老年人的生活方式干预和药物负担:来自生活方式干预和老年人独立性(LIFE)和老年人肌肉减少症和身体虚弱的见解:多组分治疗策略(SPRINTT)试验。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Elena Levati, Maria Beatrice Zazzara, Angela Iurlaro, Emanuele Marzetti, Riccardo Calvani, Marco Pahor, Anna Picca, Matteo Tosato, Francesco Landi, Roberto Bernabei, Graziano Onder
{"title":"老年人的生活方式干预和药物负担:来自生活方式干预和老年人独立性(LIFE)和老年人肌肉减少症和身体虚弱的见解:多组分治疗策略(SPRINTT)试验。","authors":"Elena Levati, Maria Beatrice Zazzara, Angela Iurlaro, Emanuele Marzetti, Riccardo Calvani, Marco Pahor, Anna Picca, Matteo Tosato, Francesco Landi, Roberto Bernabei, Graziano Onder","doi":"10.1007/s41999-025-01266-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Polypharmacy is a growing public health problem and implementing strategies to reduce its prevalence is considered a research and clinical priority. Healthy lifestyle impacts the onset and progression of chronic conditions. Yet, there is limited understanding of how this effect influences medication use. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of lifestyle interventions on use of medications for treatment of common chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analyses from two randomized clinical trials: the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Study (LIFE) and the Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty IN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategies (SPRINTT) trials. LIFE study enrolled community-dwelling men and women aged 70 to 89 years old who were physically inactive and had reduced physical function recruited in eight centers in the United States. SPRINTT enrolled community-dwelling men and women aged 70 years or older with physical frailty and sarcopenia recruited in 16 clinical sites in Europe. Active intervention groups consisted of a physical activity program in LIFE and a multicomponent intervention based on physical activity with technological support and nutritional counselling/dietary intervention in SPRINTT. The main outcome measure was the change in cardiovascular, diabetes, mood and anxiety, and chronic pain medication use as measured by daily dose per day (DDD/day).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1519 LIFE participants (752 intervention vs 767 control group, mean age 78.9 years; 67.3% women) and 1,208 SPRINTT participants (602 intervention vs 606 control group, mean age 78.8 years; 72.8% women) were evaluated. For both studies, no significant difference was observed in the median number of DDDs at baseline and follow-up assessments for any of the medication classes considered. Longitudinal analysis performed using linear mixed models revealed no significant association between DDDs/day and lifestyle interventions, with the only exception of an increase in DDD/day of pain medications in the intervention group of SPRINTT (β = 0.16; CI 0.06-0.26 at 6 months; β = 0.12; CI 0.01-0.22 at 12 months; β = 0.12; CI 0.01-0.22 at 18 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lifestyle interventions did not significantly impact on burden of medications used to treat chronic conditions in frail older adults. This finding does not undermine the beneficial effects of these interventions on health outcomes, but highlights the need for specifically designed trials to determine their effect on reducing polypharmacy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01072500 (LIFE) and NCT02582138 (SPRINTT).</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lifestyle interventions and medication burden in older adults: insights from the Lifestyle Intervention and Independence for Elders (LIFE) and the Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty iN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategies (SPRINTT) trials.\",\"authors\":\"Elena Levati, Maria Beatrice Zazzara, Angela Iurlaro, Emanuele Marzetti, Riccardo Calvani, Marco Pahor, Anna Picca, Matteo Tosato, Francesco Landi, Roberto Bernabei, Graziano Onder\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41999-025-01266-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Polypharmacy is a growing public health problem and implementing strategies to reduce its prevalence is considered a research and clinical priority. Healthy lifestyle impacts the onset and progression of chronic conditions. Yet, there is limited understanding of how this effect influences medication use. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of lifestyle interventions on use of medications for treatment of common chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analyses from two randomized clinical trials: the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Study (LIFE) and the Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty IN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategies (SPRINTT) trials. LIFE study enrolled community-dwelling men and women aged 70 to 89 years old who were physically inactive and had reduced physical function recruited in eight centers in the United States. SPRINTT enrolled community-dwelling men and women aged 70 years or older with physical frailty and sarcopenia recruited in 16 clinical sites in Europe. Active intervention groups consisted of a physical activity program in LIFE and a multicomponent intervention based on physical activity with technological support and nutritional counselling/dietary intervention in SPRINTT. The main outcome measure was the change in cardiovascular, diabetes, mood and anxiety, and chronic pain medication use as measured by daily dose per day (DDD/day).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1519 LIFE participants (752 intervention vs 767 control group, mean age 78.9 years; 67.3% women) and 1,208 SPRINTT participants (602 intervention vs 606 control group, mean age 78.8 years; 72.8% women) were evaluated. For both studies, no significant difference was observed in the median number of DDDs at baseline and follow-up assessments for any of the medication classes considered. Longitudinal analysis performed using linear mixed models revealed no significant association between DDDs/day and lifestyle interventions, with the only exception of an increase in DDD/day of pain medications in the intervention group of SPRINTT (β = 0.16; CI 0.06-0.26 at 6 months; β = 0.12; CI 0.01-0.22 at 12 months; β = 0.12; CI 0.01-0.22 at 18 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lifestyle interventions did not significantly impact on burden of medications used to treat chronic conditions in frail older adults. This finding does not undermine the beneficial effects of these interventions on health outcomes, but highlights the need for specifically designed trials to determine their effect on reducing polypharmacy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01072500 (LIFE) and NCT02582138 (SPRINTT).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Geriatric Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Geriatric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01266-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01266-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多种用药是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,实施降低其流行率的战略被认为是研究和临床的优先事项。健康的生活方式影响慢性疾病的发生和发展。然而,人们对这种效应如何影响药物使用的理解有限。该研究的目的是评估生活方式干预对治疗常见慢性疾病的药物使用的影响。方法:我们对两项随机临床试验进行了二次分析:老年人生活方式干预和独立性研究(LIFE)和老年人肌肉减少症和身体虚弱:多组分治疗策略(SPRINTT)试验。LIFE研究招募了来自美国8个研究中心的年龄在70 - 89岁之间的社区居民,他们缺乏运动,身体机能下降。SPRINTT在欧洲的16个临床地点招募了年龄在70岁或以上、身体虚弱和肌肉减少症的社区居住男性和女性。积极干预组包括LIFE中的体育活动计划和SPRINTT中基于体育活动的多成分干预,包括技术支持和营养咨询/饮食干预。主要结局指标是心血管、糖尿病、情绪和焦虑的变化,以及以每日剂量(DDD/天)衡量的慢性疼痛药物使用情况。结果:共有1519名LIFE参与者(干预组752人,对照组767人),平均年龄78.9岁;67.3%女性)和1208名SPRINTT参与者(602名干预组vs 606名对照组,平均年龄78.8岁;72.8%为女性)。在这两项研究中,所考虑的任何药物类别在基线和随访评估时的DDDs中位数均未观察到显著差异。使用线性混合模型进行的纵向分析显示,除了SPRINTT干预组止痛药的DDD/day增加外,生活方式干预与DDD/day之间没有显著关联(β = 0.16;6个月时CI 0.06-0.26;β = 0.12;12个月时CI 0.01-0.22;β = 0.12;18个月时CI 0.01-0.22)。结论:生活方式干预对体弱老年人治疗慢性疾病的药物负担没有显著影响。这一发现并没有削弱这些干预措施对健康结果的有益影响,但强调了需要专门设计的试验来确定它们对减少多药的影响。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01072500 (LIFE)和NCT02582138 (SPRINTT)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lifestyle interventions and medication burden in older adults: insights from the Lifestyle Intervention and Independence for Elders (LIFE) and the Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty iN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategies (SPRINTT) trials.

