使用新索引简化临床重要创伤性牙损伤结果的登记。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ece Eden, Juan E Onetto, Eva Lauridsen, Lars Andersson
{"title":"使用新索引简化临床重要创伤性牙损伤结果的登记。","authors":"Ece Eden, Juan E Onetto, Eva Lauridsen, Lars Andersson","doi":"10.1111/edt.13086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) can result in complications that may manifest long after the initial injury. Long-term follow-up is essential. Registration systems must be easy to use. This study aimed to describe and validate a simple registration system for clinician-important TDI outcomes as an index.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>The clinical and radiological outcome findings were formulated with five digits in line with the Eden Baysal Dental Trauma Index. Twenty-five experts (n = 15 in a primary expert panel and n = 10 in a feedback panel) from seventeen countries participated in the validation process using the e-Delphi method. After two rounds to reach consensus, the second version of the proposed system was presented to the feedback group. The revised post-feedback version was re-evaluated by the primary experts. All experts commented freely and answered four questions on the system's use using a three-point Likert-scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The approved name of the proposed system is \"Eden Dental Trauma Outcome Index\". The first digit reports the success of the restoration, and the second digit reports the healing type of root fracture. Coding the first two digits changed from Roman to Arabic numerals after the first round. The third digit records the external root resorption type with capitalised first letters of the two words describing the type. The fourth digit reports the maturity of the apex with lowercase first letters. The fifth digit records pulp status with Arabic numerals. Codes for unclear situations and tooth loss were added to all digits in the final version. All experts in the primary panel and 83.3% in the feedback panel reported that the index is practical but needs experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After four validation rounds, the \"Eden Dental Trauma Outcome Index\" for reporting clinician-important outcomes was approved for face and content validity and external validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55180,"journal":{"name":"Dental Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplified Registration of Clinician-Important Traumatic Dental Injury Outcomes Using a New Index.\",\"authors\":\"Ece Eden, Juan E Onetto, Eva Lauridsen, Lars Andersson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/edt.13086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) can result in complications that may manifest long after the initial injury. Long-term follow-up is essential. Registration systems must be easy to use. This study aimed to describe and validate a simple registration system for clinician-important TDI outcomes as an index.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>The clinical and radiological outcome findings were formulated with five digits in line with the Eden Baysal Dental Trauma Index. Twenty-five experts (n = 15 in a primary expert panel and n = 10 in a feedback panel) from seventeen countries participated in the validation process using the e-Delphi method. After two rounds to reach consensus, the second version of the proposed system was presented to the feedback group. The revised post-feedback version was re-evaluated by the primary experts. All experts commented freely and answered four questions on the system's use using a three-point Likert-scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The approved name of the proposed system is \\\"Eden Dental Trauma Outcome Index\\\". The first digit reports the success of the restoration, and the second digit reports the healing type of root fracture. Coding the first two digits changed from Roman to Arabic numerals after the first round. The third digit records the external root resorption type with capitalised first letters of the two words describing the type. The fourth digit reports the maturity of the apex with lowercase first letters. The fifth digit records pulp status with Arabic numerals. Codes for unclear situations and tooth loss were added to all digits in the final version. All experts in the primary panel and 83.3% in the feedback panel reported that the index is practical but needs experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After four validation rounds, the \\\"Eden Dental Trauma Outcome Index\\\" for reporting clinician-important outcomes was approved for face and content validity and external validity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Traumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.13086\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.13086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:创伤性牙损伤(TDIs)可导致并发症,这些并发症可能在初始损伤后很长时间才出现。长期随访至关重要。注册系统必须易于使用。本研究旨在描述和验证一个简单的注册系统,将临床重要的TDI结果作为指标。材料/方法:根据Eden Baysal牙外伤指数制定五指临床和影像学结果。来自17个国家的25位专家(初级专家组n = 15,反馈专家组n = 10)使用e-德尔菲法参与了验证过程。经过两轮协商达成共识后,提议的系统的第二个版本被提交给反馈小组。初级专家对修订后的反馈版本进行了重新评估。所有专家都自由发表评论,并使用李克特量表回答了关于系统使用的四个问题。结果:提出的评价体系的核准名称为“伊甸牙外伤结局指数”。第一根手指报告修复成功,第二根手指报告根骨折愈合类型。第一轮后,前两位数字的编码由罗马数字改为阿拉伯数字。第三个数字记录外部根吸收类型,用两个描述该类型的单词的首字母大写。第四个数字用小写字母表示顶点的成熟度。第五个数字用阿拉伯数字记录纸浆状态。在最终版本中,所有数字都添加了不清楚情况和牙齿脱落的代码。初级专家组的所有专家和反馈专家组的83.3%的专家都认为该指数是实用的,但需要经验。结论:经过4轮验证,用于报告临床重要结果的“伊甸牙外伤结局指数”在外观效度、内容效度和外部效度上均获得批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simplified Registration of Clinician-Important Traumatic Dental Injury Outcomes Using a New Index.

Background/aims: Traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) can result in complications that may manifest long after the initial injury. Long-term follow-up is essential. Registration systems must be easy to use. This study aimed to describe and validate a simple registration system for clinician-important TDI outcomes as an index.

Materials/methods: The clinical and radiological outcome findings were formulated with five digits in line with the Eden Baysal Dental Trauma Index. Twenty-five experts (n = 15 in a primary expert panel and n = 10 in a feedback panel) from seventeen countries participated in the validation process using the e-Delphi method. After two rounds to reach consensus, the second version of the proposed system was presented to the feedback group. The revised post-feedback version was re-evaluated by the primary experts. All experts commented freely and answered four questions on the system's use using a three-point Likert-scale.

Results: The approved name of the proposed system is "Eden Dental Trauma Outcome Index". The first digit reports the success of the restoration, and the second digit reports the healing type of root fracture. Coding the first two digits changed from Roman to Arabic numerals after the first round. The third digit records the external root resorption type with capitalised first letters of the two words describing the type. The fourth digit reports the maturity of the apex with lowercase first letters. The fifth digit records pulp status with Arabic numerals. Codes for unclear situations and tooth loss were added to all digits in the final version. All experts in the primary panel and 83.3% in the feedback panel reported that the index is practical but needs experience.

Conclusion: After four validation rounds, the "Eden Dental Trauma Outcome Index" for reporting clinician-important outcomes was approved for face and content validity and external validity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Traumatology
Dental Traumatology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
32.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Traumatology is an international journal that aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in all areas related to adult and pediatric dental traumatology. This includes the following topics: - Epidemiology, Social Aspects, Education, Diagnostics - Esthetics / Prosthetics/ Restorative - Evidence Based Traumatology & Study Design - Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery/Transplant/Implant - Pediatrics and Orthodontics - Prevention and Sports Dentistry - Endodontics and Periodontal Aspects The journal"s aim is to promote communication among clinicians, educators, researchers, and others interested in the field of dental traumatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信