妊娠早期TSH和FT4与胎龄的标准化及其与临床结果的关系

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
European Thyroid Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-22 Print Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1530/ETJ-24-0344
Joris A J Osinga, Layal Chaker, Sjoerd van den Berg, Vincent W V Jaddoe, Eric A P Steegers, Henning Tiemeier, Robin P Peeters, Tim Korevaar
{"title":"妊娠早期TSH和FT4与胎龄的标准化及其与临床结果的关系","authors":"Joris A J Osinga, Layal Chaker, Sjoerd van den Berg, Vincent W V Jaddoe, Eric A P Steegers, Henning Tiemeier, Robin P Peeters, Tim Korevaar","doi":"10.1530/ETJ-24-0344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To account for pregnancy-specific changes in thyroid physiology, international guidelines recommend the use of trimester-specific reference intervals. However, the pragmatic division in trimesters does not necessarily align with the changes in thyroid physiology. While the goal of treating gestational thyroid dysfunction is to prevent thyroid hormone-mediated adverse events, it remains unclear which method of standardizing to gestational age, if any, is most effective in identifying individuals at higher risk of adverse pregnancy events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 5,675 women participating in a population-based prospective cohort with data on thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroperoxidase antibodies (TPOAbs) during early pregnancy (median: 13.2 weeks, 95% range: 9.8-17.6). We studied the association of TSH and FT4 with pre-eclampsia, premature delivery, birth weight and offspring IQ with or without full gestational age standardization of TSH and FT4 using multivariable regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a positive association of gestational age at blood sampling with TSH (difference in mean TSH: +9.6%; P < 0.001) and a negative association with FT4 (difference in mean FT4: -20.2%; P < 0.001). Standardizing TSH to gestational age led to reclassification of 36 women as having normal TSH (9.9%) and 27 as having abnormal TSH (0.5%). For FT4, 62 women were reclassified as having normal FT4 (20.3%) and 57 as having abnormal FT4 (1.1%). Standardization of TSH and FT4 concentrations led to an attenuation of the associations with any outcome of up to 71% as compared to non-standardized TSH or FT4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Full standardization of TSH and FT4 to gestational age either does not affect or weakens their associations with clinical outcomes, suggesting that accounting for gestational age offers no benefit with regard to identifying high-risk thyroid dysfunction during early pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12159,"journal":{"name":"European Thyroid Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12284872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardization of TSH and FT4 to gestational age in early pregnancy and associations with clinical outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Joris A J Osinga, Layal Chaker, Sjoerd van den Berg, Vincent W V Jaddoe, Eric A P Steegers, Henning Tiemeier, Robin P Peeters, Tim Korevaar\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/ETJ-24-0344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To account for pregnancy-specific changes in thyroid physiology, international guidelines recommend the use of trimester-specific reference intervals. However, the pragmatic division in trimesters does not necessarily align with the changes in thyroid physiology. While the goal of treating gestational thyroid dysfunction is to prevent thyroid hormone-mediated adverse events, it remains unclear which method of standardizing to gestational age, if any, is most effective in identifying individuals at higher risk of adverse pregnancy events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 5,675 women participating in a population-based prospective cohort with data on thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroperoxidase antibodies (TPOAbs) during early pregnancy (median: 13.2 weeks, 95% range: 9.8-17.6). We studied the association of TSH and FT4 with pre-eclampsia, premature delivery, birth weight and offspring IQ with or without full gestational age standardization of TSH and FT4 using multivariable regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a positive association of gestational age at blood sampling with TSH (difference in mean TSH: +9.6%; P < 0.001) and a negative association with FT4 (difference in mean FT4: -20.2%; P < 0.001). Standardizing TSH to gestational age led to reclassification of 36 women as having normal TSH (9.9%) and 27 as having abnormal TSH (0.5%). For FT4, 62 women were reclassified as having normal FT4 (20.3%) and 57 as having abnormal FT4 (1.1%). Standardization of TSH and FT4 concentrations led to an attenuation of the associations with any outcome of up to 71% as compared to non-standardized TSH or FT4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Full standardization of TSH and FT4 to gestational age either does not affect or weakens their associations with clinical outcomes, suggesting that accounting for gestational age offers no benefit with regard to identifying high-risk thyroid dysfunction during early pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Thyroid Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12284872/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Thyroid Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/ETJ-24-0344\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Thyroid Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/ETJ-24-0344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了解释妊娠期甲状腺生理的特异性变化,国际指南推荐使用妊娠期特异性参考区间。然而,妊娠期的实际划分并不一定与甲状腺生理的变化一致。虽然治疗妊娠期甲状腺功能障碍的目标是预防甲状腺激素介导的不良事件,但目前尚不清楚哪种标准孕龄方法(如果有的话)最有效地识别高危妊娠不良事件个体。方法:我们纳入了5675名妇女,她们参加了一个基于人群的前瞻性队列,在妊娠早期(中位13.2周,95%范围9.8-17.6)进行促甲状腺激素(TSH)、游离甲状腺素(FT4)和甲状腺过氧化物酶抗体(TPOAb)的数据。我们使用多变量回归模型研究了TSH和FT4与子痫前期、早产、出生体重和后代智商的关系,无论是否有TSH和FT4的全胎龄标准化。结果:采血时胎龄与TSH呈正相关(平均TSH差值:+9.6%;结论:将TSH和FT4与胎龄完全标准化既不影响也不削弱其与临床结果的关联,这表明考虑胎龄对识别妊娠早期甲状腺功能障碍的高风险没有任何好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Standardization of TSH and FT4 to gestational age in early pregnancy and associations with clinical outcomes.

