Maria Carolina Guiotti de Oliveira, Stefani Jovedi Rosa, Bruno Carvalho de Vasconcelos, Rodrigo Ricci Vivan, Murilo Priori Alcalde, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte
{"title":"两种实验性预混硅酸钙密封剂的理化和力学性能评价。","authors":"Maria Carolina Guiotti de Oliveira, Stefani Jovedi Rosa, Bruno Carvalho de Vasconcelos, Rodrigo Ricci Vivan, Murilo Priori Alcalde, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte","doi":"10.1590/0103-644020255937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to evaluate the physicochemical properties of two experimental root canal sealers (CEO 1 and CEO 2) and compare them with Bio-C Sealer (BC) and AH Plus Bioceramic (AHPB). Setting time was evaluated following ISO 6876 Standard, radiopacity was assessed by radiographic analysis in millimeters of aluminum, and flow was also evaluated following ISO 6876. Solubility was assessed through mass loss (%) after 7 days of immersion in distilled water, hydroxyl and calcium ions release was measured by pH-meter and atomic absorption spectrophotometer, respectively. Push-out was tested at the universal test machine. The data were statistically compared using a 5% significance level. CEO 1 and CEO 2 showed higher setting times (p<0.05) and all sealers demonstrated radiopacity higher than 3mm/Al; however, lower radiopacity and flow values were detected in the presence of both experimental sealers when compared with BC and AHPB (p<0.05). No difference was found among all sealers for solubility (p>0.05). BC and CEO 2 had higher pH values at the initial time (p<0.05) while AHPB at the final time (p<0.05). In general, no significant difference between all sealers at all times was observed, except at 168h for CEO 1, which released more calcium ions than CEO 2 (p<0.05). BC and AHPB provided a superior push-out (p<0.05), and cohesive failures were predominant for all sealers. Both experimental sealers exhibited physicochemical properties similar to commercial endodontics sealers.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"e235937"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of physicochemical and mechanical properties of two experimental premixed calcium silicate sealers.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Carolina Guiotti de Oliveira, Stefani Jovedi Rosa, Bruno Carvalho de Vasconcelos, Rodrigo Ricci Vivan, Murilo Priori Alcalde, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-644020255937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study aimed to evaluate the physicochemical properties of two experimental root canal sealers (CEO 1 and CEO 2) and compare them with Bio-C Sealer (BC) and AH Plus Bioceramic (AHPB). Setting time was evaluated following ISO 6876 Standard, radiopacity was assessed by radiographic analysis in millimeters of aluminum, and flow was also evaluated following ISO 6876. Solubility was assessed through mass loss (%) after 7 days of immersion in distilled water, hydroxyl and calcium ions release was measured by pH-meter and atomic absorption spectrophotometer, respectively. Push-out was tested at the universal test machine. The data were statistically compared using a 5% significance level. CEO 1 and CEO 2 showed higher setting times (p<0.05) and all sealers demonstrated radiopacity higher than 3mm/Al; however, lower radiopacity and flow values were detected in the presence of both experimental sealers when compared with BC and AHPB (p<0.05). No difference was found among all sealers for solubility (p>0.05). BC and CEO 2 had higher pH values at the initial time (p<0.05) while AHPB at the final time (p<0.05). In general, no significant difference between all sealers at all times was observed, except at 168h for CEO 1, which released more calcium ions than CEO 2 (p<0.05). BC and AHPB provided a superior push-out (p<0.05), and cohesive failures were predominant for all sealers. Both experimental sealers exhibited physicochemical properties similar to commercial endodontics sealers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"e235937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266618/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020255937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020255937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在评价两种实验性根管密封材料(CEO 1和CEO 2)的理化性能,并与Bio-C密封材料(BC)和AH Plus Bioceramic根管密封材料(AHPB)进行比较。凝固时间按照ISO 6876标准进行评估,通过以毫米为单位的铝射线照相分析评估放射不透明度,并按照ISO 6876标准评估流量。在蒸馏水中浸泡7天后,用质量损失(%)测定溶解度,用ph计和原子吸收分光光度计分别测定羟基离子和钙离子的释放量。推出在通用试验机上进行了测试。数据采用5%显著性水平进行统计学比较。CEO 1和CEO 2的凝固次数较高(p0.05)。BC和ceo2在初始时间pH值较高(p
Evaluation of physicochemical and mechanical properties of two experimental premixed calcium silicate sealers.
The study aimed to evaluate the physicochemical properties of two experimental root canal sealers (CEO 1 and CEO 2) and compare them with Bio-C Sealer (BC) and AH Plus Bioceramic (AHPB). Setting time was evaluated following ISO 6876 Standard, radiopacity was assessed by radiographic analysis in millimeters of aluminum, and flow was also evaluated following ISO 6876. Solubility was assessed through mass loss (%) after 7 days of immersion in distilled water, hydroxyl and calcium ions release was measured by pH-meter and atomic absorption spectrophotometer, respectively. Push-out was tested at the universal test machine. The data were statistically compared using a 5% significance level. CEO 1 and CEO 2 showed higher setting times (p<0.05) and all sealers demonstrated radiopacity higher than 3mm/Al; however, lower radiopacity and flow values were detected in the presence of both experimental sealers when compared with BC and AHPB (p<0.05). No difference was found among all sealers for solubility (p>0.05). BC and CEO 2 had higher pH values at the initial time (p<0.05) while AHPB at the final time (p<0.05). In general, no significant difference between all sealers at all times was observed, except at 168h for CEO 1, which released more calcium ions than CEO 2 (p<0.05). BC and AHPB provided a superior push-out (p<0.05), and cohesive failures were predominant for all sealers. Both experimental sealers exhibited physicochemical properties similar to commercial endodontics sealers.