骨质疏松患者的决策辅助:一项范围综述。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0328230
Yanyu Fang, Qin Jia, Yaqin Dai, Siqi Li
{"title":"骨质疏松患者的决策辅助:一项范围综述。","authors":"Yanyu Fang, Qin Jia, Yaqin Dai, Siqi Li","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0328230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although various methods exist for osteoporosis prevention, most patients fail to receive optimal treatment due to information asymmetry between physicians and patients, as well as limited consultation time. Current literatures suggest that decision aids can support clinical decision-making by improving patients' risk perception and treatment acceptance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review described the use and effectiveness of decision aids in clinical decision-making among individuals with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will include studies conducted in various countries that focus on decision-aiding interventions for people with osteoporosis in different settings and are published in English or Chinese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database were searched. The search timeframe was from the establishment of the database to June 30, 2024. Studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be eligible for selection. The process of selecting eligible studies will then be summarized on a PRISMA-ScR chart. Collated in data-extraction tables will be authorship information, publication date, country, study site, sample information, study type, intervention form, content elements, application scope, and outcome indicators. The content elements, application scope, and outcome indicators will be analyzed using a thematic analysis and summarized using a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With strong efficacy and viability, DA greatly enhances patients' decision-making experience and decision quality. In order to provide patients with osteoporosis with high-quality decision-making support, it will be necessary to conduct large-scale, randomized controlled studies in the future with the goal of guaranteeing homogeneous interventions, expand the scope and meaning of the application of DA in osteoporosis, improve professional support during the decision-making process, create scientific and useful decision-making aids, and take specific actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0328230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12262833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision aids in patients with osteoporosis: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Yanyu Fang, Qin Jia, Yaqin Dai, Siqi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0328230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although various methods exist for osteoporosis prevention, most patients fail to receive optimal treatment due to information asymmetry between physicians and patients, as well as limited consultation time. Current literatures suggest that decision aids can support clinical decision-making by improving patients' risk perception and treatment acceptance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review described the use and effectiveness of decision aids in clinical decision-making among individuals with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will include studies conducted in various countries that focus on decision-aiding interventions for people with osteoporosis in different settings and are published in English or Chinese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database were searched. The search timeframe was from the establishment of the database to June 30, 2024. Studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be eligible for selection. The process of selecting eligible studies will then be summarized on a PRISMA-ScR chart. Collated in data-extraction tables will be authorship information, publication date, country, study site, sample information, study type, intervention form, content elements, application scope, and outcome indicators. The content elements, application scope, and outcome indicators will be analyzed using a thematic analysis and summarized using a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With strong efficacy and viability, DA greatly enhances patients' decision-making experience and decision quality. In order to provide patients with osteoporosis with high-quality decision-making support, it will be necessary to conduct large-scale, randomized controlled studies in the future with the goal of guaranteeing homogeneous interventions, expand the scope and meaning of the application of DA in osteoporosis, improve professional support during the decision-making process, create scientific and useful decision-making aids, and take specific actions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"e0328230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12262833/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328230\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328230","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:虽然骨质疏松症的预防方法多种多样,但由于医患之间的信息不对称以及就诊时间有限,大多数患者未能得到最佳治疗。目前的文献表明,决策辅助工具可以通过提高患者的风险认知和治疗接受度来支持临床决策。目的:本综述描述了骨质疏松症患者临床决策辅助工具的使用和有效性。纳入标准:本综述将包括在不同国家进行的研究,这些研究侧重于骨质疏松症患者在不同环境下的决策辅助干预措施,并以英文或中文发表。方法:检索PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知识网、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库。搜索时间范围为数据库建立至2024年6月30日。符合纳入标准的研究将有资格入选。然后在PRISMA-ScR图表上总结选择合格研究的过程。数据提取表将整理作者信息、出版日期、国家、研究地点、样本信息、研究类型、干预形式、内容要素、应用范围和结果指标。内容要素、应用范围和成果指标将采用专题分析进行分析,并采用叙述性摘要进行总结。结论:DA具有较强的疗效和生存力,可显著提高患者的决策体验和决策质量。为了给骨质疏松症患者提供高质量的决策支持,未来需要开展大规模的随机对照研究,以保证干预的同质性,扩大DA在骨质疏松症中的应用范围和意义,提高决策过程中的专业支持,创造科学有用的决策辅助工具,并采取具体行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Decision aids in patients with osteoporosis: A scoping review.

Decision aids in patients with osteoporosis: A scoping review.

Decision aids in patients with osteoporosis: A scoping review.

Introduction: Although various methods exist for osteoporosis prevention, most patients fail to receive optimal treatment due to information asymmetry between physicians and patients, as well as limited consultation time. Current literatures suggest that decision aids can support clinical decision-making by improving patients' risk perception and treatment acceptance.

Objective: This scoping review described the use and effectiveness of decision aids in clinical decision-making among individuals with osteoporosis.

Inclusion criteria: The review will include studies conducted in various countries that focus on decision-aiding interventions for people with osteoporosis in different settings and are published in English or Chinese.

Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database were searched. The search timeframe was from the establishment of the database to June 30, 2024. Studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be eligible for selection. The process of selecting eligible studies will then be summarized on a PRISMA-ScR chart. Collated in data-extraction tables will be authorship information, publication date, country, study site, sample information, study type, intervention form, content elements, application scope, and outcome indicators. The content elements, application scope, and outcome indicators will be analyzed using a thematic analysis and summarized using a narrative summary.

Conclusion: With strong efficacy and viability, DA greatly enhances patients' decision-making experience and decision quality. In order to provide patients with osteoporosis with high-quality decision-making support, it will be necessary to conduct large-scale, randomized controlled studies in the future with the goal of guaranteeing homogeneous interventions, expand the scope and meaning of the application of DA in osteoporosis, improve professional support during the decision-making process, create scientific and useful decision-making aids, and take specific actions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信