孟鲁司特-左西替利嗪联合治疗与单药治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Ji-Sun Kim, Gulnaz Stybayeva, Se Hwan Hwang
{"title":"孟鲁司特-左西替利嗪联合治疗与单药治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ji-Sun Kim, Gulnaz Stybayeva, Se Hwan Hwang","doi":"10.1159/000547410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Combination therapy with antihistamines and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) is frequently used in allergic rhinitis (AR), particularly in patients with persistent or inadequately controlled symptoms. However, supporting evidence has been inconsistent. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of montelukast combined with levocetirizine in patients with AR by directly comparing the combination therapy with each monotherapy and evaluating individual symptom domains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted, with database searches performed through March 2025. Outcomes included daytime and nighttime total symptom scores, individual nasal symptoms, rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality of life (RQLQ), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Pooled effects were calculated using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs (n = 887) were included. Combination therapy resulted in greater improvement in daytime symptoms (SMD [95% CI]: -0.42 [-0.64 to -0.20]), rhinorrhea (SMD [95% CI]: -0.69 [-1.09 to -0.30]), and nasal congestion (SMD [95% CI]: -0.64 [-1.05 to -0.24]) compared to monotherapy. RQLQ scores improved modestly overall (SMD [95% CI]: -0.37 [-0.72 to -0.01]), but subgroup analyses showed no significant difference compared to individual agents. TEAE rates were similar across groups (OR [95% CI]: 1.05 [0.57 to 1.94]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Montelukast-levocetirizine combination therapy provided superior symptom control without increased adverse events, supporting its use as a potential treatment option in selected patients with AR.</p>","PeriodicalId":13652,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy of Montelukast-Levocetirizine Combination Therapy versus Monotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Sun Kim, Gulnaz Stybayeva, Se Hwan Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Combination therapy with antihistamines and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) is frequently used in allergic rhinitis (AR), particularly in patients with persistent or inadequately controlled symptoms. However, supporting evidence has been inconsistent. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of montelukast combined with levocetirizine in patients with AR by directly comparing the combination therapy with each monotherapy and evaluating individual symptom domains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted, with database searches performed through March 2025. Outcomes included daytime and nighttime total symptom scores, individual nasal symptoms, rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality of life (RQLQ), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Pooled effects were calculated using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs (n = 887) were included. Combination therapy resulted in greater improvement in daytime symptoms (SMD [95% CI]: -0.42 [-0.64 to -0.20]), rhinorrhea (SMD [95% CI]: -0.69 [-1.09 to -0.30]), and nasal congestion (SMD [95% CI]: -0.64 [-1.05 to -0.24]) compared to monotherapy. RQLQ scores improved modestly overall (SMD [95% CI]: -0.37 [-0.72 to -0.01]), but subgroup analyses showed no significant difference compared to individual agents. TEAE rates were similar across groups (OR [95% CI]: 1.05 [0.57 to 1.94]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Montelukast-levocetirizine combination therapy provided superior symptom control without increased adverse events, supporting its use as a potential treatment option in selected patients with AR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503583/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547410\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:抗组胺药和白三烯受体拮抗剂(LTRAs)联合治疗常用于变应性鼻炎(AR),特别是在症状持续或控制不充分的患者中。然而,支持的证据并不一致。本荟萃分析评估了孟鲁司特联合左西替利嗪对变应性鼻炎患者的疗效,通过直接比较联合治疗与每种单药治疗并评估个体症状域。方法:进行随机对照试验(rct)的系统回顾和荟萃分析,数据库检索至2025年3月。结果包括白天和夜间总症状评分、个体鼻症状、鼻结膜炎相关生活质量(RQLQ)和治疗后出现的不良事件(teae)。采用标准化平均差异(SMDs)和95%置信区间(ci)的优势比(ORs)计算合并效应。结果:纳入7项rct (n = 887)。与单药治疗相比,联合治疗在日间症状(SMD [95% CI]: -0.42[-0.64至-0.20])、鼻漏(SMD [95% CI]: -0.69[-1.09至-0.30])和鼻塞(SMD [95% CI]: -0.64[-1.05至-0.24])方面有更大的改善。RQLQ评分总体上略有改善(SMD [95% CI]: -0.37[-0.72至-0.01]),但亚组分析显示与单个药物相比无显著差异。各组间TEAE发生率相似(OR [95% CI]: 1.05[0.57 ~ 1.94])。结论:孟鲁司特-左西替利嗪联合治疗提供了良好的症状控制,没有增加不良事件,支持其作为AR患者的潜在治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Efficacy of Montelukast-Levocetirizine Combination Therapy versus Monotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Combination therapy with antihistamines and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) is frequently used in allergic rhinitis (AR), particularly in patients with persistent or inadequately controlled symptoms. However, supporting evidence has been inconsistent. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of montelukast combined with levocetirizine in patients with AR by directly comparing the combination therapy with each monotherapy and evaluating individual symptom domains.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted, with database searches performed through March 2025. Outcomes included daytime and nighttime total symptom scores, individual nasal symptoms, rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality of life (RQLQ), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Pooled effects were calculated using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Seven RCTs (n = 887) were included. Combination therapy resulted in greater improvement in daytime symptoms (SMD [95% CI]: -0.42 [-0.64 to -0.20]), rhinorrhea (SMD [95% CI]: -0.69 [-1.09 to -0.30]), and nasal congestion (SMD [95% CI]: -0.64 [-1.05 to -0.24]) compared to monotherapy. RQLQ scores improved modestly overall (SMD [95% CI]: -0.37 [-0.72 to -0.01]), but subgroup analyses showed no significant difference compared to individual agents. TEAE rates were similar across groups (OR [95% CI]: 1.05 [0.57 to 1.94]).

Conclusion: Montelukast-levocetirizine combination therapy provided superior symptom control without increased adverse events, supporting its use as a potential treatment option in selected patients with AR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
105
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ''International Archives of Allergy and Immunology'' provides a forum for basic and clinical research in modern molecular and cellular allergology and immunology. Appearing monthly, the journal publishes original work in the fields of allergy, immunopathology, immunogenetics, immunopharmacology, immunoendocrinology, tumor immunology, mucosal immunity, transplantation and immunology of infectious and connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信