规范助产士:权力、公共卫生和传统助产士在西弗吉尼亚州的衰落,1881-1929。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maternal and Child Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI:10.1007/s10995-025-04142-2
Timothy De Ver Dye
{"title":"规范助产士:权力、公共卫生和传统助产士在西弗吉尼亚州的衰落,1881-1929。","authors":"Timothy De Ver Dye","doi":"10.1007/s10995-025-04142-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This historical policy analysis centers on how early maternal and child health (MCH) efforts affected the practice and decline of traditional midwifery in West Virginia. From the emergence of official government action in MCH with the establishment of the West Virginia Board of Health in 1881, through the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity and Infancy Act of the 1920s-the nation's first large-scale attempt at making the provision and improvement of MCH issues a national priority-West Virginia transformed childbirth practices by increasingly regulating, professionalizing, and ultimately marginalizing traditional midwives. As the West Virginia case shows, the intersection of state and federal public policy and professional power attempted to improve maternal and infant outcomes, which often led to policies reducing autonomy and numbers of midwives. The West Virginia experience reflects wider US trends in the early twentieth century, showing that public health programs and physician-led campaigns combined to reform who was authorized to attend births. West Virginia's history exemplifies the dual nature of MCH legislation in the early 1900s, bringing much-needed resources and attention to maternal and infant health, but accelerating the decline of midwifery through regulatory oversight and the medicalization of birth, frequently leaving communities without skilled expertise in pregnancy-related care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1087-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating the Midwife: Power, Public Health, and the Decline of Traditional Midwifery in West Virginia, 1881-1929.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy De Ver Dye\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10995-025-04142-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This historical policy analysis centers on how early maternal and child health (MCH) efforts affected the practice and decline of traditional midwifery in West Virginia. From the emergence of official government action in MCH with the establishment of the West Virginia Board of Health in 1881, through the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity and Infancy Act of the 1920s-the nation's first large-scale attempt at making the provision and improvement of MCH issues a national priority-West Virginia transformed childbirth practices by increasingly regulating, professionalizing, and ultimately marginalizing traditional midwives. As the West Virginia case shows, the intersection of state and federal public policy and professional power attempted to improve maternal and infant outcomes, which often led to policies reducing autonomy and numbers of midwives. The West Virginia experience reflects wider US trends in the early twentieth century, showing that public health programs and physician-led campaigns combined to reform who was authorized to attend births. West Virginia's history exemplifies the dual nature of MCH legislation in the early 1900s, bringing much-needed resources and attention to maternal and infant health, but accelerating the decline of midwifery through regulatory oversight and the medicalization of birth, frequently leaving communities without skilled expertise in pregnancy-related care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1087-1102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04142-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04142-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一历史政策分析的中心是早期妇幼保健(MCH)的努力如何影响西弗吉尼亚州传统助产的实践和衰落。从1881年西弗吉尼亚州健康委员会的成立,官方政府在妇幼保健方面的行动开始,到20世纪20年代的联邦谢泼德-汤纳母婴法案——国家第一次大规模的尝试,使妇幼保健问题的提供和改进成为国家的优先事项——西弗吉尼亚州通过日益规范、专业化和最终边缘化传统助产士,改变了分娩实践。正如西弗吉尼亚州的案例所显示的那样,州和联邦公共政策与专业权力的交叉试图改善孕产妇和婴儿的结果,这往往导致政策减少了助产士的自主权和数量。西弗吉尼亚州的经验反映了20世纪初美国更广泛的趋势,表明公共卫生项目和医生主导的运动结合起来改革了谁有权参加分娩。西弗吉尼亚州的历史体现了20世纪初妇幼保健立法的双重性质,为母婴健康带来了急需的资源和关注,但通过监管监督和分娩医疗化加速了助产的衰落,经常使社区缺乏与怀孕有关的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulating the Midwife: Power, Public Health, and the Decline of Traditional Midwifery in West Virginia, 1881-1929.

This historical policy analysis centers on how early maternal and child health (MCH) efforts affected the practice and decline of traditional midwifery in West Virginia. From the emergence of official government action in MCH with the establishment of the West Virginia Board of Health in 1881, through the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity and Infancy Act of the 1920s-the nation's first large-scale attempt at making the provision and improvement of MCH issues a national priority-West Virginia transformed childbirth practices by increasingly regulating, professionalizing, and ultimately marginalizing traditional midwives. As the West Virginia case shows, the intersection of state and federal public policy and professional power attempted to improve maternal and infant outcomes, which often led to policies reducing autonomy and numbers of midwives. The West Virginia experience reflects wider US trends in the early twentieth century, showing that public health programs and physician-led campaigns combined to reform who was authorized to attend births. West Virginia's history exemplifies the dual nature of MCH legislation in the early 1900s, bringing much-needed resources and attention to maternal and infant health, but accelerating the decline of midwifery through regulatory oversight and the medicalization of birth, frequently leaving communities without skilled expertise in pregnancy-related care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信