家庭犬类ADHD诊断系统的研制。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Barbara Csibra, Nóra Bunford, Márta Gácsi
{"title":"家庭犬类ADHD诊断系统的研制。","authors":"Barbara Csibra, Nóra Bunford, Márta Gácsi","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-09988-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dogs exhibit natural variability in inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity traits, sometimes with extreme manifestations resembling to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms in humans. Using human-standard diagnostic methods, we developed a comprehensive approach for supporting diagnosing ADHD in dogs (N = 1872) based on a validated questionnaire that consists of two parts: a symptom section that provides factor scores for three areas (inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity), and a functionality section that evaluates the extent to which these symptoms cause functional impairments. Based on the functionality section, we classified dogs as functionally impaired if they showed impairment in at least 4 out of the 7 questions of at least one area (n = 116; 6.2% of the sample). Then, we projected the impaired-non-impaired categories on the ADHD total scores of the symptom section to establish potential cutoff values. The ROC curve analysis resulted in an excellent AUC value (0.861). A cutoff score of 26 was established based on well-defined sensitivity and specificity trade-offs. Finally, we applied the combined thresholds of the two parts of the questionnaire to identify dogs at-risk vs. non-at-risk for ADHD (n = 79; 4.22% of the sample). We offer the first replicable method to screen dogs with suspected ADHD. A final diagnosis could be set after dog-owner pairs participate in relevant behavioural tests and an expert consultation. Allowing for comparisons between ADHD vs. typical groups of family dogs, our method not only facilitates the improvement of the wellbeing of at-risk dogs, but also makes it more feasible to use dogs as a natural model species for studying ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"25671"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a human analogue ADHD diagnostic system for family dogs.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Csibra, Nóra Bunford, Márta Gácsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-09988-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dogs exhibit natural variability in inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity traits, sometimes with extreme manifestations resembling to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms in humans. Using human-standard diagnostic methods, we developed a comprehensive approach for supporting diagnosing ADHD in dogs (N = 1872) based on a validated questionnaire that consists of two parts: a symptom section that provides factor scores for three areas (inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity), and a functionality section that evaluates the extent to which these symptoms cause functional impairments. Based on the functionality section, we classified dogs as functionally impaired if they showed impairment in at least 4 out of the 7 questions of at least one area (n = 116; 6.2% of the sample). Then, we projected the impaired-non-impaired categories on the ADHD total scores of the symptom section to establish potential cutoff values. The ROC curve analysis resulted in an excellent AUC value (0.861). A cutoff score of 26 was established based on well-defined sensitivity and specificity trade-offs. Finally, we applied the combined thresholds of the two parts of the questionnaire to identify dogs at-risk vs. non-at-risk for ADHD (n = 79; 4.22% of the sample). We offer the first replicable method to screen dogs with suspected ADHD. A final diagnosis could be set after dog-owner pairs participate in relevant behavioural tests and an expert consultation. Allowing for comparisons between ADHD vs. typical groups of family dogs, our method not only facilitates the improvement of the wellbeing of at-risk dogs, but also makes it more feasible to use dogs as a natural model species for studying ADHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"25671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263975/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09988-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09988-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

狗在注意力不集中、多动和冲动方面表现出自然的可变性,有时表现得极端类似于人类的注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)症状。使用人类标准的诊断方法,我们开发了一种全面的方法来支持诊断狗的多动症(N = 1872),该方法基于一份经过验证的问卷,该问卷由两部分组成:症状部分提供三个方面(注意力不集中、多动和冲动)的因素评分,以及功能部分评估这些症状导致功能障碍的程度。根据功能部分,如果狗在至少一个区域的7个问题中至少有4个问题表现出损伤,我们将狗分类为功能受损(n = 116;样本的6.2%)。然后,我们将受损-非受损类别投射到ADHD症状部分的总分上,以建立潜在的临界值。ROC曲线分析结果显示AUC值极佳(0.861)。根据定义明确的敏感性和特异性权衡,建立了26分的临界值。最后,我们应用问卷两部分的联合阈值来识别有ADHD风险与无ADHD风险的狗(n = 79;4.22%的样本)。我们提供了第一个可复制的方法来筛选患有疑似多动症的狗。在狗主人夫妇参与相关行为测试和专家咨询后,最终诊断可能会确定。通过比较ADHD与典型家庭犬群之间的差异,我们的方法不仅有助于改善高危犬的健康状况,而且使犬类作为研究ADHD的天然模型物种更加可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of a human analogue ADHD diagnostic system for family dogs.

Development of a human analogue ADHD diagnostic system for family dogs.

Development of a human analogue ADHD diagnostic system for family dogs.

Development of a human analogue ADHD diagnostic system for family dogs.

Dogs exhibit natural variability in inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity traits, sometimes with extreme manifestations resembling to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms in humans. Using human-standard diagnostic methods, we developed a comprehensive approach for supporting diagnosing ADHD in dogs (N = 1872) based on a validated questionnaire that consists of two parts: a symptom section that provides factor scores for three areas (inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity), and a functionality section that evaluates the extent to which these symptoms cause functional impairments. Based on the functionality section, we classified dogs as functionally impaired if they showed impairment in at least 4 out of the 7 questions of at least one area (n = 116; 6.2% of the sample). Then, we projected the impaired-non-impaired categories on the ADHD total scores of the symptom section to establish potential cutoff values. The ROC curve analysis resulted in an excellent AUC value (0.861). A cutoff score of 26 was established based on well-defined sensitivity and specificity trade-offs. Finally, we applied the combined thresholds of the two parts of the questionnaire to identify dogs at-risk vs. non-at-risk for ADHD (n = 79; 4.22% of the sample). We offer the first replicable method to screen dogs with suspected ADHD. A final diagnosis could be set after dog-owner pairs participate in relevant behavioural tests and an expert consultation. Allowing for comparisons between ADHD vs. typical groups of family dogs, our method not only facilitates the improvement of the wellbeing of at-risk dogs, but also makes it more feasible to use dogs as a natural model species for studying ADHD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信