{"title":"多语、言语不流利和口吃:一个范围综述。","authors":"Gizem Aslan, Kurt Eggers","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This scoping review examined differences in types and/or frequency of speech disfluencies between multilingual individuals who do and do not stutter. We also examined whether language dominance and/or proficiency influences the types and frequency of speech disfluencies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. The search was conducted using inclusive search strings related to multilingualism and speech disfluencies in Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. The following information was extracted for each of the studies: general study information (authors, title, year, research field, geographic location), participant information (number of participants, types of study groups, age groups, language dyads), study method, types of collected speech samples, terms used for referring to disfluencies, the definition of the term \"disfluency,\" the types of disfluencies assessed, the proposed causal mechanism of disfluencies in multilinguals, the frequency of disfluencies, and identified group differences in disfluencies. Of the 792 records screened, 68 were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar types of speech disfluencies were present in the speech of multilinguals who do and do not stutter. However, a clear difference was apparent in the frequency of stuttering-like disfluencies between groups; the frequency of other disfluencies had a similar range. Monolingual guidelines do not apply to multilingual speakers. Finally, most records reported a higher frequency of speech disfluencies in both groups' less dominant and/or proficient language.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides insights on assessing stuttering in multilingual clients to avoid misdiagnosis of stuttering in this population. Research into the aspects of speech disfluencies in multilingual individuals who do and do not stutter is limited, and further research is warranted to deepen our understanding of how different aspects of multilingualism influence the manifestation of speech disfluencies in both groups. Therefore, there is a strong need for a systematic and uniform approach to define and evaluate speech disfluencies in multilinguals.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29441882.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multilingualism, Speech Disfluencies, and Stuttering: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Gizem Aslan, Kurt Eggers\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This scoping review examined differences in types and/or frequency of speech disfluencies between multilingual individuals who do and do not stutter. We also examined whether language dominance and/or proficiency influences the types and frequency of speech disfluencies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. The search was conducted using inclusive search strings related to multilingualism and speech disfluencies in Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. The following information was extracted for each of the studies: general study information (authors, title, year, research field, geographic location), participant information (number of participants, types of study groups, age groups, language dyads), study method, types of collected speech samples, terms used for referring to disfluencies, the definition of the term \\\"disfluency,\\\" the types of disfluencies assessed, the proposed causal mechanism of disfluencies in multilinguals, the frequency of disfluencies, and identified group differences in disfluencies. Of the 792 records screened, 68 were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar types of speech disfluencies were present in the speech of multilinguals who do and do not stutter. However, a clear difference was apparent in the frequency of stuttering-like disfluencies between groups; the frequency of other disfluencies had a similar range. Monolingual guidelines do not apply to multilingual speakers. Finally, most records reported a higher frequency of speech disfluencies in both groups' less dominant and/or proficient language.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides insights on assessing stuttering in multilingual clients to avoid misdiagnosis of stuttering in this population. Research into the aspects of speech disfluencies in multilingual individuals who do and do not stutter is limited, and further research is warranted to deepen our understanding of how different aspects of multilingualism influence the manifestation of speech disfluencies in both groups. Therefore, there is a strong need for a systematic and uniform approach to define and evaluate speech disfluencies in multilinguals.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29441882.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本综述研究了多语种口吃者和非口吃者在言语不流利类型和/或频率上的差异。我们还研究了语言优势和/或熟练程度是否会影响言语不流利的类型和频率。方法:按照系统评价和元分析扩展范围评价指南的首选报告项目进行评价。使用与Medline、Web of Science、Scopus和Embase中的多语言和语音不流畅相关的包容性搜索字符串进行搜索。从每项研究中提取了以下信息:一般研究信息(作者、标题、年份、研究领域、地理位置)、参与者信息(参与者人数、研究组类型、年龄组、语言组合)、研究方法、收集的语音样本类型、用于指代不流利的术语、“不流利”一词的定义、所评估的不流利的类型,提出的多语不流利的因果机制,不流利的频率,以及确定的不流利的群体差异。在筛选的792份记录中,68份被纳入审查。结果:多语者的言语中存在着相似类型的言语不流利。然而,两组之间出现类似口吃的不流畅的频率明显不同;其他不流畅的频率也有类似的范围。单语指南不适用于多语使用者。最后,大多数记录显示,在两组不太占主导地位和/或熟练的语言中,言语不流利的频率更高。结论:本综述提供了评估多语言患者口吃的见解,以避免这一人群中口吃的误诊。对多语种口吃者和非口吃者言语不流畅方面的研究是有限的,进一步的研究是必要的,以加深我们对多语种不同方面如何影响两组言语不流畅表现的理解。因此,迫切需要一个系统和统一的方法来定义和评估多语者的言语不流畅。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29441882。
Multilingualism, Speech Disfluencies, and Stuttering: A Scoping Review.
Purpose: This scoping review examined differences in types and/or frequency of speech disfluencies between multilingual individuals who do and do not stutter. We also examined whether language dominance and/or proficiency influences the types and frequency of speech disfluencies.
Method: The review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. The search was conducted using inclusive search strings related to multilingualism and speech disfluencies in Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. The following information was extracted for each of the studies: general study information (authors, title, year, research field, geographic location), participant information (number of participants, types of study groups, age groups, language dyads), study method, types of collected speech samples, terms used for referring to disfluencies, the definition of the term "disfluency," the types of disfluencies assessed, the proposed causal mechanism of disfluencies in multilinguals, the frequency of disfluencies, and identified group differences in disfluencies. Of the 792 records screened, 68 were included in the review.
Results: Similar types of speech disfluencies were present in the speech of multilinguals who do and do not stutter. However, a clear difference was apparent in the frequency of stuttering-like disfluencies between groups; the frequency of other disfluencies had a similar range. Monolingual guidelines do not apply to multilingual speakers. Finally, most records reported a higher frequency of speech disfluencies in both groups' less dominant and/or proficient language.
Conclusions: This review provides insights on assessing stuttering in multilingual clients to avoid misdiagnosis of stuttering in this population. Research into the aspects of speech disfluencies in multilingual individuals who do and do not stutter is limited, and further research is warranted to deepen our understanding of how different aspects of multilingualism influence the manifestation of speech disfluencies in both groups. Therefore, there is a strong need for a systematic and uniform approach to define and evaluate speech disfluencies in multilinguals.