{"title":"利用锥束计算机断层评估成人矢状骨差异与上颌窦容积之间的关系。","authors":"Tareq Azizia, Kinda Sultan, Mohammad Younis Hajeer, Ziad Mohamad Alhafi, Tasneem Sukari","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-10856-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to assess maxillary sinus volume and related measurements in different sagittal skeletal classes. Sixty CBCT images of adult patients aged between 18 and 25 years were collected and divided into three groups based on the ANB angle value: Class I (ANB = 0-4 degrees), Class II (ANB > 4 degrees), and Class III (ANB < 0 degrees). Maxillary sinus volume, surface area, width, depth, and height measurements were performed using Mimics Research TM software version 21.0. The maxillary sinus measurements were compared among the three skeletal groups. A total of 60 patients, with a mean age of 21.10 ± 2.00 years (ranging from 18 to 25 years), met the inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in maxillary sinus measurements between the right and left sides (P > 0.05). Therefore, the mean value of bilateral measurements was used for subsequent analysis. No significant differences were observed in maxillary sinus volume, surface area, or height among the three skeletal classes (P > 0.05). However, the Class I group exhibited significantly greater maxillary sinus width and depth compared to Class III (P < 0.05).</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"25689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the relationship between sagittal skeletal discrepancies and maxillary sinus volume in adults using cone-beam computed tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Tareq Azizia, Kinda Sultan, Mohammad Younis Hajeer, Ziad Mohamad Alhafi, Tasneem Sukari\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-10856-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to assess maxillary sinus volume and related measurements in different sagittal skeletal classes. Sixty CBCT images of adult patients aged between 18 and 25 years were collected and divided into three groups based on the ANB angle value: Class I (ANB = 0-4 degrees), Class II (ANB > 4 degrees), and Class III (ANB < 0 degrees). Maxillary sinus volume, surface area, width, depth, and height measurements were performed using Mimics Research TM software version 21.0. The maxillary sinus measurements were compared among the three skeletal groups. A total of 60 patients, with a mean age of 21.10 ± 2.00 years (ranging from 18 to 25 years), met the inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in maxillary sinus measurements between the right and left sides (P > 0.05). Therefore, the mean value of bilateral measurements was used for subsequent analysis. No significant differences were observed in maxillary sinus volume, surface area, or height among the three skeletal classes (P > 0.05). However, the Class I group exhibited significantly greater maxillary sinus width and depth compared to Class III (P < 0.05).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"25689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264144/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10856-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10856-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the relationship between sagittal skeletal discrepancies and maxillary sinus volume in adults using cone-beam computed tomography.
This study aimed to use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to assess maxillary sinus volume and related measurements in different sagittal skeletal classes. Sixty CBCT images of adult patients aged between 18 and 25 years were collected and divided into three groups based on the ANB angle value: Class I (ANB = 0-4 degrees), Class II (ANB > 4 degrees), and Class III (ANB < 0 degrees). Maxillary sinus volume, surface area, width, depth, and height measurements were performed using Mimics Research TM software version 21.0. The maxillary sinus measurements were compared among the three skeletal groups. A total of 60 patients, with a mean age of 21.10 ± 2.00 years (ranging from 18 to 25 years), met the inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in maxillary sinus measurements between the right and left sides (P > 0.05). Therefore, the mean value of bilateral measurements was used for subsequent analysis. No significant differences were observed in maxillary sinus volume, surface area, or height among the three skeletal classes (P > 0.05). However, the Class I group exhibited significantly greater maxillary sinus width and depth compared to Class III (P < 0.05).
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.