Greg Durm, Hirva Mamdani, Sandra Althouse, Susan Perkins, Salma K Jabbour, Apar Kishor Ganti, Shadia Jalal, Jason Chesney, Jarushka Naidoo, Borys Hrinczenko, Mary Jo Fidler, Ticiana A Leal, Lawrence Feldman, Naomi Fujioka, Nasser H Hanna
{"title":"nivolumab联合ipilimumab或nivolumab单用巩固免疫治疗并发放化疗治疗不可切除的IIIA/IIIB期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的随机II期研究:Big Ten cancer Research Consortium LUN16-081。","authors":"Greg Durm, Hirva Mamdani, Sandra Althouse, Susan Perkins, Salma K Jabbour, Apar Kishor Ganti, Shadia Jalal, Jason Chesney, Jarushka Naidoo, Borys Hrinczenko, Mary Jo Fidler, Ticiana A Leal, Lawrence Feldman, Naomi Fujioka, Nasser H Hanna","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2024-010316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal duration and regimen of consolidation immunotherapy following chemoradiation is unknown. Despite improved outcomes with 12 months of durvalumab, which has become the standard of care, new strategies to improve survival are needed. This study evaluates dual immunotherapy in the consolidation setting following concurrent chemoradiation as well as a shorter (6 months) treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following concurrent chemoradiation, subjects were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab alone (480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) or combination nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) for up to 6 months. Primary endpoint was 18-month progression-free survival (PFS), and each arm was compared with appropriate historical controls. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to metastatic disease, and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>105 patients enrolled (54 nivolumab alone; 51 nivolumab/ipilimumab). Median follow-up was 29.1 months for nivolumab and 30 months for nivolumab/ipilimumab. For nivolumab alone, 18-month PFS was 65.5% (95% CI, 49.8% to 77.3%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation alone (p<0.1). Median PFS was 29.7 months (95% CI, 16.5 to Not Reached), and median OS was 32 months (95% CI, 32 to NR). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, 18-month PFS was 66.3% (95% CI, 56.3% to 74.5%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation followed by durvalumab (p<0.1). Median PFS was 26.3 months (95% CI, 18.6 to NR), and median OS was not reached (95% CI, 30.9 to NR). Rate of any-grade treatment-related adverse events was 72.2% (grade ≥3=18.5%) for nivolumab and 80.4% (grade ≥3=29.4%) for nivolumab/ipilimumab. Most common adverse events (grade 3/4) for nivolumab were fatigue 31.5% (0%), pneumonitis 20.4% (7.4%), rash 16.7% (3.7%), dyspnea 14.8% (0%), and hypothyroidism 14.8% (0%). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, they were fatigue 31.4% (3.9%), pneumonitis 23.5% (11.7%), diarrhea 19.6% (2%), dyspnea 19.6% (0%), pruritus 17.7% (0%), hypothyroidism 15.7% (0%), rash 15.7% (2%), arthralgias 11.8% (0%), and nausea 11.8% (0%). Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis was similar for nivolumab (20.4%) and nivolumab/ipilimumab (19.6%), but grade 3 or higher pneumonitis was more common in the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm (11.8% vs 7.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite only 6 months of consolidation immunotherapy, nivolumab alone and combination nivolumab/ipilimumab both demonstrated improved 18-month PFS over appropriate historical controls. Overall toxicity, including grade 3 pneumonitis, was higher in the combination arm.</p>","PeriodicalId":14820,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized phase II study of consolidation immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab or nivolumab alone following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium LUN16-081.\",\"authors\":\"Greg Durm, Hirva Mamdani, Sandra Althouse, Susan Perkins, Salma K Jabbour, Apar Kishor Ganti, Shadia Jalal, Jason Chesney, Jarushka Naidoo, Borys Hrinczenko, Mary Jo Fidler, Ticiana A Leal, Lawrence Feldman, Naomi Fujioka, Nasser H Hanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jitc-2024-010316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal duration and regimen of consolidation immunotherapy following chemoradiation is unknown. Despite improved outcomes with 12 months of durvalumab, which has become the standard of care, new strategies to improve survival are needed. This study evaluates dual immunotherapy in the consolidation setting following concurrent chemoradiation as well as a shorter (6 months) treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following concurrent chemoradiation, subjects were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab alone (480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) or combination nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) for up to 6 months. Primary endpoint was 18-month progression-free survival (PFS), and each arm was compared with appropriate historical controls. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to metastatic disease, and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>105 patients enrolled (54 nivolumab alone; 51 nivolumab/ipilimumab). Median follow-up was 29.1 months for nivolumab and 30 months for nivolumab/ipilimumab. For nivolumab alone, 18-month PFS was 65.5% (95% CI, 49.8% to 77.3%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation alone (p<0.1). Median PFS was 29.7 months (95% CI, 16.5 to Not Reached), and median OS was 32 months (95% CI, 32 to NR). