{"title":"家庭犬类ADHD诊断系统的研制。","authors":"Barbara Csibra, Nóra Bunford, Márta Gácsi","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-09988-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dogs exhibit natural variability in inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity traits, sometimes with extreme manifestations resembling to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms in humans. Using human-standard diagnostic methods, we developed a comprehensive approach for supporting diagnosing ADHD in dogs (N = 1872) based on a validated questionnaire that consists of two parts: a symptom section that provides factor scores for three areas (inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity), and a functionality section that evaluates the extent to which these symptoms cause functional impairments. Based on the functionality section, we classified dogs as functionally impaired if they showed impairment in at least 4 out of the 7 questions of at least one area (n = 116; 6.2% of the sample). Then, we projected the impaired-non-impaired categories on the ADHD total scores of the symptom section to establish potential cutoff values. The ROC curve analysis resulted in an excellent AUC value (0.861). A cutoff score of 26 was established based on well-defined sensitivity and specificity trade-offs. Finally, we applied the combined thresholds of the two parts of the questionnaire to identify dogs at-risk vs. non-at-risk for ADHD (n = 79; 4.22% of the sample). We offer the first replicable method to screen dogs with suspected ADHD. A final diagnosis could be set after dog-owner pairs participate in relevant behavioural tests and an expert consultation. Allowing for comparisons between ADHD vs. typical groups of family dogs, our method not only facilitates the improvement of the wellbeing of at-risk dogs, but also makes it more feasible to use dogs as a natural model species for studying ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"25671"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a human analogue ADHD diagnostic system for family dogs.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Csibra, Nóra Bunford, Márta Gácsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-09988-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dogs exhibit natural variability in inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity traits, sometimes with extreme manifestations resembling to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms in humans. Using human-standard diagnostic methods, we developed a comprehensive approach for supporting diagnosing ADHD in dogs (N = 1872) based on a validated questionnaire that consists of two parts: a symptom section that provides factor scores for three areas (inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity), and a functionality section that evaluates the extent to which these symptoms cause functional impairments. Based on the functionality section, we classified dogs as functionally impaired if they showed impairment in at least 4 out of the 7 questions of at least one area (n = 116; 6.2% of the sample). Then, we projected the impaired-non-impaired categories on the ADHD total scores of the symptom section to establish potential cutoff values. The ROC curve analysis resulted in an excellent AUC value (0.861). A cutoff score of 26 was established based on well-defined sensitivity and specificity trade-offs. Finally, we applied the combined thresholds of the two parts of the questionnaire to identify dogs at-risk vs. non-at-risk for ADHD (n = 79; 4.22% of the sample). We offer the first replicable method to screen dogs with suspected ADHD. A final diagnosis could be set after dog-owner pairs participate in relevant behavioural tests and an expert consultation. Allowing for comparisons between ADHD vs. typical groups of family dogs, our method not only facilitates the improvement of the wellbeing of at-risk dogs, but also makes it more feasible to use dogs as a natural model species for studying ADHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"25671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263975/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09988-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09988-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a human analogue ADHD diagnostic system for family dogs.
Dogs exhibit natural variability in inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity traits, sometimes with extreme manifestations resembling to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms in humans. Using human-standard diagnostic methods, we developed a comprehensive approach for supporting diagnosing ADHD in dogs (N = 1872) based on a validated questionnaire that consists of two parts: a symptom section that provides factor scores for three areas (inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity), and a functionality section that evaluates the extent to which these symptoms cause functional impairments. Based on the functionality section, we classified dogs as functionally impaired if they showed impairment in at least 4 out of the 7 questions of at least one area (n = 116; 6.2% of the sample). Then, we projected the impaired-non-impaired categories on the ADHD total scores of the symptom section to establish potential cutoff values. The ROC curve analysis resulted in an excellent AUC value (0.861). A cutoff score of 26 was established based on well-defined sensitivity and specificity trade-offs. Finally, we applied the combined thresholds of the two parts of the questionnaire to identify dogs at-risk vs. non-at-risk for ADHD (n = 79; 4.22% of the sample). We offer the first replicable method to screen dogs with suspected ADHD. A final diagnosis could be set after dog-owner pairs participate in relevant behavioural tests and an expert consultation. Allowing for comparisons between ADHD vs. typical groups of family dogs, our method not only facilitates the improvement of the wellbeing of at-risk dogs, but also makes it more feasible to use dogs as a natural model species for studying ADHD.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.