Standardization of TSH and FT4 to gestational age in early pregnancy and associations with clinical outcomes.

Standardization of TSH and FT4 to gestational age in early pregnancy and associations with clinical outcomes.

Standardization of TSH and FT4 to gestational age in early pregnancy and associations with clinical outcomes.

Background: To account for pregnancy-specific changes in thyroid physiology, international guidelines recommend the use of trimester-specific reference intervals. However, the pragmatic division in trimesters does not necessarily align with the changes in thyroid physiology. While the goal of treating gestational thyroid dysfunction is to prevent thyroid hormone-mediated adverse events, it remains unclear which method of standardizing to gestational age, if any, is most effective in identifying individuals at higher risk of adverse pregnancy events.

Methods: We included 5,675 women participating in a population-based prospective cohort with data on thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroperoxidase antibodies (TPOAbs) during early pregnancy (median: 13.2 weeks, 95% range: 9.8-17.6). We studied the association of TSH and FT4 with pre-eclampsia, premature delivery, birth weight and offspring IQ with or without full gestational age standardization of TSH and FT4 using multivariable regression models.

Results: There was a positive association of gestational age at blood sampling with TSH (difference in mean TSH: +9.6%; P < 0.001) and a negative association with FT4 (difference in mean FT4: -20.2%; P < 0.001). Standardizing TSH to gestational age led to reclassification of 36 women as having normal TSH (9.9%) and 27 as having abnormal TSH (0.5%). For FT4, 62 women were reclassified as having normal FT4 (20.3%) and 57 as having abnormal FT4 (1.1%). Standardization of TSH and FT4 concentrations led to an attenuation of the associations with any outcome of up to 71% as compared to non-standardized TSH or FT4.

Conclusions: Full standardization of TSH and FT4 to gestational age either does not affect or weakens their associations with clinical outcomes, suggesting that accounting for gestational age offers no benefit with regard to identifying high-risk thyroid dysfunction during early pregnancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Thyroid Journal
European Thyroid Journal Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: The ''European Thyroid Journal'' publishes papers reporting original research in basic, translational and clinical thyroidology. Original contributions cover all aspects of the field, from molecular and cellular biology to immunology and biochemistry, from physiology to pathology, and from pediatric to adult thyroid diseases with a special focus on thyroid cancer. Readers also benefit from reviews by noted experts, which highlight especially active areas of current research. The journal will further publish formal guidelines in the field, produced and endorsed by the European Thyroid Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信