院级门到体外心肺复苏中位时间对难治性院外心脏骤停患者预后的影响

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Daisuke Kasugai, Yohei Okada, Yuka Mizutani, Junta Honda, Toru Kondo, Shingo Kazama, Takanori Yamamoto
{"title":"院级门到体外心肺复苏中位时间对难治性院外心脏骤停患者预后的影响","authors":"Daisuke Kasugai, Yohei Okada, Yuka Mizutani, Junta Honda, Toru Kondo, Shingo Kazama, Takanori Yamamoto","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of hospital-level median door-to-extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) time on survival and neurologic outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) requiring ECPR.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA registry, a nationwide Japanese database of OHCA patients.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fifty-three hospitals across Japan.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients who underwent ECPR between 2014 and 2021 were included. Hospitals were categorized into \"rapid\" or \"delayed\" groups based on their median door-to-ECPR times.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day survival with favorable neurologic outcomes. Propensity score weighting was applied to adjust for confounders. In total, 2136 patients treated at 53 hospitals were included. Hospitals with shorter median door-to-ECPR times had higher 30-day survival rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.21-1.53). Neurologic outcomes were better in the rapid hospital group at both 30 days (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.24-1.73) and 90 days (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.25-1.73) follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospital-level median door-to-ECPR time is a crucial predictor of survival and neurologic outcomes in OHCA patients requiring ECPR. Shorter door-to-ECPR times should be considered a key quality metric for ECPR processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Hospital-Level Median Door-to-Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Time on the Prognosis of Patients With Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Kasugai, Yohei Okada, Yuka Mizutani, Junta Honda, Toru Kondo, Shingo Kazama, Takanori Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of hospital-level median door-to-extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) time on survival and neurologic outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) requiring ECPR.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA registry, a nationwide Japanese database of OHCA patients.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fifty-three hospitals across Japan.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients who underwent ECPR between 2014 and 2021 were included. Hospitals were categorized into \\\"rapid\\\" or \\\"delayed\\\" groups based on their median door-to-ECPR times.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day survival with favorable neurologic outcomes. Propensity score weighting was applied to adjust for confounders. In total, 2136 patients treated at 53 hospitals were included. Hospitals with shorter median door-to-ECPR times had higher 30-day survival rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.21-1.53). Neurologic outcomes were better in the rapid hospital group at both 30 days (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.24-1.73) and 90 days (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.25-1.73) follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospital-level median door-to-ECPR time is a crucial predictor of survival and neurologic outcomes in OHCA patients requiring ECPR. Shorter door-to-ECPR times should be considered a key quality metric for ECPR processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006808\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006808","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者需要体外心肺复苏(ECPR)的院外平均时间对患者生存和神经系统预后的影响。设计:对日本急性医学协会OHCA注册表进行二次分析,这是一个关于OHCA患者的全国性日本数据库。地点:全日本53家医院。患者:纳入2014年至2021年间接受ECPR的成年患者。根据从门到ecpr的中位数时间,医院被分为“快速”和“延迟”两组。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:主要结果为30天生存率。次要结局包括30天和90天的生存,神经预后良好。倾向得分加权用于调整混杂因素。总共包括在53家医院接受治疗的2136名患者。门到ecpr中位时间较短的医院30天生存率较高(优势比[OR], 1.36;95% ci, 1.21-1.53)。快速住院组在30天的神经系统预后更好(OR, 1.47;95% CI, 1.24-1.73)和90天(OR, 1.47;95% CI, 1.25-1.73)随访。结论:医院水平的门到ECPR的中位时间是需要ECPR的OHCA患者生存和神经系统预后的重要预测因素。缩短从门到ECPR的时间应被视为ECPR过程的关键质量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Hospital-Level Median Door-to-Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Time on the Prognosis of Patients With Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of hospital-level median door-to-extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) time on survival and neurologic outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) requiring ECPR.

Design: Secondary analysis of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA registry, a nationwide Japanese database of OHCA patients.

Setting: Fifty-three hospitals across Japan.

Patients: Adult patients who underwent ECPR between 2014 and 2021 were included. Hospitals were categorized into "rapid" or "delayed" groups based on their median door-to-ECPR times.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day survival with favorable neurologic outcomes. Propensity score weighting was applied to adjust for confounders. In total, 2136 patients treated at 53 hospitals were included. Hospitals with shorter median door-to-ECPR times had higher 30-day survival rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.21-1.53). Neurologic outcomes were better in the rapid hospital group at both 30 days (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.24-1.73) and 90 days (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.25-1.73) follow-ups.

Conclusions: Hospital-level median door-to-ECPR time is a crucial predictor of survival and neurologic outcomes in OHCA patients requiring ECPR. Shorter door-to-ECPR times should be considered a key quality metric for ECPR processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信