难治性院外心脏骤停的心律转换和结果:体外复苏与常规复苏。

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Stepan Havranek, Jakub Neuhöfer, Michaela Vesela, Petra Kavalkova, Daniel Rob, Zdenka Fingrova, Jana Smalcova, Ondrej Franek, Michal Huptych, Milan Dusik, Jan Pudil, Vojtech Weiss, Ales Linhart, Jan Belohlavek
{"title":"难治性院外心脏骤停的心律转换和结果:体外复苏与常规复苏。","authors":"Stepan Havranek, Jakub Neuhöfer, Michaela Vesela, Petra Kavalkova, Daniel Rob, Zdenka Fingrova, Jana Smalcova, Ondrej Franek, Michal Huptych, Milan Dusik, Jan Pudil, Vojtech Weiss, Ales Linhart, Jan Belohlavek","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A Prague out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) study has demonstrated that an invasive approach (early transport to the hospital, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation [ECPR]) is a feasible and effective treatment strategy in refractory OHCA. This post hoc analysis of the Prague OHCA study aimed to stratify the prognosis of patients according to the detailed course of heart rhythm during prehospital and early hospital periods.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and patients: </strong>This analysis included all 256 patients (median age 58, 17% females) randomized to the Prague OHCA study. The sequence of heart rhythms during the prehospital period was analyzed in terms of neurologic outcomes after 180 days. The primary outcome was a composite of survival with Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at 180 days.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Within the study cohort, 156 (61%) manifested ventricular fibrillation (VF), 45 pulseless electrical activity, and 55 asystole as the initial rhythm. Patients with an initial VF who reached a sustained recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) had the highest proportion of reaching a primary outcome (32/44 [73%]). Patients who had one or more episodes of asystole during cardiopulmonary resuscitation had the lowest rate of primary endpoint (5/39 [13%]). Patients who experienced intermittent ROSC showed a higher success rate in achieving the primary outcome when treated with an invasive-based approach (including ECPR) compared with the conventional strategy (26/34 [76%] vs. 24/50 [48%]; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Achieving ROSC is the best prognostic marker in OHCA patients with an initially refractory VF. Patients with intermittent ROSC after the initial VF and ongoing VF seem to be optimal candidates for an invasive approach. Asystole detection at any time during resuscitation is a strong negative prognostic marker, irrespective of the initial rhythm.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac Rhythm Conversions and the Outcome in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Extracorporeal Versus Conventional Resuscitation.\",\"authors\":\"Stepan Havranek, Jakub Neuhöfer, Michaela Vesela, Petra Kavalkova, Daniel Rob, Zdenka Fingrova, Jana Smalcova, Ondrej Franek, Michal Huptych, Milan Dusik, Jan Pudil, Vojtech Weiss, Ales Linhart, Jan Belohlavek\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A Prague out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) study has demonstrated that an invasive approach (early transport to the hospital, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation [ECPR]) is a feasible and effective treatment strategy in refractory OHCA. This post hoc analysis of the Prague OHCA study aimed to stratify the prognosis of patients according to the detailed course of heart rhythm during prehospital and early hospital periods.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and patients: </strong>This analysis included all 256 patients (median age 58, 17% females) randomized to the Prague OHCA study. The sequence of heart rhythms during the prehospital period was analyzed in terms of neurologic outcomes after 180 days. The primary outcome was a composite of survival with Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at 180 days.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Within the study cohort, 156 (61%) manifested ventricular fibrillation (VF), 45 pulseless electrical activity, and 55 asystole as the initial rhythm. Patients with an initial VF who reached a sustained recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) had the highest proportion of reaching a primary outcome (32/44 [73%]). Patients who had one or more episodes of asystole during cardiopulmonary resuscitation had the lowest rate of primary endpoint (5/39 [13%]). Patients who experienced intermittent ROSC showed a higher success rate in achieving the primary outcome when treated with an invasive-based approach (including ECPR) compared with the conventional strategy (26/34 [76%] vs. 24/50 [48%]; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Achieving ROSC is the best prognostic marker in OHCA patients with an initially refractory VF. Patients with intermittent ROSC after the initial VF and ongoing VF seem to be optimal candidates for an invasive approach. Asystole detection at any time during resuscitation is a strong negative prognostic marker, irrespective of the initial rhythm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006787\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006787","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:一项布拉格院外心脏骤停(OHCA)研究表明,有创方法(早期送往医院,体外心肺复苏[ECPR])是难治性OHCA的一种可行且有效的治疗策略。这项对布拉格OHCA研究的事后分析旨在根据院前和院早期心律的详细过程对患者的预后进行分层。设计、环境和患者:该分析包括随机纳入布拉格OHCA研究的所有256例患者(中位年龄58岁,17%为女性)。根据180天后的神经系统结果分析院前期间的心律顺序。主要终点是180天的脑功能1或2类生存的综合结果。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:在研究队列中,156例(61%)表现为心室颤动(VF), 45例无脉性电活动,55例为初始心律停止。达到自发循环持续恢复(ROSC)的初始VF患者达到主要结局的比例最高(32/44[73%])。在心肺复苏期间出现一次或多次心脏骤停的患者,其主要终点发生率最低(5/39[13%])。与传统方法相比,间歇性ROSC患者在采用侵入性方法(包括ECPR)治疗时,实现主要结局的成功率更高(26/34 [76%]vs. 24/50 [48%];P < 0.05)。结论:达到ROSC是OHCA患者最初难治性室性房颤的最佳预后指标。初次室性心动过速和持续性室性心动过速后出现间歇性ROSC的患者似乎是有创入路的最佳选择。在复苏过程中的任何时候检测到心脏骤停是一个强有力的阴性预后指标,与初始心律无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiac Rhythm Conversions and the Outcome in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Extracorporeal Versus Conventional Resuscitation.

Objectives: A Prague out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) study has demonstrated that an invasive approach (early transport to the hospital, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation [ECPR]) is a feasible and effective treatment strategy in refractory OHCA. This post hoc analysis of the Prague OHCA study aimed to stratify the prognosis of patients according to the detailed course of heart rhythm during prehospital and early hospital periods.

Design, setting, and patients: This analysis included all 256 patients (median age 58, 17% females) randomized to the Prague OHCA study. The sequence of heart rhythms during the prehospital period was analyzed in terms of neurologic outcomes after 180 days. The primary outcome was a composite of survival with Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at 180 days.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Within the study cohort, 156 (61%) manifested ventricular fibrillation (VF), 45 pulseless electrical activity, and 55 asystole as the initial rhythm. Patients with an initial VF who reached a sustained recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) had the highest proportion of reaching a primary outcome (32/44 [73%]). Patients who had one or more episodes of asystole during cardiopulmonary resuscitation had the lowest rate of primary endpoint (5/39 [13%]). Patients who experienced intermittent ROSC showed a higher success rate in achieving the primary outcome when treated with an invasive-based approach (including ECPR) compared with the conventional strategy (26/34 [76%] vs. 24/50 [48%]; p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Achieving ROSC is the best prognostic marker in OHCA patients with an initially refractory VF. Patients with intermittent ROSC after the initial VF and ongoing VF seem to be optimal candidates for an invasive approach. Asystole detection at any time during resuscitation is a strong negative prognostic marker, irrespective of the initial rhythm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信