nivolumab联合ipilimumab或nivolumab单用巩固免疫治疗并发放化疗治疗不可切除的IIIA/IIIB期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的随机II期研究:Big Ten cancer Research Consortium LUN16-081。

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Greg Durm, Hirva Mamdani, Sandra Althouse, Susan Perkins, Salma K Jabbour, Apar Kishor Ganti, Shadia Jalal, Jason Chesney, Jarushka Naidoo, Borys Hrinczenko, Mary Jo Fidler, Ticiana A Leal, Lawrence Feldman, Naomi Fujioka, Nasser H Hanna
{"title":"nivolumab联合ipilimumab或nivolumab单用巩固免疫治疗并发放化疗治疗不可切除的IIIA/IIIB期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的随机II期研究:Big Ten cancer Research Consortium LUN16-081。","authors":"Greg Durm, Hirva Mamdani, Sandra Althouse, Susan Perkins, Salma K Jabbour, Apar Kishor Ganti, Shadia Jalal, Jason Chesney, Jarushka Naidoo, Borys Hrinczenko, Mary Jo Fidler, Ticiana A Leal, Lawrence Feldman, Naomi Fujioka, Nasser H Hanna","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2024-010316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal duration and regimen of consolidation immunotherapy following chemoradiation is unknown. Despite improved outcomes with 12 months of durvalumab, which has become the standard of care, new strategies to improve survival are needed. This study evaluates dual immunotherapy in the consolidation setting following concurrent chemoradiation as well as a shorter (6 months) treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following concurrent chemoradiation, subjects were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab alone (480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) or combination nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) for up to 6 months. Primary endpoint was 18-month progression-free survival (PFS), and each arm was compared with appropriate historical controls. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to metastatic disease, and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>105 patients enrolled (54 nivolumab alone; 51 nivolumab/ipilimumab). Median follow-up was 29.1 months for nivolumab and 30 months for nivolumab/ipilimumab. For nivolumab alone, 18-month PFS was 65.5% (95% CI, 49.8% to 77.3%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation alone (p<0.1). Median PFS was 29.7 months (95% CI, 16.5 to Not Reached), and median OS was 32 months (95% CI, 32 to NR). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, 18-month PFS was 66.3% (95% CI, 56.3% to 74.5%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation followed by durvalumab (p<0.1). Median PFS was 26.3 months (95% CI, 18.6 to NR), and median OS was not reached (95% CI, 30.9 to NR). Rate of any-grade treatment-related adverse events was 72.2% (grade ≥3=18.5%) for nivolumab and 80.4% (grade ≥3=29.4%) for nivolumab/ipilimumab. Most common adverse events (grade 3/4) for nivolumab were fatigue 31.5% (0%), pneumonitis 20.4% (7.4%), rash 16.7% (3.7%), dyspnea 14.8% (0%), and hypothyroidism 14.8% (0%). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, they were fatigue 31.4% (3.9%), pneumonitis 23.5% (11.7%), diarrhea 19.6% (2%), dyspnea 19.6% (0%), pruritus 17.7% (0%), hypothyroidism 15.7% (0%), rash 15.7% (2%), arthralgias 11.8% (0%), and nausea 11.8% (0%). Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis was similar for nivolumab (20.4%) and nivolumab/ipilimumab (19.6%), but grade 3 or higher pneumonitis was more common in the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm (11.8% vs 7.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite only 6 months of consolidation immunotherapy, nivolumab alone and combination nivolumab/ipilimumab both demonstrated improved 18-month PFS over appropriate historical controls. Overall toxicity, including grade 3 pneumonitis, was higher in the combination arm.</p>","PeriodicalId":14820,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized phase II study of consolidation immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab or nivolumab alone following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium LUN16-081.\",\"authors\":\"Greg Durm, Hirva Mamdani, Sandra Althouse, Susan Perkins, Salma K Jabbour, Apar Kishor Ganti, Shadia Jalal, Jason Chesney, Jarushka Naidoo, Borys Hrinczenko, Mary Jo Fidler, Ticiana A Leal, Lawrence Feldman, Naomi Fujioka, Nasser H Hanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jitc-2024-010316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal duration and regimen of consolidation immunotherapy following chemoradiation is unknown. Despite improved outcomes with 12 months of durvalumab, which has become the standard of care, new strategies to improve survival are needed. This study evaluates dual immunotherapy in the consolidation setting following concurrent chemoradiation as well as a shorter (6 months) treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following concurrent chemoradiation, subjects were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab alone (480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) or combination nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) for up to 6 months. Primary endpoint was 18-month progression-free survival (PFS), and each arm was compared with appropriate historical controls. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to metastatic disease, and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>105 patients enrolled (54 nivolumab alone; 51 nivolumab/ipilimumab). Median follow-up was 29.1 months for nivolumab and 30 months for nivolumab/ipilimumab. For nivolumab alone, 18-month PFS was 65.5% (95% CI, 49.8% to 77.3%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation alone (p<0.1). Median PFS was 29.7 months (95% CI, 16.5 to Not Reached), and median OS was 32 months (95% CI, 32 to NR). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, 18-month PFS was 66.3% (95% CI, 56.3% to 74.5%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation followed by durvalumab (p<0.1). Median PFS was 26.3 months (95% CI, 18.6 to NR), and median OS was not reached (95% CI, 30.9 to NR). Rate of any-grade treatment-related adverse events was 72.2% (grade ≥3=18.5%) for nivolumab and 80.4% (grade ≥3=29.4%) for nivolumab/ipilimumab. Most common adverse events (grade 3/4) for nivolumab were fatigue 31.5% (0%), pneumonitis 20.4% (7.4%), rash 16.7% (3.7%), dyspnea 14.8% (0%), and hypothyroidism 14.8% (0%). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, they were fatigue 31.4% (3.9%), pneumonitis 23.5% (11.7%), diarrhea 19.6% (2%), dyspnea 19.6% (0%), pruritus 17.7% (0%), hypothyroidism 15.7% (0%), rash 15.7% (2%), arthralgias 11.8% (0%), and nausea 11.8% (0%). Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis was similar for nivolumab (20.4%) and nivolumab/ipilimumab (19.6%), but grade 3 or higher pneumonitis was more common in the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm (11.8% vs 7.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite only 6 months of consolidation immunotherapy, nivolumab alone and combination nivolumab/ipilimumab both demonstrated improved 18-month PFS over appropriate historical controls. Overall toxicity, including grade 3 pneumonitis, was higher in the combination arm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265819/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010316\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于不可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),放化疗后巩固免疫治疗的最佳持续时间和方案尚不清楚。尽管12个月的durvalumab治疗改善了预后,但仍需要新的策略来提高生存率。durvalumab已成为标准治疗方案。本研究评估了双重免疫治疗在同步放化疗后的巩固设置,以及较短的治疗时间(6个月)。方法:在同步放化疗后,受试者按1:1随机分配到单独纳武单抗(每4周静脉注射480 mg)或纳武单抗(每2周静脉注射240 mg)和伊匹单抗(每6周1 mg/kg),持续6个月。主要终点是18个月无进展生存期(PFS),每个组与适当的历史对照进行比较。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、转移时间和毒性。结果:纳入105例患者(54例单独纳武单抗;51 nivolumab / ipilimumab)。纳武单抗的中位随访时间为29.1个月,纳武单抗/伊匹单抗的中位随访时间为30个月。单独使用纳武单抗,18个月的PFS为65.5% (95% CI, 49.8%至77.3%),与单独放化疗的历史对照相比,统计学上有显著改善(结论:尽管只有6个月的巩固免疫治疗,但单独使用纳武单抗和纳武单抗/伊匹单抗联合使用都比适当的历史对照显示18个月的PFS有所改善。包括3级肺炎在内的总毒性在联合用药组更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized phase II study of consolidation immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab or nivolumab alone following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium LUN16-081.

