获得性脑损伤患者视力疾患筛查问卷(SVCq-abi)的有效性及临床适用性

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Vera Linde Dol, Arlette J van Sorge, Anselm B M Fuermaier, Wietske Rienstra, Radha Rambaran Mishre, Eline M E Will, Joost Heutink
{"title":"获得性脑损伤患者视力疾患筛查问卷(SVCq-abi)的有效性及临床适用性","authors":"Vera Linde Dol, Arlette J van Sorge, Anselm B M Fuermaier, Wietske Rienstra, Radha Rambaran Mishre, Eline M E Will, Joost Heutink","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2526648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 23-item Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire-acquired brain injury (SVCq-abi) was constructed to assess visual complaints in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). This cross-sectional study determines the validity and clinical applicability of the SVCq-abi in an ABI sample. The SVCq-abi was administered to 156 individuals with ABI (mean [SD], 58 [13] years, 36% female) following a neurorehabilitation programme (65% inpatient, 35% outpatient). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to determine the fit of a 5-factor model, and scale reliability was examined. Additionally, we assessed the distribution of responses on the SVCq-abi and the effect of key clinical variables on SVCq-abi subscale scores. CFA confirmed a 5-factor model with good fit statistics, except for the Standardized Root Mean-square Residual. Scale reliability ranged from weak to good. Most individuals (78%) reported at least one visual complaint. Outpatients reported more luminance-related and ocular discomfort complaints than inpatients. No significant effect was observed on subscale scores based on administration method, history of ophthalmic disease, time since ABI diagnosis, and age. CFA determined a 5-factor structure of the SVCq-abi, with sufficient scale. Individuals with ABI experienced a range of visual complaints. The SVCq-abi showed broad clinical applicability and may be a valuable tool for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and clinical applicability of the Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire-acquired brain injury (SVCq-abi) in individuals with acquired brain injury.\",\"authors\":\"Vera Linde Dol, Arlette J van Sorge, Anselm B M Fuermaier, Wietske Rienstra, Radha Rambaran Mishre, Eline M E Will, Joost Heutink\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09602011.2025.2526648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The 23-item Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire-acquired brain injury (SVCq-abi) was constructed to assess visual complaints in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). This cross-sectional study determines the validity and clinical applicability of the SVCq-abi in an ABI sample. The SVCq-abi was administered to 156 individuals with ABI (mean [SD], 58 [13] years, 36% female) following a neurorehabilitation programme (65% inpatient, 35% outpatient). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to determine the fit of a 5-factor model, and scale reliability was examined. Additionally, we assessed the distribution of responses on the SVCq-abi and the effect of key clinical variables on SVCq-abi subscale scores. CFA confirmed a 5-factor model with good fit statistics, except for the Standardized Root Mean-square Residual. Scale reliability ranged from weak to good. Most individuals (78%) reported at least one visual complaint. Outpatients reported more luminance-related and ocular discomfort complaints than inpatients. No significant effect was observed on subscale scores based on administration method, history of ophthalmic disease, time since ABI diagnosis, and age. CFA determined a 5-factor structure of the SVCq-abi, with sufficient scale. Individuals with ABI experienced a range of visual complaints. The SVCq-abi showed broad clinical applicability and may be a valuable tool for clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2526648\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2526648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为评估获得性脑损伤(ABI)患者的视觉主诉,设计了包含23个条目的《获得性脑损伤视力主诉筛查问卷》(SVCq-abi)。本横断面研究确定了SVCq-abi在ABI样本中的有效性和临床适用性。在神经康复计划(65%住院,35%门诊)后,对156名ABI患者(平均[SD], 58岁,36%女性)实施SVCq-abi。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)确定5因素模型的拟合,并检验量表信度。此外,我们评估了SVCq-abi的反应分布以及关键临床变量对SVCq-abi亚量表得分的影响。除了标准化均方根残差外,CFA证实了一个具有良好拟合统计量的5因素模型。量表的可靠性从弱到好。大多数人(78%)报告至少有一种视觉不适。与住院患者相比,门诊患者报告了更多与亮度相关的不适和眼部不适。基于给药方式、眼病史、ABI诊断时间和年龄的亚量表评分未观察到显著影响。CFA确定了SVCq-abi的5因子结构,具有足够的量表。ABI患者有一系列的视觉不适。SVCq-abi具有广泛的临床适用性,可能是临床实践中有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation and clinical applicability of the Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire-acquired brain injury (SVCq-abi) in individuals with acquired brain injury.

The 23-item Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire-acquired brain injury (SVCq-abi) was constructed to assess visual complaints in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). This cross-sectional study determines the validity and clinical applicability of the SVCq-abi in an ABI sample. The SVCq-abi was administered to 156 individuals with ABI (mean [SD], 58 [13] years, 36% female) following a neurorehabilitation programme (65% inpatient, 35% outpatient). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to determine the fit of a 5-factor model, and scale reliability was examined. Additionally, we assessed the distribution of responses on the SVCq-abi and the effect of key clinical variables on SVCq-abi subscale scores. CFA confirmed a 5-factor model with good fit statistics, except for the Standardized Root Mean-square Residual. Scale reliability ranged from weak to good. Most individuals (78%) reported at least one visual complaint. Outpatients reported more luminance-related and ocular discomfort complaints than inpatients. No significant effect was observed on subscale scores based on administration method, history of ophthalmic disease, time since ABI diagnosis, and age. CFA determined a 5-factor structure of the SVCq-abi, with sufficient scale. Individuals with ABI experienced a range of visual complaints. The SVCq-abi showed broad clinical applicability and may be a valuable tool for clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信