Óscar Peris-Baquero, Alba Fadrique-Jiménez, Iván Prieto-Rollan, Laura Camacho-Guerrero, Selene Martínez-Lluesma, Jorge Osma
{"title":"西班牙初级保健服务中情绪障碍跨诊断治疗统一协议的简要版本:可行性试点研究的结果。","authors":"Óscar Peris-Baquero, Alba Fadrique-Jiménez, Iván Prieto-Rollan, Laura Camacho-Guerrero, Selene Martínez-Lluesma, Jorge Osma","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, there has been a growing interest in integrating psychological treatments in primary care (PC) for individuals with emotional disorders (EDs), as an alternative to the pharmacological treatments typically offered. Transdiagnostic interventions, such as the Unified Protocol for the Treatment of EDs (UP), in brief group format, have emerged as a viable option for treating EDs in PC services. The aim of the present study was to compare the preliminary clinical utility and feasibility (adherence, quality, usefulness, satisfaction of the intervention, among others) of the UP applied in two group formats of 5 and 8 sessions in a PC setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of 43 individuals (72.1% women) with a mean age of 40.7 years (SD = 10.77) treated in PC of the Spanish public health system who had a diagnosis of EDss and who were randomized to two treatment conditions: the 8-session (n = 28) or the 5-session (n = 15) UP group. The variables assessed pre- and posttreatment and at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up were anxiety, depression, transdiagnostic emotional regulation dimensions, interference and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over time, statistically significant changes were observed in all variables assessed in both conditions (except for positive temperament and social anxiety). No statistically significant differences were found between the two study conditions (except for traumatic re-experiencing, with higher scores found in the 5-session group), neither in adherence, quality, usefulness, satisfaction, or other feasibility variables, showing high scores in all of them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The UP in a brief and group format, whether via 5 or 8 group sessions, could be clinically useful and a feasible proposal for addressing EDs in Spanish PC settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT06547450.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief Versions of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Spanish Primary Care Service: Results of a Feasibility Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Óscar Peris-Baquero, Alba Fadrique-Jiménez, Iván Prieto-Rollan, Laura Camacho-Guerrero, Selene Martínez-Lluesma, Jorge Osma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jclp.70016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, there has been a growing interest in integrating psychological treatments in primary care (PC) for individuals with emotional disorders (EDs), as an alternative to the pharmacological treatments typically offered. Transdiagnostic interventions, such as the Unified Protocol for the Treatment of EDs (UP), in brief group format, have emerged as a viable option for treating EDs in PC services. The aim of the present study was to compare the preliminary clinical utility and feasibility (adherence, quality, usefulness, satisfaction of the intervention, among others) of the UP applied in two group formats of 5 and 8 sessions in a PC setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of 43 individuals (72.1% women) with a mean age of 40.7 years (SD = 10.77) treated in PC of the Spanish public health system who had a diagnosis of EDss and who were randomized to two treatment conditions: the 8-session (n = 28) or the 5-session (n = 15) UP group. The variables assessed pre- and posttreatment and at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up were anxiety, depression, transdiagnostic emotional regulation dimensions, interference and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over time, statistically significant changes were observed in all variables assessed in both conditions (except for positive temperament and social anxiety). No statistically significant differences were found between the two study conditions (except for traumatic re-experiencing, with higher scores found in the 5-session group), neither in adherence, quality, usefulness, satisfaction, or other feasibility variables, showing high scores in all of them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The UP in a brief and group format, whether via 5 or 8 group sessions, could be clinically useful and a feasible proposal for addressing EDs in Spanish PC settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT06547450.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Brief Versions of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Spanish Primary Care Service: Results of a Feasibility Pilot Study.
Introduction: In recent years, there has been a growing interest in integrating psychological treatments in primary care (PC) for individuals with emotional disorders (EDs), as an alternative to the pharmacological treatments typically offered. Transdiagnostic interventions, such as the Unified Protocol for the Treatment of EDs (UP), in brief group format, have emerged as a viable option for treating EDs in PC services. The aim of the present study was to compare the preliminary clinical utility and feasibility (adherence, quality, usefulness, satisfaction of the intervention, among others) of the UP applied in two group formats of 5 and 8 sessions in a PC setting.
Method: The sample consisted of 43 individuals (72.1% women) with a mean age of 40.7 years (SD = 10.77) treated in PC of the Spanish public health system who had a diagnosis of EDss and who were randomized to two treatment conditions: the 8-session (n = 28) or the 5-session (n = 15) UP group. The variables assessed pre- and posttreatment and at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up were anxiety, depression, transdiagnostic emotional regulation dimensions, interference and quality of life.
Results: Over time, statistically significant changes were observed in all variables assessed in both conditions (except for positive temperament and social anxiety). No statistically significant differences were found between the two study conditions (except for traumatic re-experiencing, with higher scores found in the 5-session group), neither in adherence, quality, usefulness, satisfaction, or other feasibility variables, showing high scores in all of them.
Conclusion: The UP in a brief and group format, whether via 5 or 8 group sessions, could be clinically useful and a feasible proposal for addressing EDs in Spanish PC settings.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.