Background: For unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal duration and regimen of consolidation immunotherapy following chemoradiation is unknown. Despite improved outcomes with 12 months of durvalumab, which has become the standard of care, new strategies to improve survival are needed. This study evaluates dual immunotherapy in the consolidation setting following concurrent chemoradiation as well as a shorter (6 months) treatment duration.

Methods: Following concurrent chemoradiation, subjects were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab alone (480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) or combination nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) for up to 6 months. Primary endpoint was 18-month progression-free survival (PFS), and each arm was compared with appropriate historical controls. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to metastatic disease, and toxicity.

Results: 105 patients enrolled (54 nivolumab alone; 51 nivolumab/ipilimumab). Median follow-up was 29.1 months for nivolumab and 30 months for nivolumab/ipilimumab. For nivolumab alone, 18-month PFS was 65.5% (95% CI, 49.8% to 77.3%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation alone (p<0.1). Median PFS was 29.7 months (95% CI, 16.5 to Not Reached), and median OS was 32 months (95% CI, 32 to NR). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, 18-month PFS was 66.3% (95% CI, 56.3% to 74.5%), a statistically significant improvement over the historical control of chemoradiation followed by durvalumab (p<0.1). Median PFS was 26.3 months (95% CI, 18.6 to NR), and median OS was not reached (95% CI, 30.9 to NR). Rate of any-grade treatment-related adverse events was 72.2% (grade ≥3=18.5%) for nivolumab and 80.4% (grade ≥3=29.4%) for nivolumab/ipilimumab. Most common adverse events (grade 3/4) for nivolumab were fatigue 31.5% (0%), pneumonitis 20.4% (7.4%), rash 16.7% (3.7%), dyspnea 14.8% (0%), and hypothyroidism 14.8% (0%). For nivolumab/ipilimumab, they were fatigue 31.4% (3.9%), pneumonitis 23.5% (11.7%), diarrhea 19.6% (2%), dyspnea 19.6% (0%), pruritus 17.7% (0%), hypothyroidism 15.7% (0%), rash 15.7% (2%), arthralgias 11.8% (0%), and nausea 11.8% (0%). Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis was similar for nivolumab (20.4%) and nivolumab/ipilimumab (19.6%), but grade 3 or higher pneumonitis was more common in the nivolumab/ipilimumab arm (11.8% vs 7.4%).

Conclusion: Despite only 6 months of consolidation immunotherapy, nivolumab alone and combination nivolumab/ipilimumab both demonstrated improved 18-month PFS over appropriate historical controls. Overall toxicity, including grade 3 pneumonitis, was higher in the combination arm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
4.60%
发文量
522
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) is a peer-reviewed publication that promotes scientific exchange and deepens knowledge in the constantly evolving fields of tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy. With an open access format, JITC encourages widespread access to its findings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, spanning from basic science to translational and clinical research. Key areas of interest include tumor-host interactions, the intricate tumor microenvironment, animal models, the identification of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers, groundbreaking pharmaceutical and cellular therapies, innovative vaccines, combination immune-based treatments, and the study of immune-related toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信