{"title":"基于无代码平台的多病眼底图像生成","authors":"Huiyu Liang, Qi Zhang, Tian Lin, Chenli Hu, Chaoxin Zheng, Xue Yao, Man Chen, Yifan Chen, Yih Chung Tham, Haoyu Chen","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-326741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To generate fundus photographs of multiple kinds of retinal disease, bypassing the requirement of coding technique. Methods The dataset contained fundus photographs of 10 categories of retinal conditions, with 500 fundus photographs in each category. We randomly divided the collected data into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%). Google Colaboratory was used to implement Pix2Pix to generate fundus photographs for each category. We compared the diagnostic abilities of ophthalmologists on both real and synthetic images. The diagnostic performance of the classification models trained on real, synthetic and combined data sets was also compared. Furthermore, the real and synthesised images were distinguished by ophthalmologists and artificial intelligence (AI) image detection websites. Results Fundus photographs of 10 categories were successfully synthesised using our method. The synthetic images showed slightly higher diagnostic accuracy by the three ophthalmologists than the real images (99.7% vs 98.7%, 98.0% vs 96.0% and 99.7% vs 94.3%; p=0.109). Training ResNet-50 and VGG-19 models with a combination of real and synthetic images resulted in significant improvements in accuracy, achieving 93.7% and 89.3%, respectively. Five residents achieved at least 92.5% accuracy in discriminating between real and synthetic images. In contrast, three AI image detection websites showed limited capability in this task, with a maximum accuracy of 51.2%. Conclusion Pix2Pix on Google Colaboratory can efficiently produce a diverse range of fundus images with typical characters. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. The fundus photographs generated in this study have been uploaded to the website (<https://generated-fundus-images.github.io/x/>) for sharing and can be accessed by anyone. The website address is shown in the text.","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generation of multidisease fundus photographs with code-free platform\",\"authors\":\"Huiyu Liang, Qi Zhang, Tian Lin, Chenli Hu, Chaoxin Zheng, Xue Yao, Man Chen, Yifan Chen, Yih Chung Tham, Haoyu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bjo-2024-326741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose To generate fundus photographs of multiple kinds of retinal disease, bypassing the requirement of coding technique. Methods The dataset contained fundus photographs of 10 categories of retinal conditions, with 500 fundus photographs in each category. We randomly divided the collected data into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%). Google Colaboratory was used to implement Pix2Pix to generate fundus photographs for each category. We compared the diagnostic abilities of ophthalmologists on both real and synthetic images. The diagnostic performance of the classification models trained on real, synthetic and combined data sets was also compared. Furthermore, the real and synthesised images were distinguished by ophthalmologists and artificial intelligence (AI) image detection websites. Results Fundus photographs of 10 categories were successfully synthesised using our method. The synthetic images showed slightly higher diagnostic accuracy by the three ophthalmologists than the real images (99.7% vs 98.7%, 98.0% vs 96.0% and 99.7% vs 94.3%; p=0.109). Training ResNet-50 and VGG-19 models with a combination of real and synthetic images resulted in significant improvements in accuracy, achieving 93.7% and 89.3%, respectively. Five residents achieved at least 92.5% accuracy in discriminating between real and synthetic images. In contrast, three AI image detection websites showed limited capability in this task, with a maximum accuracy of 51.2%. Conclusion Pix2Pix on Google Colaboratory can efficiently produce a diverse range of fundus images with typical characters. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. The fundus photographs generated in this study have been uploaded to the website (<https://generated-fundus-images.github.io/x/>) for sharing and can be accessed by anyone. The website address is shown in the text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-326741\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-326741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Generation of multidisease fundus photographs with code-free platform
Purpose To generate fundus photographs of multiple kinds of retinal disease, bypassing the requirement of coding technique. Methods The dataset contained fundus photographs of 10 categories of retinal conditions, with 500 fundus photographs in each category. We randomly divided the collected data into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%). Google Colaboratory was used to implement Pix2Pix to generate fundus photographs for each category. We compared the diagnostic abilities of ophthalmologists on both real and synthetic images. The diagnostic performance of the classification models trained on real, synthetic and combined data sets was also compared. Furthermore, the real and synthesised images were distinguished by ophthalmologists and artificial intelligence (AI) image detection websites. Results Fundus photographs of 10 categories were successfully synthesised using our method. The synthetic images showed slightly higher diagnostic accuracy by the three ophthalmologists than the real images (99.7% vs 98.7%, 98.0% vs 96.0% and 99.7% vs 94.3%; p=0.109). Training ResNet-50 and VGG-19 models with a combination of real and synthetic images resulted in significant improvements in accuracy, achieving 93.7% and 89.3%, respectively. Five residents achieved at least 92.5% accuracy in discriminating between real and synthetic images. In contrast, three AI image detection websites showed limited capability in this task, with a maximum accuracy of 51.2%. Conclusion Pix2Pix on Google Colaboratory can efficiently produce a diverse range of fundus images with typical characters. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. The fundus photographs generated in this study have been uploaded to the website () for sharing and can be accessed by anyone. The website address is shown in the text.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.