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, 18-month PFS was 66.3% (95% CI, 56.3% to 74.5%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation followed by durvalumab (p<0.1). Median PFS was 26.3 months (95% CI, 18.6 to NR), and median OS was not reached (95% CI, 30.9 to NR). Rate of any-grade treatment-related adverse events was 72.2% (grade ≥3=18.5%) for nivolumab and 80.4% (grade ≥3=29.4%) for nivolumab/ipilimumab. Most common adverse events (grade 3/4) for nivolumab were fatigue 31.5% (0%), pneumonitis 20.4% (7.4%), rash 16.7% (3.7%), dyspnea 14.8% (0%), and hypothyroidism 14.8% (0%). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, they were fatigue 31.4% (3.9%), pneumonitis 23.5% (11.7%), diarrhea 19.6% (2%), dyspnea 19.6% (0%), pruritus 17.7% (0%), hypothyroidism 15.7% (0%), rash 15.7% (2%), arthralgias 11.8% (0%), and nausea 11.8% (0%). Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis was similar for nivolumab (20.4%) and nivolumab/ipilimumab (19.6%), but grade 3 or higher pneumonitis was more common in the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm (11.8% vs 7.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite only 6 months of consolidation immunotherapy, nivolumab alone and combination nivolumab/ipilimumab both demonstrated improved 18-month PFS over appropriate historical controls. Overall toxicity, including grade 3 pneumonitis, was higher in the combination arm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265819/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010316\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Randomized phase II study of consolidation immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab or nivolumab alone following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium LUN16-081.
Background: For unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal duration and regimen of consolidation immunotherapy following chemoradiation is unknown. Despite improved outcomes with 12 months of durvalumab, which has become the standard of care, new strategies to improve survival are needed. This study evaluates dual immunotherapy in the consolidation setting following concurrent chemoradiation as well as a shorter (6 months) treatment duration.
Methods: Following concurrent chemoradiation, subjects were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab alone (480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) or combination nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) for up to 6 months. Primary endpoint was 18-month progression-free survival (PFS), and each arm was compared with appropriate historical controls. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to metastatic disease, and toxicity.
Results: 105 patients enrolled (54 nivolumab alone; 51 nivolumab/ipilimumab). Median follow-up was 29.1 months for nivolumab and 30 months for nivolumab/ipilimumab. For nivolumab alone, 18-month PFS was 65.5% (95% CI, 49.8% to 77.3%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation alone (p<0.1). Median PFS was 29.7 months (95% CI, 16.5 to Not Reached), and median OS was 32 months (95% CI, 32 to NR). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, 18-month PFS was 66.3% (95% CI, 56.3% to 74.5%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation followed by durvalumab (p<0.1). Median PFS was 26.3 months (95% CI, 18.6 to NR), and median OS was not reached (95% CI, 30.9 to NR). Rate of any-grade treatment-related adverse events was 72.2% (grade ≥3=18.5%) for nivolumab and 80.4% (grade ≥3=29.4%) for nivolumab/ipilimumab. Most common adverse events (grade 3/4) for nivolumab were fatigue 31.5% (0%), pneumonitis 20.4% (7.4%), rash 16.7% (3.7%), dyspnea 14.8% (0%), and hypothyroidism 14.8% (0%). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, they were fatigue 31.4% (3.9%), pneumonitis 23.5% (11.7%), diarrhea 19.6% (2%), dyspnea 19.6% (0%), pruritus 17.7% (0%), hypothyroidism 15.7% (0%), rash 15.7% (2%), arthralgias 11.8% (0%), and nausea 11.8% (0%). Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis was similar for nivolumab (20.4%) and nivolumab/ipilimumab (19.6%), but grade 3 or higher pneumonitis was more common in the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm (11.8% vs 7.4%).
Conclusion: Despite only 6 months of consolidation immunotherapy, nivolumab alone and combination nivolumab/ipilimumab both demonstrated improved 18-month PFS over appropriate historical controls. Overall toxicity, including grade 3 pneumonitis, was higher in the combination arm.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) is a peer-reviewed publication that promotes scientific exchange and deepens knowledge in the constantly evolving fields of tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy. With an open access format, JITC encourages widespread access to its findings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, spanning from basic science to translational and clinical research. Key areas of interest include tumor-host interactions, the intricate tumor microenvironment, animal models, the identification of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers, groundbreaking pharmaceutical and cellular therapies, innovative vaccines, combination immune-based treatments, and the study of immune-related toxicity.