获取数字卫生技术:个性化框架和全球视角

IF 41.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sanjiv M. Narayan, Mina K. Chung, Demilade Adedinsewo, Luisa C. C. Brant, Leslie L. Davis, David Duncker, Jennifer L. Hall, Janet K. Han, Carolyn S. P. Lam, Eldrin Lewis, Joseph Loscalzo, Manlio F. Márquez, Vasiliki Rahimzadeh, Fatima Rodriguez, Prashanthan Sanders, Emma Svennberg, Kenneth Stein, Mintu Turakhia, Clyde Yancy, Antonis A. Armoundas
{"title":"获取数字卫生技术:个性化框架和全球视角","authors":"Sanjiv M. Narayan, Mina K. Chung, Demilade Adedinsewo, Luisa C. C. Brant, Leslie L. Davis, David Duncker, Jennifer L. Hall, Janet K. Han, Carolyn S. P. Lam, Eldrin Lewis, Joseph Loscalzo, Manlio F. Márquez, Vasiliki Rahimzadeh, Fatima Rodriguez, Prashanthan Sanders, Emma Svennberg, Kenneth Stein, Mintu Turakhia, Clyde Yancy, Antonis A. Armoundas","doi":"10.1038/s41569-025-01184-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The emergence and rapid adoption of digital health technologies (DHT) present unprecedented opportunities to democratize and reduce disparities in health care by monitoring health and disease at the point of care in all patients. However, limited access to DHT is becoming a major obstacle to realizing these goals. Access to DHT is influenced not only by well-recognized social determinants of health, but also by digital determinants of health, such as digital literacy and the need for broad access to digital infrastructure, as well as commercial and economic factors. Addressing these challenges and designing unbiased systems of care are essential to enable broad access to DHT and to benefit diverse and under-represented communities. Doing so will fill gaps in the clinical evidence base and avoid perpetuating historical biases. In this Review, we propose a personalized framework to improve access to DHT, addressing determinants of access at the individual, interpersonal, community, society, government and industry levels. We frame these issues globally, highlighting how the challenges to DHT access and potential solutions might differ between continents while also emphasizing common themes. We provide perspectives from partners across the spectrum of health care, including clinicians, clinical trialists, and experts from digital health and industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":18976,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":41.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to digital health technologies: personalized framework and global perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Sanjiv M. Narayan, Mina K. Chung, Demilade Adedinsewo, Luisa C. C. Brant, Leslie L. Davis, David Duncker, Jennifer L. Hall, Janet K. Han, Carolyn S. P. Lam, Eldrin Lewis, Joseph Loscalzo, Manlio F. Márquez, Vasiliki Rahimzadeh, Fatima Rodriguez, Prashanthan Sanders, Emma Svennberg, Kenneth Stein, Mintu Turakhia, Clyde Yancy, Antonis A. Armoundas\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41569-025-01184-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The emergence and rapid adoption of digital health technologies (DHT) present unprecedented opportunities to democratize and reduce disparities in health care by monitoring health and disease at the point of care in all patients. However, limited access to DHT is becoming a major obstacle to realizing these goals. Access to DHT is influenced not only by well-recognized social determinants of health, but also by digital determinants of health, such as digital literacy and the need for broad access to digital infrastructure, as well as commercial and economic factors. Addressing these challenges and designing unbiased systems of care are essential to enable broad access to DHT and to benefit diverse and under-represented communities. Doing so will fill gaps in the clinical evidence base and avoid perpetuating historical biases. In this Review, we propose a personalized framework to improve access to DHT, addressing determinants of access at the individual, interpersonal, community, society, government and industry levels. We frame these issues globally, highlighting how the challenges to DHT access and potential solutions might differ between continents while also emphasizing common themes. We provide perspectives from partners across the spectrum of health care, including clinicians, clinical trialists, and experts from digital health and industry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":41.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-025-01184-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-025-01184-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字卫生技术的出现和迅速采用为通过在所有患者的护理点监测健康和疾病,实现卫生保健民主化和缩小差距提供了前所未有的机会。然而,获得DHT的机会有限正在成为实现这些目标的主要障碍。获得DHT不仅受到公认的健康社会决定因素的影响,而且还受到健康的数字决定因素的影响,例如数字扫盲和广泛使用数字基础设施的需要,以及商业和经济因素。应对这些挑战和设计公正的保健系统对于广泛获得DHT并使多样化和代表性不足的社区受益至关重要。这样做将填补临床证据基础的空白,避免历史偏见的延续。在这篇综述中,我们提出了一个个性化的框架来改善DHT的可及性,从个人、人际、社区、社会、政府和行业层面解决可及性的决定因素。我们在全球范围内提出这些问题,强调各大洲在强调共同主题的同时,DHT获取面临的挑战和潜在解决方案可能会有所不同。我们提供来自医疗保健各个领域的合作伙伴的观点,包括临床医生、临床试验人员以及来自数字健康和行业的专家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Access to digital health technologies: personalized framework and global perspectives

Access to digital health technologies: personalized framework and global perspectives

The emergence and rapid adoption of digital health technologies (DHT) present unprecedented opportunities to democratize and reduce disparities in health care by monitoring health and disease at the point of care in all patients. However, limited access to DHT is becoming a major obstacle to realizing these goals. Access to DHT is influenced not only by well-recognized social determinants of health, but also by digital determinants of health, such as digital literacy and the need for broad access to digital infrastructure, as well as commercial and economic factors. Addressing these challenges and designing unbiased systems of care are essential to enable broad access to DHT and to benefit diverse and under-represented communities. Doing so will fill gaps in the clinical evidence base and avoid perpetuating historical biases. In this Review, we propose a personalized framework to improve access to DHT, addressing determinants of access at the individual, interpersonal, community, society, government and industry levels. We frame these issues globally, highlighting how the challenges to DHT access and potential solutions might differ between continents while also emphasizing common themes. We provide perspectives from partners across the spectrum of health care, including clinicians, clinical trialists, and experts from digital health and industry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Cardiology
Nature Reviews Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
0.60%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Cardiology aims to be the go-to source for reviews and commentaries in the scientific and clinical communities it serves. Focused on providing authoritative and accessible articles enriched with clear figures and tables, the journal strives to offer unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, maximizing the usefulness and impact of each publication. It covers a broad range of content types, including Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives, catering to practising cardiologists and cardiovascular research scientists. Authored by renowned clinicians, academics, and researchers, the content targets readers in the biological and medical sciences, ensuring accessibility across various disciplines. In-depth Reviews offer up-to-date information, while Consensus Statements provide evidence-based recommendations. Perspectives and News & Views present topical discussions and opinions, and the Research Highlights section filters primary research from cardiovascular and general medical journals. As part of the Nature Reviews portfolio, Nature Reviews Cardiology maintains high standards and a wide reach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信