阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者持续气道正压治疗的长期依从性模式和稳定性:一项队列研究。

IF 2
Karin Jeppesen, Asbjørn Kørvel-Hanquist, Donna Lykke Wolff, Sofie Ronja Petersen, Preben Homøe, Eva Kirkegaard Kiær, Poul Jørgen Jennum, Helene Skjøt-Arkil
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者持续气道正压治疗的长期依从性模式和稳定性:一项队列研究。","authors":"Karin Jeppesen, Asbjørn Kørvel-Hanquist, Donna Lykke Wolff, Sofie Ronja Petersen, Preben Homøe, Eva Kirkegaard Kiær, Poul Jørgen Jennum, Helene Skjøt-Arkil","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03418-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>• Despite being the gold standard for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy faces a persistent challenge: patient adherence. This study aimed to investigate long-term adherence and stabilisation patterns after initiating CPAP therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>• We conducted a multicenter cohort study using tele-monitored CPAP data from adult patients treated for at least 24 months at two Danish sleep clinics. These data were combined with local hospital administrative data and national registry data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>• The study included data from 1,907 OSA patients who had initiated CPAP. The median age was 55 years (SD 12.5), and 26% were females. After long-term CPAP therapy, 45% of the OSA patients had achieved high adherence to CPAP, while 39% were CPAP non-adherent, and 16% of the patients were in the low-adherent group. The probability of high adherence after two years was 79% if the patient achieved high adherence within the first month. All groups showed stability within the first three months after CPAP initiation, particularly for the CPAP non-adherent patients and the patients with high adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>• We found that less than half of the OSA patients achieved high adherence to CPAP therapy 24 months after CPAP initiation. Patients who achieved high adherence within the first month were more likely to maintain it.</p>","PeriodicalId":520777,"journal":{"name":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","volume":"29 4","pages":"243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns and stability of long-term adherence in continuous positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: a cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Karin Jeppesen, Asbjørn Kørvel-Hanquist, Donna Lykke Wolff, Sofie Ronja Petersen, Preben Homøe, Eva Kirkegaard Kiær, Poul Jørgen Jennum, Helene Skjøt-Arkil\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11325-025-03418-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>• Despite being the gold standard for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy faces a persistent challenge: patient adherence. This study aimed to investigate long-term adherence and stabilisation patterns after initiating CPAP therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>• We conducted a multicenter cohort study using tele-monitored CPAP data from adult patients treated for at least 24 months at two Danish sleep clinics. These data were combined with local hospital administrative data and national registry data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>• The study included data from 1,907 OSA patients who had initiated CPAP. The median age was 55 years (SD 12.5), and 26% were females. After long-term CPAP therapy, 45% of the OSA patients had achieved high adherence to CPAP, while 39% were CPAP non-adherent, and 16% of the patients were in the low-adherent group. The probability of high adherence after two years was 79% if the patient achieved high adherence within the first month. All groups showed stability within the first three months after CPAP initiation, particularly for the CPAP non-adherent patients and the patients with high adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>• We found that less than half of the OSA patients achieved high adherence to CPAP therapy 24 months after CPAP initiation. Patients who achieved high adherence within the first month were more likely to maintain it.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263751/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03418-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03418-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:•尽管是治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的金标准,持续气道正压(CPAP)治疗面临着一个持续的挑战:患者的依从性。本研究旨在调查开始CPAP治疗后的长期依从性和稳定性模式。方法:•我们进行了一项多中心队列研究,使用远程监测的CPAP数据,这些数据来自在丹麦两家睡眠诊所治疗至少24个月的成年患者。这些数据与当地医院管理数据和国家登记数据相结合。•该研究纳入了1907例开始CPAP的OSA患者的数据。中位年龄为55岁(标准差12.5),26%为女性。经过长期CPAP治疗,45%的OSA患者达到了CPAP的高依从性,39%的患者为CPAP非依从性,16%的患者为低依从性组。如果患者在第一个月内达到高依从性,两年后高依从性的概率为79%。所有组在CPAP启动后的前三个月内均表现出稳定性,特别是对于CPAP非依从性患者和高依从性患者。结论:•我们发现,在开始CPAP治疗24个月后,不到一半的OSA患者达到了高依从性。在第一个月内达到高依从性的患者更有可能坚持下去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patterns and stability of long-term adherence in continuous positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: a cohort study.

Patterns and stability of long-term adherence in continuous positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: a cohort study.

Patterns and stability of long-term adherence in continuous positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: a cohort study.

Patterns and stability of long-term adherence in continuous positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: a cohort study.

Purpose: • Despite being the gold standard for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy faces a persistent challenge: patient adherence. This study aimed to investigate long-term adherence and stabilisation patterns after initiating CPAP therapy.

Methods: • We conducted a multicenter cohort study using tele-monitored CPAP data from adult patients treated for at least 24 months at two Danish sleep clinics. These data were combined with local hospital administrative data and national registry data.

Results: • The study included data from 1,907 OSA patients who had initiated CPAP. The median age was 55 years (SD 12.5), and 26% were females. After long-term CPAP therapy, 45% of the OSA patients had achieved high adherence to CPAP, while 39% were CPAP non-adherent, and 16% of the patients were in the low-adherent group. The probability of high adherence after two years was 79% if the patient achieved high adherence within the first month. All groups showed stability within the first three months after CPAP initiation, particularly for the CPAP non-adherent patients and the patients with high adherence.

Conclusion: • We found that less than half of the OSA patients achieved high adherence to CPAP therapy 24 months after CPAP initiation. Patients who achieved high adherence within the first month were more likely to maintain it.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信