蒙古国牛布鲁氏菌病的定量PCR检测方法。

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Batsukh Naranchimeg, Batsaikhan Chantsal, Badrakh Sandagdorj, Tsognemekh Bolormaa, Purevdorj Ulzii-Orshikh, Adilbish Altanchimeg, Sumiya Ganzorig, Vanaabaatar Batbaatar, Motohiro Horiuchi, Purevdorj Nyam-Osor
{"title":"蒙古国牛布鲁氏菌病的定量PCR检测方法。","authors":"Batsukh Naranchimeg, Batsaikhan Chantsal, Badrakh Sandagdorj, Tsognemekh Bolormaa, Purevdorj Ulzii-Orshikh, Adilbish Altanchimeg, Sumiya Ganzorig, Vanaabaatar Batbaatar, Motohiro Horiuchi, Purevdorj Nyam-Osor","doi":"10.1186/s12917-025-04918-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brucellosis in livestock is endemic in Mongolia, and efficient monitoring is required for clarifying its prevalence. Milk can be obtained noninvasively and is useful for monitoring brucellosis in livestock. However, the usefulness of milk in monitoring brucellosis should be clarified.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Serum and milk samples were obtained from 326 cows from six farms near Ulaanbaatar City between 2020 and 2022. Serum and milk were assessed using the Rose Bengal Test (RBT) and Milk Ring Test (MRT), respectively. All milk samples were further subjected to bacterial isolation and DNA extraction. DNA samples were analyzed with quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting Brucella genus-specific IS711 insertion sequence to detect and estimate Brucella spp. levels in milk. qPCR-positive samples were further subjected to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay to discriminate B. abortus field strains from the S19 vaccine strain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 326 milk samples, 108 (33.1%) were revealed to be positive for Brucella spp. by qPCR, whereas only 5 samples (1.5%) were deemed positive via the bacterial isolation. No S19 vaccine strain was identified in the IS711 qPCR-positive milk samples by the SNP assay. Although qPCR detected Brucella spp. from milk, which was obtained from cows in three lactation stages, the detection ratio was significantly higher in the early lactation stage than in the middle lactation stage. Additionally, the five milk samples from which Brucella spp, were isolated exhibited the top 5 estimated colony forming units among the IS711 qPCR-positive samples, indicating that detection sensitivity of the IS711 qPCR is extremely higher than that of bacterial culture. There was a tendency that milk samples from RBT- and MRT-positive cows are more likely to be positive by IS711 qPCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results revealed that analysis of milk with qPCR is easy and sensitive monitoring method for detecting Brucella infection in livestock.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of Brucella spp. from milk by quantitative PCR as a monitoring method for brucellosis in cattle in Mongolia.\",\"authors\":\"Batsukh Naranchimeg, Batsaikhan Chantsal, Badrakh Sandagdorj, Tsognemekh Bolormaa, Purevdorj Ulzii-Orshikh, Adilbish Altanchimeg, Sumiya Ganzorig, Vanaabaatar Batbaatar, Motohiro Horiuchi, Purevdorj Nyam-Osor\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12917-025-04918-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brucellosis in livestock is endemic in Mongolia, and efficient monitoring is required for clarifying its prevalence. Milk can be obtained noninvasively and is useful for monitoring brucellosis in livestock. However, the usefulness of milk in monitoring brucellosis should be clarified.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Serum and milk samples were obtained from 326 cows from six farms near Ulaanbaatar City between 2020 and 2022. Serum and milk were assessed using the Rose Bengal Test (RBT) and Milk Ring Test (MRT), respectively. All milk samples were further subjected to bacterial isolation and DNA extraction. DNA samples were analyzed with quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting Brucella genus-specific IS711 insertion sequence to detect and estimate Brucella spp. levels in milk. qPCR-positive samples were further subjected to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay to discriminate B. abortus field strains from the S19 vaccine strain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 326 milk samples, 108 (33.1%) were revealed to be positive for Brucella spp. by qPCR, whereas only 5 samples (1.5%) were deemed positive via the bacterial isolation. No S19 vaccine strain was identified in the IS711 qPCR-positive milk samples by the SNP assay. Although qPCR detected Brucella spp. from milk, which was obtained from cows in three lactation stages, the detection ratio was significantly higher in the early lactation stage than in the middle lactation stage. Additionally, the five milk samples from which Brucella spp, were isolated exhibited the top 5 estimated colony forming units among the IS711 qPCR-positive samples, indicating that detection sensitivity of the IS711 qPCR is extremely higher than that of bacterial culture. There was a tendency that milk samples from RBT- and MRT-positive cows are more likely to be positive by IS711 qPCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results revealed that analysis of milk with qPCR is easy and sensitive monitoring method for detecting Brucella infection in livestock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Veterinary Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261702/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Veterinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04918-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04918-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牲畜布鲁氏菌病是蒙古的地方性疾病,需要进行有效的监测以明确其流行情况。牛奶可以无创获取,对监测牲畜中的布鲁氏菌病很有用。然而,应澄清牛奶在监测布鲁氏菌病中的作用。材料和方法:从2020年至2022年乌兰巴托市附近6个农场的326头奶牛中采集血清和牛奶样本。血清和乳汁分别采用玫瑰孟加拉试验(RBT)和乳环试验(MRT)进行评估。所有牛奶样品进一步进行细菌分离和DNA提取。采用针对布鲁氏菌属特异性IS711插入序列的定量PCR (qPCR)方法检测和估计牛奶中布鲁氏菌的含量。qpcr阳性样品进一步进行单核苷酸多态性(SNP)测定,以区分野株与S19疫苗株。结果:326份牛奶样品中,108份(33.1%)经qPCR检测为布鲁氏菌阳性,而5份(1.5%)经细菌分离检测为阳性。IS711 qpcr阳性牛奶样品中未发现S19疫苗株。虽然qPCR检测出了3个泌乳期奶牛的牛奶中的布鲁氏菌,但泌乳早期的检出率显著高于泌乳中期。另外,5份分离布鲁氏菌的牛奶样品在IS711 qPCR阳性样品中显示出前5位的集落形成单位,表明IS711 qPCR的检测灵敏度远远高于细菌培养。有一种趋势,来自RBT和mrt阳性奶牛的牛奶样本更有可能被IS711 qPCR阳性。结论:qPCR检测畜禽布鲁氏菌感染是一种简便、灵敏的监测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of Brucella spp. from milk by quantitative PCR as a monitoring method for brucellosis in cattle in Mongolia.

