Thomas A Lanz, Klemens Ruprecht, Christopher J Somps, Jens C Göpfert, Tony Kam-Thong, Fetene Tekle, Kelly A Fader, Viviana A Carcamo Yañez, Volker Meyer, Sabine Friedrich, Katerina Vlasakova, Carolin Otto, Sara A Paciga, Sophia L Samodelov, Shashi K Ramaiah
{"title":"正常健康志愿者血清神经丝光水平的纵向评价:定义一个关注阈值。","authors":"Thomas A Lanz, Klemens Ruprecht, Christopher J Somps, Jens C Göpfert, Tony Kam-Thong, Fetene Tekle, Kelly A Fader, Viviana A Carcamo Yañez, Volker Meyer, Sabine Friedrich, Katerina Vlasakova, Carolin Otto, Sara A Paciga, Sophia L Samodelov, Shashi K Ramaiah","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13246-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurofilament light (NfL) is a neuron-specific protein integral to neuronal cytoskeletons. Upon damage to the central or peripheral nervous system (NS), NfL is released into cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Elevated serum or plasma NfL levels have been reported in a variety of diseases and NS injury states. However, although intraindividual longitudinal NfL changes may be more meaningful than NfL measurements at a single timepoint, data on the longitudinal variation of NfL in normal healthy volunteers (NHV) are scarce. We investigated normal variation in NHV serum NfL and estimate an upper limit of normal (ULN) of NfL variation in longitudinal samples. An initial cross-sectional screening in sera from 270 NHV using a 4-plex assay detected NfL in 99.6% and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in 100%, while Tau (67.4%), and Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1, 4.1%) were less frequently detectable. An age-dependent increase was found in NfL (2.36% per year) and GFAP (1.18% per year). Longitudinal evaluation of NfL was then conducted in a separate cohort of 80 NHV at baseline, day 14 (range 11-17), and day 28 (range 26-56). A 1.64-fold increase from baseline in serum NfL was calculated as the ULN. Putting this threshold into context with published reports on NfL across a large variety of injury and disease settings, the 1.64-fold threshold is well positioned to discriminate between healthy and NS injury. Altogether, these findings provide a framework for longitudinal monitoring of serum NfL as a biomarker for neuronal damage in multiple contexts of use, including drug-induced injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 8","pages":"512"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal evaluation of serum neurofilament light levels in normal healthy volunteers: defining a threshold of concern.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas A Lanz, Klemens Ruprecht, Christopher J Somps, Jens C Göpfert, Tony Kam-Thong, Fetene Tekle, Kelly A Fader, Viviana A Carcamo Yañez, Volker Meyer, Sabine Friedrich, Katerina Vlasakova, Carolin Otto, Sara A Paciga, Sophia L Samodelov, Shashi K Ramaiah\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13246-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neurofilament light (NfL) is a neuron-specific protein integral to neuronal cytoskeletons. Upon damage to the central or peripheral nervous system (NS), NfL is released into cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Elevated serum or plasma NfL levels have been reported in a variety of diseases and NS injury states. However, although intraindividual longitudinal NfL changes may be more meaningful than NfL measurements at a single timepoint, data on the longitudinal variation of NfL in normal healthy volunteers (NHV) are scarce. We investigated normal variation in NHV serum NfL and estimate an upper limit of normal (ULN) of NfL variation in longitudinal samples. An initial cross-sectional screening in sera from 270 NHV using a 4-plex assay detected NfL in 99.6% and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in 100%, while Tau (67.4%), and Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1, 4.1%) were less frequently detectable. An age-dependent increase was found in NfL (2.36% per year) and GFAP (1.18% per year). Longitudinal evaluation of NfL was then conducted in a separate cohort of 80 NHV at baseline, day 14 (range 11-17), and day 28 (range 26-56). A 1.64-fold increase from baseline in serum NfL was calculated as the ULN. Putting this threshold into context with published reports on NfL across a large variety of injury and disease settings, the 1.64-fold threshold is well positioned to discriminate between healthy and NS injury. Altogether, these findings provide a framework for longitudinal monitoring of serum NfL as a biomarker for neuronal damage in multiple contexts of use, including drug-induced injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 8\",\"pages\":\"512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263756/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13246-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13246-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Longitudinal evaluation of serum neurofilament light levels in normal healthy volunteers: defining a threshold of concern.
Neurofilament light (NfL) is a neuron-specific protein integral to neuronal cytoskeletons. Upon damage to the central or peripheral nervous system (NS), NfL is released into cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Elevated serum or plasma NfL levels have been reported in a variety of diseases and NS injury states. However, although intraindividual longitudinal NfL changes may be more meaningful than NfL measurements at a single timepoint, data on the longitudinal variation of NfL in normal healthy volunteers (NHV) are scarce. We investigated normal variation in NHV serum NfL and estimate an upper limit of normal (ULN) of NfL variation in longitudinal samples. An initial cross-sectional screening in sera from 270 NHV using a 4-plex assay detected NfL in 99.6% and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in 100%, while Tau (67.4%), and Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1, 4.1%) were less frequently detectable. An age-dependent increase was found in NfL (2.36% per year) and GFAP (1.18% per year). Longitudinal evaluation of NfL was then conducted in a separate cohort of 80 NHV at baseline, day 14 (range 11-17), and day 28 (range 26-56). A 1.64-fold increase from baseline in serum NfL was calculated as the ULN. Putting this threshold into context with published reports on NfL across a large variety of injury and disease settings, the 1.64-fold threshold is well positioned to discriminate between healthy and NS injury. Altogether, these findings provide a framework for longitudinal monitoring of serum NfL as a biomarker for neuronal damage in multiple contexts of use, including drug-induced injury.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.