组)。参与者的平均年龄为68岁(SD 13),平均中风时间为29天(17),基线6MWT为152米(106)。男性188例(61%),女性118例(39%)。常规护理组的平均6MWT基线时为137·1 m(100·9),4周后为223·6 m(130·4)。Walk ' n Watch组的平均6MWT在基线时为163·6 m(112·7),4周后为297·2 m(133·2)。Walk ' n Watch组的6MWT改善为43.6 m (95% CI 12.7 - 76.1),高于常规护理组。在步行观察期间没有发生严重的不良事件。报告了9例严重不良事件,需要入院接受急性护理(常规护理组记录了4例,步行观察组记录了5例)。在现实世界的环境中,步行观察方案导致亚急性卒中患者的步行耐力有临床意义的改善。该协议可以很容易地实现到实践中,只需很少的额外资源。需要进一步的研究来确定可能从“步行观察”中获益最多的患者的特征。资助项目:加拿大卫生研究院、加拿大脑研究基金、加拿大迈克尔·史密斯健康研究BC、加拿大quachey - sant研究基金会、加拿大研究项目、加拿大心脏病和中风基金会。
Safety and effectiveness of the Walk ‘n Watch structured, progressive exercise protocol delivered by physical therapists for inpatient stroke rehabilitation in Canada: a phase 3, multisite, pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial
Background
Although clinical guidelines support high repetitions of walking after stroke, practice is slow to change. We undertook an implementation trial to enable entire stroke units to use the Walk ‘n Watch structured, progressive exercise protocol. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Walk ‘n Watch implementation package on patient outcomes after 4 weeks in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting.
Methods
This pragmatic phase 3, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial took place in 12 sites (inpatient stroke rehabilitation units) across seven Canadian provinces. Each site was randomly allocated (1:1:1:1) to one of four transition sequences with three sites in each sequence. Sites changed practice from usual care to Walk ‘n Watch at different times according to their allocation. All front-line physical therapists were trained to deliver the Walk ‘n Watch protocol. Walk ‘n Watch required completion of a minimum of 30 min of walking-related activities per session, which progressively increased in intensity based on heart rate and step count monitors. Progressions were prescribed on the basis of a screening 6-minute walk test (6MWT) done by the front-line physical therapist as part of the protocol. The primary endpoint was walking endurance (6MWT) at 4 weeks after randomisation. Masked assessors completed evaluations at baseline and 4 weeks later. The primary analysis used a linear mixed-effects model adjusted for unit size, stratum, calendar time, age, sex, and baseline 6MWT. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04238260, and is complete.
Findings
Between June 4, 2021, and March 1, 2024, we enrolled 12 sites with 314 participants, of whom eight were deemed ineligible after enrolment and 306 were included in the primary analysis (162 in the usual care group, 144 in the Walk ‘n Watch group). Participants had a mean age of 68 years (SD 13), a mean time since stroke of 29 days (17), and a baseline 6MWT of 152 m (106). 188 (61%) were male and 118 (39%) were female. The mean 6MWT in the usual care group was 137·1 m (100·9) at baseline and 223·6 m (130·4) after 4 weeks. The mean 6MWT in the Walk ‘n Watch group was 163·6 m (112·7) at baseline and 297·2 m (133·2) after 4 weeks. The 6MWT improvement was 43·6 m (95% CI 12·7–76·1) greater in the Walk ‘n Watch group than in the usual care group. No serious adverse events occurred during a Walk ‘n Watch session. Nine serious adverse events were reported and required admission to acute care (four were recorded in the usual care group and five in the Walk ‘n Watch group).
Interpretation
The Walk ‘n Watch protocol resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in walking endurance in patients with subacute stroke in a real-world setting. The protocol can be readily implemented into practice with minimal additional resources. Further research is needed to identify characteristics of patients who might benefit the most from Walk ‘n Watch.
Funding
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Brain Research Fund, Michael Smith Health Research BC, Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, Canada Research Program, and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.