Iksung Cho, Dae-Young Kim, Jinseob Kim, Ha Jeong Lim, Jiwon Seo, Kyu Kim, Seo-Yeon Gwak, Hyun-Jung Lee, Hee Jeong Lee, Kyu-Yong Ko, Chi Young Shim, Jong-Won Ha, Seonhwa Lee, In-Cheol Kim, Kang-Un Choi, Jang-Won Son, Joo Hee Park, Geu-Ru Hong, Jagat Narula
{"title":"重度二尖瓣狭窄伴低舒张压梯度的长期随访:来自MASTER Registry。","authors":"Iksung Cho, Dae-Young Kim, Jinseob Kim, Ha Jeong Lim, Jiwon Seo, Kyu Kim, Seo-Yeon Gwak, Hyun-Jung Lee, Hee Jeong Lee, Kyu-Yong Ko, Chi Young Shim, Jong-Won Ha, Seonhwa Lee, In-Cheol Kim, Kang-Un Choi, Jang-Won Son, Joo Hee Park, Geu-Ru Hong, Jagat Narula","doi":"10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term follow-up studies in severe mitral stenosis (MS) with low transmitral mean diastolic pressure gradient (MDPG) are not available. We evaluated the prognostic implications of severe MS with low MDPG in our MASTER (Multicenter Mitral Stenosis with Rheumatic Etiology) registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with severe rheumatic MS (mitral valve area ≤1.5 cm<sup>2</sup>) from the long-term MASTER registry. Patients were categorized into high (≥5 mm Hg) or low (<5 mm Hg) MDPG groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1248 patients with severe MS, 322 (25.8%) had low MDPG and 926 (74.2%) had high MDPG. Their mean age was 59±13 years, 25% were men, and 74% had atrial fibrillation. Patients with low MDPG were older and had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation. During a mean follow-up of 6.8±5.9 years, 194 (15.5%) patients experienced major adverse events. Patients who had low MDPG sustained more events than those with high MDPG (hazard ratio, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.15-2.12]; <i>P</i>=0.004), and low MDPG was independently associated with poor outcome (hazard ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.02-1.97]; <i>P</i>=0.038) in the multivariable model. In the subgroup analysis of patients with low MDPG, decreased LA reservoir strain was independently associated with poor outcome (hazard ratio, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.25-8.31]; <i>P</i>=0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Severe patients with MS and low MDPG carried a greater risk of adverse events than those with high MDPG and had less frequent and delayed mitral valve intervention. Also, it is not necessarily indicative of milder hemodynamic encumbrance. LA reservoir strain could help identify a subgroup associated with poor prognosis in patients with low MDPG.</p>","PeriodicalId":10202,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"e018124"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Follow-Up in Severe Mitral Stenosis With Low Transmitral Diastolic Pressure Gradient: From MASTER Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Iksung Cho, Dae-Young Kim, Jinseob Kim, Ha Jeong Lim, Jiwon Seo, Kyu Kim, Seo-Yeon Gwak, Hyun-Jung Lee, Hee Jeong Lee, Kyu-Yong Ko, Chi Young Shim, Jong-Won Ha, Seonhwa Lee, In-Cheol Kim, Kang-Un Choi, Jang-Won Son, Joo Hee Park, Geu-Ru Hong, Jagat Narula\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term follow-up studies in severe mitral stenosis (MS) with low transmitral mean diastolic pressure gradient (MDPG) are not available. We evaluated the prognostic implications of severe MS with low MDPG in our MASTER (Multicenter Mitral Stenosis with Rheumatic Etiology) registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with severe rheumatic MS (mitral valve area ≤1.5 cm<sup>2</sup>) from the long-term MASTER registry. Patients were categorized into high (≥5 mm Hg) or low (<5 mm Hg) MDPG groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1248 patients with severe MS, 322 (25.8%) had low MDPG and 926 (74.2%) had high MDPG. Their mean age was 59±13 years, 25% were men, and 74% had atrial fibrillation. Patients with low MDPG were older and had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation. During a mean follow-up of 6.8±5.9 years, 194 (15.5%) patients experienced major adverse events. Patients who had low MDPG sustained more events than those with high MDPG (hazard ratio, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.15-2.12]; <i>P</i>=0.004), and low MDPG was independently associated with poor outcome (hazard ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.02-1.97]; <i>P</i>=0.038) in the multivariable model. In the subgroup analysis of patients with low MDPG, decreased LA reservoir strain was independently associated with poor outcome (hazard ratio, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.25-8.31]; <i>P</i>=0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Severe patients with MS and low MDPG carried a greater risk of adverse events than those with high MDPG and had less frequent and delayed mitral valve intervention. Also, it is not necessarily indicative of milder hemodynamic encumbrance. LA reservoir strain could help identify a subgroup associated with poor prognosis in patients with low MDPG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e018124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018124\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018124","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Follow-Up in Severe Mitral Stenosis With Low Transmitral Diastolic Pressure Gradient: From MASTER Registry.
Background: Long-term follow-up studies in severe mitral stenosis (MS) with low transmitral mean diastolic pressure gradient (MDPG) are not available. We evaluated the prognostic implications of severe MS with low MDPG in our MASTER (Multicenter Mitral Stenosis with Rheumatic Etiology) registry.
Methods: We included patients with severe rheumatic MS (mitral valve area ≤1.5 cm2) from the long-term MASTER registry. Patients were categorized into high (≥5 mm Hg) or low (<5 mm Hg) MDPG groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and stroke.
Results: Among 1248 patients with severe MS, 322 (25.8%) had low MDPG and 926 (74.2%) had high MDPG. Their mean age was 59±13 years, 25% were men, and 74% had atrial fibrillation. Patients with low MDPG were older and had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation. During a mean follow-up of 6.8±5.9 years, 194 (15.5%) patients experienced major adverse events. Patients who had low MDPG sustained more events than those with high MDPG (hazard ratio, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.15-2.12]; P=0.004), and low MDPG was independently associated with poor outcome (hazard ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.02-1.97]; P=0.038) in the multivariable model. In the subgroup analysis of patients with low MDPG, decreased LA reservoir strain was independently associated with poor outcome (hazard ratio, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.25-8.31]; P=0.016).
Conclusions: Severe patients with MS and low MDPG carried a greater risk of adverse events than those with high MDPG and had less frequent and delayed mitral valve intervention. Also, it is not necessarily indicative of milder hemodynamic encumbrance. LA reservoir strain could help identify a subgroup associated with poor prognosis in patients with low MDPG.
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, an American Heart Association journal, publishes high-quality, patient-centric articles focusing on observational studies, clinical trials, and advances in applied (translational) research. The journal features innovative, multimodality approaches to the diagnosis and risk stratification of cardiovascular disease. Modalities covered include echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy, magnetic resonance angiography, cardiac positron emission tomography, noninvasive assessment of vascular and endothelial function, radionuclide imaging, molecular imaging, and others.
Article types considered by Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging include Original Research, Research Letters, Advances in Cardiovascular Imaging, Clinical Implications of Molecular Imaging Research, How to Use Imaging, Translating Novel Imaging Technologies into Clinical Applications, and Cardiovascular Images.