用于超声引导手术的自制低成本超声幻影:基于调查的比较分析。

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hassan Magdy Abd Elrazek, Mohamed Sherif Ali Ahmed, Dalia Fahmy, Reem Khaled
{"title":"用于超声引导手术的自制低成本超声幻影:基于调查的比较分析。","authors":"Hassan Magdy Abd Elrazek, Mohamed Sherif Ali Ahmed, Dalia Fahmy, Reem Khaled","doi":"10.1007/s40477-025-01052-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is growing demand for ultrasound-based minimally invasive procedures, such as biopsy, aspiration, and tube drain. Homemade ultrasound (US) phantoms provide a simple, low-cost method for training young radiology residents. We aimed to compare and finally prescribe low-cost recipes of a US phantom model utilizing available ingredients, providing homogenous images and is stable in our hot, humid weather.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five recipes with different ingredients and concentrations were used during five workshops. All participants were asked to fill out a survey assessing the stability, visibility of targets, homogeneity, and persistence of air-filled tracks. Solid and cyst-like targets were used for training and were included in the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that model 3 (1 cup of gelatin powder per 2 cups of cornflower) and model 5 (7 tablespoons of gelatin powder per 4 tablespoons of mucil) yielded the best phantoms in terms of stability and visibility of targets. Model 5 provided the best homogeneity (no layering), but it was the most expensive. Animal tissue within US phantoms was not suitable for recurrent use after 24 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gelatin-based homemade US phantom models were useful in training young radiologists. The best mixture was gelatin and mucil (in a 7:4 ratio), followed by gelatin and cornflower (in a 1:2 ratio).</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homemade, low-cost ultrasound phantoms for ultrasound-guided procedures: a survey-based comparative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Magdy Abd Elrazek, Mohamed Sherif Ali Ahmed, Dalia Fahmy, Reem Khaled\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40477-025-01052-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is growing demand for ultrasound-based minimally invasive procedures, such as biopsy, aspiration, and tube drain. Homemade ultrasound (US) phantoms provide a simple, low-cost method for training young radiology residents. We aimed to compare and finally prescribe low-cost recipes of a US phantom model utilizing available ingredients, providing homogenous images and is stable in our hot, humid weather.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five recipes with different ingredients and concentrations were used during five workshops. All participants were asked to fill out a survey assessing the stability, visibility of targets, homogeneity, and persistence of air-filled tracks. Solid and cyst-like targets were used for training and were included in the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that model 3 (1 cup of gelatin powder per 2 cups of cornflower) and model 5 (7 tablespoons of gelatin powder per 4 tablespoons of mucil) yielded the best phantoms in terms of stability and visibility of targets. Model 5 provided the best homogeneity (no layering), but it was the most expensive. Animal tissue within US phantoms was not suitable for recurrent use after 24 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gelatin-based homemade US phantom models were useful in training young radiologists. The best mixture was gelatin and mucil (in a 7:4 ratio), followed by gelatin and cornflower (in a 1:2 ratio).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01052-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01052-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对超声微创手术的需求越来越大,如活检、穿刺和管引流。自制超声(美国)模型为培训年轻的放射科住院医师提供了一种简单、低成本的方法。我们的目标是比较并最终开出美国幻影模型的低成本食谱,利用现有的成分,提供均匀的图像,并在我们炎热潮湿的天气下保持稳定。方法:在5个车间采用5种不同成分和浓度的配方。所有参与者都被要求填写一份调查,评估目标的稳定性、可见性、均匀性和充满空气的轨道的持久性。实心靶和囊状靶用于训练,并纳入调查。结果:我们的研究结果表明,模型3(每2杯矢车菊1杯明胶粉)和模型5(每4汤匙粘液7汤匙明胶粉)在稳定性和目标可见性方面产生了最好的幻影。模型5提供了最好的均匀性(没有分层),但它是最昂贵的。结论:基于明胶的自制US假体模型在培训年轻放射科医师时是有用的。最佳配比为明胶与黏液(7:4),其次为明胶与矢车菊(1:2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Homemade, low-cost ultrasound phantoms for ultrasound-guided procedures: a survey-based comparative analysis.

Purpose: There is growing demand for ultrasound-based minimally invasive procedures, such as biopsy, aspiration, and tube drain. Homemade ultrasound (US) phantoms provide a simple, low-cost method for training young radiology residents. We aimed to compare and finally prescribe low-cost recipes of a US phantom model utilizing available ingredients, providing homogenous images and is stable in our hot, humid weather.

Methods: Five recipes with different ingredients and concentrations were used during five workshops. All participants were asked to fill out a survey assessing the stability, visibility of targets, homogeneity, and persistence of air-filled tracks. Solid and cyst-like targets were used for training and were included in the survey.

Results: Our findings demonstrate that model 3 (1 cup of gelatin powder per 2 cups of cornflower) and model 5 (7 tablespoons of gelatin powder per 4 tablespoons of mucil) yielded the best phantoms in terms of stability and visibility of targets. Model 5 provided the best homogeneity (no layering), but it was the most expensive. Animal tissue within US phantoms was not suitable for recurrent use after 24 h.

Conclusions: Gelatin-based homemade US phantom models were useful in training young radiologists. The best mixture was gelatin and mucil (in a 7:4 ratio), followed by gelatin and cornflower (in a 1:2 ratio).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信