Purpose: Polypharmacy is a growing public health problem and implementing strategies to reduce its prevalence is considered a research and clinical priority. Healthy lifestyle impacts the onset and progression of chronic conditions. Yet, there is limited understanding of how this effect influences medication use. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of lifestyle interventions on use of medications for treatment of common chronic conditions.

Methods: We performed a secondary analyses from two randomized clinical trials: the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Study (LIFE) and the Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty IN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategies (SPRINTT) trials. LIFE study enrolled community-dwelling men and women aged 70 to 89 years old who were physically inactive and had reduced physical function recruited in eight centers in the United States. SPRINTT enrolled community-dwelling men and women aged 70 years or older with physical frailty and sarcopenia recruited in 16 clinical sites in Europe. Active intervention groups consisted of a physical activity program in LIFE and a multicomponent intervention based on physical activity with technological support and nutritional counselling/dietary intervention in SPRINTT. The main outcome measure was the change in cardiovascular, diabetes, mood and anxiety, and chronic pain medication use as measured by daily dose per day (DDD/day).

Results: A total of 1519 LIFE participants (752 intervention vs 767 control group, mean age 78.9 years; 67.3% women) and 1,208 SPRINTT participants (602 intervention vs 606 control group, mean age 78.8 years; 72.8% women) were evaluated. For both studies, no significant difference was observed in the median number of DDDs at baseline and follow-up assessments for any of the medication classes considered. Longitudinal analysis performed using linear mixed models revealed no significant association between DDDs/day and lifestyle interventions, with the only exception of an increase in DDD/day of pain medications in the intervention group of SPRINTT (β = 0.16; CI 0.06-0.26 at 6 months; β = 0.12; CI 0.01-0.22 at 12 months; β = 0.12; CI 0.01-0.22 at 18 months).

Conclusion: Lifestyle interventions did not significantly impact on burden of medications used to treat chronic conditions in frail older adults. This finding does not undermine the beneficial effects of these interventions on health outcomes, but highlights the need for specifically designed trials to determine their effect on reducing polypharmacy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01072500 (LIFE) and NCT02582138 (SPRINTT).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信