Background: Brucellosis in livestock is endemic in Mongolia, and efficient monitoring is required for clarifying its prevalence. Milk can be obtained noninvasively and is useful for monitoring brucellosis in livestock. However, the usefulness of milk in monitoring brucellosis should be clarified.

Materials and methods: Serum and milk samples were obtained from 326 cows from six farms near Ulaanbaatar City between 2020 and 2022. Serum and milk were assessed using the Rose Bengal Test (RBT) and Milk Ring Test (MRT), respectively. All milk samples were further subjected to bacterial isolation and DNA extraction. DNA samples were analyzed with quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting Brucella genus-specific IS711 insertion sequence to detect and estimate Brucella spp. levels in milk. qPCR-positive samples were further subjected to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay to discriminate B. abortus field strains from the S19 vaccine strain.

Results: Of the 326 milk samples, 108 (33.1%) were revealed to be positive for Brucella spp. by qPCR, whereas only 5 samples (1.5%) were deemed positive via the bacterial isolation. No S19 vaccine strain was identified in the IS711 qPCR-positive milk samples by the SNP assay. Although qPCR detected Brucella spp. from milk, which was obtained from cows in three lactation stages, the detection ratio was significantly higher in the early lactation stage than in the middle lactation stage. Additionally, the five milk samples from which Brucella spp, were isolated exhibited the top 5 estimated colony forming units among the IS711 qPCR-positive samples, indicating that detection sensitivity of the IS711 qPCR is extremely higher than that of bacterial culture. There was a tendency that milk samples from RBT- and MRT-positive cows are more likely to be positive by IS711 qPCR.

Conclusion: The results revealed that analysis of milk with qPCR is easy and sensitive monitoring method for detecting Brucella infection in livestock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信